Please excuse my ignorance here, probably due to the way I was raised, but I am surprised that this expression seems so serious to those who posted here. I was always of the impression that taking the Lord’s name in vain meant using it anger or frustration. Since the expression OMG is normally used as an expression of surprise, shock, or amazement please educate me on why this expression is considered to be used “in vain”. I realize that the expression is not one of respect and is best to be avoided, but at the same time it does not seem as offensive as indicated in this thread.
Webster Dictionary defines-
Vain: 1. empty, of no real value, idle, worthless.
I’ll try to explain:
Santus! Santus! Santus! :bowdown: Holy,Holy,Holy is God. When we start using the Lord’s holy name without due respect, it can lead us to habit, which can lead us to mortal sin. How? Well, by allowing ourselves to use the Lord’s name repeatedly without thinking of God is not respecting God but rather disrespecting Him. At the name of Jesus, all knees shall bend :bowdown: in Heaven, on the earth and under the earth. That’s why we bow our heads during the Mass at Jesus’ name or even in conversions anywhere else…or at least we’re supposed to.
The expression OMG is **normally used **as an expression of surprise, shock, or amazement…
Exactly. We have normalized the saying of God’s name, reducing His value in our lives and thus in our society. However, when we look at the Old Testament we see reverence and fear of the Lord at His Holy name punishable by death. The early Christians and Saints also held the name of Jesus in high regard and reverence, though not in fear of Mosaic judgement, but out of true love for our Savior

. In our society today we no longer think of God when we say God. Now who do think enjoys that irony. Ahh, could it be…Satan?

Ol’Nick loves it when we do this.
Think of it this way. We show respect to our priest by calling him, “Father”, for he is a spiritual father to us. The Lord is an infinitely greater Father to us with infinitely greater love for us. Yet we show less respect for His name and more respect to a priest by addressing him by the proper title and we teach our kids like-wise? As a parent my children call me father or dad and I must remind myself of what that means. In our domestic church I am their spiritual “father”. If they were to call me Scott, I would be offended and feel the need to correct them immediately. Shouldn’t we do the same at the utterance of God’s Holy name in vain?
God is in no way,1. empty, of no real value, idle, worthless. I hope this helps.
Pax Christi
Scott