The harm that smoking does is minor in comparison with the harm that other activities cause. And the effect is so slow in taking effect as to be negligible. It also used to be that folks died of something else long before they ever got to the age when lung cancer or emphysema kicked in.
For that reason, even though folks have been smoking for 500 years or so, the Church never condemned it.
If you get a list or guide for the examination of conscience for preparation before the Sacrament of Confession, there are a lot of moral-warping activities on there. And they are all worse than smoking.
In my opinion, what we are doing is deliberately deluding ourselves … by saying that something is so horrible that we need to debate it …
… meanwhile overlooking allllllll those other things that the Catholic Church long ago identified as definite and QUICK soul-killers.
We seem to focus on secular “sins” … although you can get absolution by sending a certain non-presidential politician some money so he can plant trees. And he’ll send you a certificate of absolution/ carbon credits.
We need to get back to the list of sins that the Catholic Church published that we humans are still prone to … and as one confessor said to me … “quit making up sins”.
But … nonetheless … sin does exist. Many of them are biggies. We do commit them and we need to focus back on them instead of exaggerating about how smoking is a killer.
And we do exaggerate.
How do we exaggerate?
By morfing words. * We spin things.
We start by disusing the word “mortal sin”. And instead gravitate the word to “serious sin”. Mortal sin is pretty crystal clear, more or less. Serious sin … not so crystal clear.
So, we “morf” from smoking is a killer to smoking is harmful.
And anything that is harmful is a killer.
But that’s not right.
Father Benedict stepped off a curb without looking both ways. That was harmful. He was essentially killed … they pronounced him dead … but he came back after 20+ minutes. And etc. But did he commit a sin?
Is smoking any more of a sin than not looking both ways.
Is one deliberate and the other careless?
Is carelessness a sin? Yeah, well, he was tired and hadn’t eaten all day because he was busy. Yeah, well, is it ok to drive oneself to the point of exhaustion?
We are capable of driving ourselves around in circles. What’s next after smoking? In NYC, the next secular sin is “transfats”. No joke. They are already outlawed.
It seems like the secular church is unable to stop real crimes and real sin so they invent new ones that they can catch and punish people for.
And that’s where we are going.
We are inventing new sins that are easy to spot (cellulite; not recycling that soda can) so we can avoid looking in the mirror at ourselves and seeing our real sins.
Pick up one of those examination of conscience guidelines. It can be pretty illuminating.*
My dad died at age 54, he was diagnosed at 52. I grew up without him, for the most part. I’m not exaggerating. Please do not mitigate the dangerous effects of smoking. Don’t liken it to things that really have no comparison, like jay walking, or stepping off of a curb too soon into traffic. You might not have known someone who was addicted, but I have known quite a few, and it’s not an exaggeration. The Church does not condone addictive behavior either…it just doesn’t carve out a separate space for smoking. Smoking just doesn’t cause cancer…it can cause a plethera of other problems…throat problems, pneumonia, glaucoma, skin cancer, premature aging, stroke, heart disease, and of course lung cancer and many others.
It is not a slow death…some people die sooner than others.