Is 'specific Christian Church selection' a requirement for 'salvation'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorwald
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you know the story of the fishermen who got lost in the storm. His boat became broken and he is left with a few logs used to keep himself afloat. Thus he prayed and prayed for God’s hand in getting him to shore. During this time, boat after boat after boat come by and could not get his attention. He is only waiting for God. After a few days, he dies and after proper cleansing, he goes to heaven. He ask God personally there, “why didn’t you save me?” God tells him that he is foolish. God sent him three boats in response to his prayers but he just ignored them.

Does that sound like how we can ignore the saints who would pray for us and want to help us along to God? Mary is not divine. But Catholics understand that she is in Heaven right now (many mainline protestants would agree) and so she can be our helping hand. She can give us that extra prayer to get us connected to God. In Heaven saints can pray ceaselessly (remember revelations?) and obviously most if not all of us fail to pray at every moment of our existence. So it would only be smart to ask Mary to pray for us “now and at the hour of our death”. This now extends through time, not the now we know of as simple humans.

Yes, only God can judge us and we know that. We do not pray to anyone else to get their vote or anything sort of thing. We pray to the saints so that they can pray to God to give us graces to live our lives better and become saints ourselves if it is possible.

I hope you read what I wrote before about the term “father” and the Scriptures versus the text of the bible. I talked about understanding the meaning (the spirit) behind the words.

Saul, like many of the Israel, do not truly understand, so he and they only see and hear Samuel instead of seeing and hearing God. They know that it is from God that Samuel gets his words and revelations, but they are still caught up in the human priest standing before them. Of course then God would get mad at Saul, or anyone, for diminishing God’s presence by being focused on the man in front of him. And the same would apply to focusing on the particular text in the word while losing the meaning behind it. The text is important only so as to keep true to the meaning of the words in the text. (Which is hard to do in translations).

Notice in 1 Samuel 14: 10-11 " [Saul] had just finished this offering when Samuel arrived. Saul went out to greet him, and Samuel asked him, ’ What have you done?..’ ". Here Saul offered up the holocaust himself and was denounced by Samuel. “You have been foolish! Had you kept the command the Lord your God gave you, the Lord would now establish your kingship in Israel as lasting” (1 Samuel 14:13). See how you claim that Saul got in trouble for not talking to God directly earlier and now is in trouble for doing the offerings to God directly now? The reason is found in the context. Saul sought out Samuel, the human, not Samuel the prophet of God can bring Saul to God’s command. That is where Saul erred. And here, he tries to do something he has no right to, change God’s instructions and offered the holocaust himself.

As for Mary being our Mother. Remember when Christ was on the cross and "Then he said to the disciple,‘Behold, your mother.’ " (John 19: 27) This is in John’s Gospel, so he obviously know who that disciple is (it’s him 🙂 ) but he does not write his own name. He writes disciple. Are you a disciple of Christ? What is Christ telling you to do?

Lastly, please use references. It really slows down my responses to have to go look up what phrase you are referring to in your own casual words. Be serious. Christ did not tell us to be lazy. Instead he rebukes the lazy such as in the Parable of the Rich Fool (Luke 12: 16-21) for the man thought he had enough and took to living the good life. He did not seek further and learn more, he was content with his own works and own fruits. Think of yourself in relation to this man as we all are called to do. You have heard, read, and/or learn some of what the Bible says, well keep learning. If you are asking these questions, you are reading words out of historical and literary context. The term of “father” for example shows up in the same Matthew chapter that says “call no one on earth your father”. Christ also says “and of your fathers”. These two passages contradict each other if you take them by themselves. Just as the two passages on Saul’s interaction, with and without Samuel, towards God contradicts each other if you take them by themselves.
There is too much ‘junk’ above to respond to. In reference to Saul & Samuel, try reading the Chronicles. This is the scripture that I previously referenced, not Samuel. 🙂
 
OK. Fair enough. Thanks for trying.

A distinction of titles, and perhaps of roles to play. BUT there is no distinction of Person. Jesus is the Second Person of the Trinity and nothing less than the Second Person of the Trinity. That makes Jesus God - fully and completely God. And Mary is his mother. By saying Mary is the Mother of God, Catholics are confirming the complete divinity of Jesus Christ - He was and is nothing less than God in the Second Person of the Trinity. To say that Mary is not the Son of God is to suggest that Jesus Christ was something less than complete Divinity as a result of the Incarnation. However, christian theology has always been completely clear that Jesus was, both before and after the Incarnation, the fullness of Divinity. Your argument below seems to imply that Jesus was something less, therefore it would be wrong to call Mary the Mother of God. I respectfully disagree, as does the Catholic Church.

It does not appear that Jesus was anything less than fully God. If so, then you begin to call into question the nature of the atonement and the sacrifice offered. The Second Person of the Trinity took on a human nature in addition to His eternal Divine nature. As such, The Second Person of the Trinity set aside nothing, but rather put on the mantle of humanity to show us how to live.

No. It does not make sense. You are speaking of Jesus as if He were two separate persons, the “pre/post Incarnation Jesus” (Lord of Hosts) and the “intra-Incarnation Jesus” (Son of Man). That’s incorrect. The Second Person of the Trinity was all of these things and never anything less than all of these things, because he was never anything less than the Person who he always was.

Think of it this way - a human analogy. A person can be a husband, and a father, and a lawyer and a son. When that person is away from work, he is still a lawyer even if he is exercising the duties of husband, father, and/or son. Similarly, when that person is at work at his law firm, he does not cease to be a husband, father, and son. The same is true for the Person of Jesus. When He took on his human nature, He did not put aside His Divine nature, because it was/is part of who Jesus is as a Person.

Similarly, Jesus’ titles: Son of Man, and Son of God were not referencing different personae. They were titles used to reference Christ’s roles. Son of man is a term used in Ezekiel to foreshadow the Messiah, whereas the term Son of God is a NT reference to the Trinitarian nature of Jesus Christ.
WOOPYDOO! I am so glad that you have ‘enlightened’ me. 🙂
 
Hi again, just wanted to go back to your OP.

You say a ‘Christian’ is a follower of Christ’s teachings. Do you believe that the Eucharist is the true body and blood of Christ? Because that is what He said in John 6. Which Christian Church still teaches and practices this?

The Eucharist is carried out in most Christian churches, that I have attended. It is symbolic of ‘The Last Supper’ and what Christ said during this meeting. What are you trying to tell me?

I too think it is a danger to add, delete, twist, ignore, stretch and reduce the Word of God, but many Christian Churches do this - so it DOES matter which Christian Church you belong you - everyone should want to belong to the Church that teaches the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Truth is something you cannot change, it is what it is. WE are the ones who must change.

I belong to no physical ‘church’/group. I am a Christian, simply following God’s Word.

No one has the ability to judge like God does - but we do have a responsibility to adhere to the teachings of Christ and His Church - he didn’t come here to set up a book, he came to build a Church, the Church was around before the book was. And Christ says when a man sins, we have the responsibility to point that sin out to him, and if doesn’t listen take a few witnesses, if he still doesn’t listen - Christ says: Take it to the Church - not the book, the Church; and not ‘a’ Church, but ‘the’ Church.

I have attended many ‘Christian’ churches (including the Catholic Church), and have found deviations from the Word of God in every one of them. They are ALL in trouble. This is why the scripture tells us, that we will return to the days of Noah. God doesn’t lie. This is currently happening, and will continue to happen.

I hope that helps.
I hope that my responses (above) helps. 🙂
 
The Eucharist is carried out in most Christian churches, that I have attended. It is symbolic of ‘The Last Supper’ and what Christ said during this meeting. What are you trying to tell me?
It is NOT symbolic in the Catholic Church - that is what I am trying to tell you. Other Christian churches have communion but they only think of it as symbolic - they don’t believe they are eating the flesh of Christ and drinking his blood, which is what he instructed us to do in John 6 and told us at the Last Supper (this is my body, take it and eat) - Catholics believe the substance of the bread and wine is changed into the substance, the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ himself.
I belong to no physical ‘church’/group. I am a Christian, simply following God’s Word.
So do you go to many different churches to worship? I’ve started another thread on this as I get really confused why people go to different churches that teach different things.
 
I know what you believe (proof above), but the Catholic Church has added all kinds of ‘things’ to God’s Word, that were not witnessed by Christ or The Holy Ghost. Since Jesus Christ is ‘The Word in The Flesh’, I think I will follow His teachings, rather than ‘The Catholic Church’s’. I am commanded by scripture, to use the scripture to verify what I am being taught. I will continue to do so. 🙂
Just what in your opinion has the Catholic church added to God’s word?

I think the Protestants have taken away from the word of God, literally by removing a subs
tantial part of the O.T.

And whether you admit it or not, you are a Protestant.

Where do you think the bible came from? Do you think the bible floated down from heaven KJV bound in black leather with the words of Christ in red letters?
 
I ‘man-made’. We would all become one faith…CHRISTIANITY. 🙂
Ok Thorwald I see exactly where you are coming from, I surmise that you are a Campbelite a member of the self named “churches of Christ”.

Who else would demand a specific command or example from the bible to establish whether a statement is true or not?

I came out of the same denomination and I remember very well the CENI beleif of churchachristers.

Command
Example
or
Neccasary Inference.

You can say you are “Christian only”, But that is just another part of “churchaChrist” parlence.

Been there, done that and found it extremely lacking.
 
I know what you believe (proof above), but the Catholic Church has added all kinds of ‘things’ to God’s Word, that were not witnessed by Christ or The Holy Ghost. Since Jesus Christ is ‘The Word in The Flesh’, I think I will follow His teachings, rather than ‘The Catholic Church’s’. I am commanded by scripture, to use the scripture to verify what I am being taught. I will continue to do so. 🙂
Just what in your opinion has the Catholic church added to God’s word?

I think the Protestants have taken away from the word of God, literally by removing a subs
tantial part of the O.T.

And whether you admit it or not, you are a Protestant.

Where do you think the bible came from? Do you think the bible floated down from heaven KJV bound in black leather with the words of Christ in red letters?
 
There is too much ‘junk’ above to respond to. In reference to Saul & Samuel, try reading the Chronicles. This is the scripture that I previously referenced, not Samuel. 🙂
You essentially did not read and ignored what I wrote 😦

My quotes from Samuel is to show you a passage exactly contradicts your scriptural description taken out of context. If you continue to stick to your claims, then you would be holding onto biblical contradictions.

In stubbornly taking individual passages out of context despite the contradictions, are you saying God’s words can contradict themselves? Or you are saying ignore Samuel and just read Chronicles for the real story? Or maybe you are saying there is no need to read the passages that differ from your own ideas? Or even passages in the context is irrelevant, only piece wise segments of text that Thorwald remember are worth while?

None of those description above suggests you would be exclusively and comprehensively following Christ words. That is a pick and choose tactic. If you do not open your mind there is not much to talk about. I guess you were just posting to read your own opening posts for your own self-grandization.

If you ever want to learn the whole bible, you can do various searches here. Damacus Road is a nice topic. Here is an article to start you out on one day when you decide to use your full spiritual and mental capacities.

A Third for Reverence.
%between%
 
Thank you for your (name removed by moderator)ut. My greatest fear, is following any doctrines/acts/beliefs, that are not specifically commanded of us by scripture. Aaron’s two sons were killed by God, for simply adding incense to an offering, because God had not commanded them to do so. In other words, their actions were interpreted by God, to be ‘false prophecy’ (changing His Word).

We have to remember, that if we change God’s Word (verbally, written, or by our acts), we are not only found to be disobedient, but others hearing/reading/seeing these things, may also do the same. This makes us a false prophet. If this happens, God is going to kill us (hell…lake of fire…eternal separation from God). I believe that I have the right, (if not also, the obligation) to fear anything that is taught unto me, that has no verification of its truth, per the scriptures. 🙂
Thorwald

This is an interesting position. I never thought about applying the prophetic element to our daily Christian walk in this way. That is really something to contemplate. If we as Christians are to model our lives on Christ and His three fold earthly ministry is Priestly, Kingly, and Prophetic ours should be as well.

I never thought of it this way. Thanks for your reply.

Peace

d.l.
 
What happened to Thorwald?

Still waiting for specific answers as to how we Catholics “added” to the word of God.
 
WOOPYDOO! I am so glad that you have ‘enlightened’ me. 🙂
Any time Thor. If you want to respond to anything, I’m happy to continue discussing the Catholic position with you.

Peace,
Robert
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top