Tijerus - Totally! And it makes a lot of sense: as a married person, I can assure you that there are ways to serve God that married people simply can’t do, and likewise, people in religious life can’t do (or at least, not as freely).
I know a woman who rents rooms in her house out to young women, especially single moms, and has created a whole family feeling community in her home. She is single and owns her own house. She doesn’t need the space for her own family since she’s single. She doesn’t have to live in a religious community, or answer to a religious community for living arrangements, or whatever. She knows she has a vocation to the single life and is perfectly satisfied with it now.
Thank you very much for a great post. The vocation to lay celibacy seems (from Catholic Discussion Sites) to be far more accepted and recognized than ever before. You are very right generally speaking that those living in lay celibacy have sometimes that complete freedom to move wherever The Lord indicates. At one time (I live alone) and living in a very poor suburb, I was taking in homeless teenagers for a bed and a meal. Our parish priest said to me “I wish I could do something like that” When I asked why he could not, he replied that the Bishop would never allow it.
When I first thought about the life, I was very hesitant about it having been raised and then living in a Catholic culture that never ever mentioned such a vocation. I sought advice from a Jesuit theologian to ensure that The Lord would grant me all the necessary Graces to live such a life and at the time it seemed to me that I would need heaps and heaps of Grace, which I did!
Father K (Jesuit Theologian) confirmed that indeed there was such a vocation under private vows as did my then priest theologian director and confessor. However, it was unheard of in Catholic culture back then to my knowledge anyway. I was truly hesitant about raising the subject with either, fearing I might be heretical. Back then only priesthood and religious life were known as vocations per se. Marriage has been a late arrival and lay celibacy still struggling somewhat for general acceptance into Catholic Culture. A Carmelite Prioress has been a close pal for my entire journey in this vocation and she too encouraged me and when I dragged my feet in near defeat and discouragement, she kept me going!
Single people are like free agents in the world, totally free to do good as the opportunities arise.
Well said in most instances. The lay celibate vocation can be a powerful witness to a complete commitment to The Gospel and Jesus, free to move wherever and whenever. *I recall many years ago wanting to get into a disco place in the city as I had heard many bad reports about it. I was refused entry because of the way I was dressed (dowdy and simple I guess). I waited a few months and then went back dressed to the nines as it were, plastered in makeup and was admitted. And found out all I wanted to know and more than I ever thought I would even in wild imagination.
I too think it needs more attention than just a “left-over” vocation. It’s a very useful way to live “celibacy for the kingdom of God”. Just because one isn’t called to marriage or religious life doesn’t mean someone isn’t called to live for God. Vocation comes from “vocare”, Latin for “to call”. Some, I truly believe, are called to live the single life for God.
I agree. ‘Leftover vocation’ and ‘no vocation’ are only states of minds, not theological realities. The moment we are baptised, we have a vocation to The Gospel and faithful commitment to Jesus.
All of us are called to at least a temporary vocation of the lay single life, that is, none of us are born married or having already taken religious vows. It’s a day by day trust walk with God, taking the opportunities to do good as they come. For some of us, it’s a permanent calling to that intimate, personal relationship with God as the major companion of one’s life.
Well said.
There are saints and blesseds from the single vocation as well: I think Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati is the most popular right now. Granted, he was quite young when he died, but from what I’ve read, he may have had too wild and active a personality to be suited for the responsibilities of marriage or the obedience of religious life.
Yes, we have a few saints who were lay celibates. I smiled at the “wild and active” I think I might have recognized something of myself!!!

When I was in monastic life, my sisters struck me as so holy … and I felt so unholy

)
Anyway, blessings to you. Us marrieds find ourselves bound to our families (I’m not complaining, but that’s a reality) and unable to do all the good we might want to. We certainly need free single people to help carry the burdens of bringing the kingdom of God into the secular world
Thank you for your blessing! Ahhh without our married vocations, there would be no Church, no mankind - and certainly no popes, heirarchy, priests and religious. Nothing.
Joseph and Mary were married and called to this life in the lay secular state as we now call it - and Jesus, Son of God, was born of the Holy Spirit out of their marriage, while Mary remained virgin and sinless and St Joseph celibate. What an outstanding ‘statement’ by God about the married vocation in life!!! What outstanding parents they must have been to have raised such a Son and chosen by God to instruct, form and raise His Only Son.
Every single one of us - our popes, heirarchy, priests and religious including our entire saint’s calendar had a mother and father.
Thank you very much again for a great post from a married person into a thread about the single lay celibate vocation. And many blessings to you and yours and on your marriage.
Tigger