Is the concept of God self-contradictory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If so why?
“Concept” implies something formed into mind. Not every one has formed concepts of God that are compatible with the concepts that others have formed. Trying to merge certain concepts can result in something self contradicting. And a concept that a specific person holds could be self contradicting.
 
If so why?
Tony:

It might help to describe a concept of God. Even our Christian associate posters may have erroneous notions.

Considering his determinants, none appear to be “self-contradictory” to me. But, they’re not new to me either.

God bless,
jd
 
I’ve heard some say the conjunction of the properties ‘immaterial’ and ‘omnipresence’ results in a contradiction. If God is immaterial, then he occupies no space. i.e., God isn’t anywhere. If God is omnipresent, then he is present everywhere. Therefore, to be immaterial and omnipresent is to both be nowhere and everywhere. But, I don’t put too much stock in this 😛
 
I’ve heard some say the conjunction of the properties ‘immaterial’ and ‘omnipresence’ results in a contradiction. If God is immaterial, then he occupies no space. i.e., God isn’t anywhere. If God is omnipresent, then he is present everywhere. Therefore, to be immaterial and omnipresent is to both be nowhere and everywhere. But, I don’t put too much stock in this 😛
It is hardly surprising that the Creator of the universe is not present in everything in the same way as physical objects. Where do you locate truth?
 
Tony:

It might help to describe a concept of God. Even our Christian associate posters may have erroneous notions.

Considering his determinants, none appear to be “self-contradictory” to me. But, they’re not new to me either.
How about Love? That should lead to some interesting reactions… 🙂
 
I’ve heard some say the conjunction of the properties ‘immaterial’ and ‘omnipresence’ results in a contradiction. If God is immaterial, then he occupies no space. i.e., God isn’t anywhere. If God is omnipresent, then he is present everywhere. Therefore, to be immaterial and omnipresent is to both be nowhere and everywhere. But, I don’t put too much stock in this 😛
Not so. The operative word is not “space,” rather, it is “place.” Place is best defined as the innermost surface of a surrounding body. To say that God holds no place is entirely correct. Why? Because only matter, i.e., that which is by its nature finite, will ever find itself surrounded.

God is Infinite (in all respects). To say that and include magnitude as a “respect,” is to say that such a thing can never find itself surrounded. But, neither can it find itself excluded. So, “space” is engulfed by infinity. But, not only engulfed, but also, permeated since infinity cannot be excluded.

Therefore, only that which is immaterial can be omnipresent.

There is no contradiction. None whatsoever.

God bless,
jd
 
Why is co-operation so important? Why would anybody want to go to hell?🤷 (Disclaimer: I am pretending to be an atheist by the way, i already know the answers to my questions. Just play along for fun)
(Your Disclaimer is discounted… because it is unnecessary. 🙂

Since no one would opt for undiluted misery hell must have its compensations. To be absolutely independent and master of one’s own destiny is the greatest temptation of all. We can already see how the lust for power in this world makes people commit diabolical crimes. The damned are in hell because of their pride and unwillingness to recognise and submit to a higher authority. They choose of their own free will to live for themselves, succumb to the lust for power and delight in being masters of their own destiny. They exist in “splendid” isolation because that is the only way in which they can express themselves with unrivalled freedom from “interference”. They derive great pleasure from rejecting the sovereignty of God and worshipping themselves but their pleasure brings them torment because they are never satisfied. Their obsession with themselves makes them incapable of escaping from themselves and sharing their life with others. The more freedom they have the more they want. The vicious spiral of selfishness and evil leads to a form of insanity in which they become incapable of loving anyone but themselves.

The only way in which the damned could escape from hell is to identify themselves with others. Only then would they cease to be slaves to themselves. The truth makes us free - and the truth is that we did not create ourselves. We are liberated by adoring our Creator in heaven, loving His children on earth… and having compassion for those in hell…
 
“Concept” implies something formed into mind. Not every one has formed concepts of God that are compatible with the concepts that others have formed. Trying to merge certain concepts can result in something self contradicting. And a concept that a specific person holds could be self contradicting.
The onus is on you to produce an allegedly self-contradictory concept that can be discussed.
 
(Your Disclaimer is discounted… because it is unnecessary. 🙂

Since no one would opt for undiluted misery hell must have its compensations. To be absolutely independent and master of one’s own destiny is the greatest temptation of all. We can already see how the lust for power in this world makes people commit diabolical crimes. The damned are in hell because of their pride and unwillingness to recognise and submit to a higher authority. They choose of their own free will to live for themselves, succumb to the lust for power and delight in being masters of their own destiny. They exist in “splendid” isolation because that is the only way in which they can express themselves with unrivalled freedom from “interference”. They derive great pleasure from rejecting the sovereignty of God and worshipping themselves but their pleasure brings them torment because they are never satisfied. Their obsession with themselves makes them incapable of escaping from themselves and sharing their life with others. The more freedom they have the more they want. The vicious spiral of selfishness and evil leads to a form of insanity in which they become incapable of loving anyone but themselves.

The only way in which the damned could escape from hell is to identify themselves with others. Only then would they cease to be slaves to themselves. The truth makes us free - and the truth is that we did not create ourselves. We are liberated by adoring our Creator in heaven, loving His children on earth… and having compassion for those in hell…
Tony:

That is the most inclusive statement of Reality that I’ve ever read. And, boy, you can say that again! In the late eighties, I was considered a millionaire. By the end of the eighties, I had lost it all, but, along the way, I bought lots of friends. Only, as it turns out, after becoming nearly destitute, I looked around to find NO friends. It’s amazing how lonely in can be at the top! It’s also funny that surrounded by “bought friends” there is no inkling of inclusion, only exclusion. So, everything you’ve said is absolutely true.

Fortunately, the Holy Spirit smiled on me and permitted me to re-gain God, which only took me 15 more years.

God bless,
jd
 
ThinkingSapien;8643436 said:
“Concept” implies something formed into mind. Not every one has formed concepts of God that are compatible with the concepts that others have formed. Trying to merge certain concepts can result in something self contradicting. And a concept that a specific person holds could be self contradicting.
The onus is on you to produce an allegedly self-contradictory concept that can be discussed.

It sounds like more information might be needed on where I am coming from. I find it necessary to point out that I am taking into consideration that there are multiple concepts of “God” and I am responding to your question as though it were “Are concepts of ‘God’ selc-contradictory?” I would be less inclined to do this had either a specific concept of God been spelled out and identified as the concept(s) of interest with all other (incompatible) concepts being excluded from the discussion.

As an example of concepts that two people have that don’t merge together would be the concept(s) of God held by a maltheistic person and a person that has a concept(s) of God being all good. As a less extreme example I could also begin to talk about contradicts that would arise from trying to merge the concepts of God known as “Allah” with the concepts of God known as “Yahweh” , or with the God concept that says that God came in five forms, Vishnu, Shiva, Devi, Surya and Ganesha. Note that I am still using the plural of “concepts” here. If I restrict consideration to either Yahweh or Allah or one of God’s 5 forms of the panchayatana puja then I find that there are still incompatible concepts supported by different people, such as those that affirm that Yahweh has not yet sent the “Messiah,” those that affirm he sent himself as Jesus, and those that affirm that Jesus was actually the angel Michael.
 
(Your Disclaimer is discounted… because it is unnecessary. 🙂

Since no one would opt for undiluted misery hell must have its compensations. To be absolutely independent and master of one’s own destiny is the greatest temptation of all. We can already see how the lust for power in this world makes people commit diabolical crimes. The damned are in hell because of their pride and unwillingness to recognise and submit to a higher authority. They choose of their own free will to live for themselves, succumb to the lust for power and delight in being masters of their own destiny. They exist in “splendid” isolation because that is the only way in which they can express themselves with unrivalled freedom from “interference”. They derive great pleasure from rejecting the sovereignty of God and worshipping themselves but their pleasure brings them torment because they are never satisfied. Their obsession with themselves makes them incapable of escaping from themselves and sharing their life with others. The more freedom they have the more they want. The vicious spiral of selfishness and evil leads to a form of insanity in which they become incapable of loving anyone but themselves.

The only way in which the damned could escape from hell is to identify themselves with others. Only then would they cease to be slaves to themselves. The truth makes us free - and the truth is that we did not create ourselves. We are liberated by adoring our Creator in heaven, loving His children on earth… and having compassion for those in hell…
Ever thought of writing a book on the subject?🍿
 
Now here’s a puzzler:

Why did God not give Satan a chance to be redeemed, as he gave humans that chance? 🍿
 
The concept of God is certainly not self-contradictory but logical necessity cannot lead to ontological necessity. Even though the probability that God doesn’t exist is negligible it is still a theoretical possibility. All our knowledge - except our inner experience - is based on inference and induction which do not lead to infallible conclusions like logical or mathematical proofs.
Perhaps I should have said that “if” God does exist, then He alone holds the ontological necessity of Being, since God by definition is the logical necessity. But on the other hand, if God does not exist, then it is probably ontologically beyond the bounds of possibility either that He may exist in the here and now or that He may come into existence later, because by definition God is not contingent upon anything. So, if God’s existence is at all possible, then His existence cannot be just barely possible; it must be totally possible. Therefore, God’s existence is not impossible, which is to say, God is logically necessary.

And also logic itself truly cannot have reality without the existence of a standard of truth, nor can mankind use logic without some sort of communication. The statement that God may not logically exist assumes without any proof that both logic and communication are things that simply evolved out of whole cloth. However, if nothing cannot have either existence or communication without God (from nothing, comes nothing), then logic is impossible without God as well; therefore, the non-existence of God is logically impossible, since logic is true only because logic reflects the nature of God.
 
If so why?
I think there is a possible self-contradiction in the idea that God is “pure being” or “pure act.” What is “pure being” w/o any qualities? It may as well be nothingness.
 
Since no one would opt for undiluted misery hell must have its compensations. To be absolutely independent and master of one’s own destiny is the greatest temptation of all. We can already see how the lust for power in this world makes people commit diabolical crimes. The damned are in hell because of their pride and unwillingness to recognise and submit to a higher authority. They choose of their own free will to live for themselves, succumb to the lust for power and delight in being masters of their own destiny. They exist in “splendid” isolation because that is the only way in which they can express themselves with unrivalled freedom from “interference”. They derive great pleasure from rejecting the sovereignty of God and worshipping themselves but their pleasure brings them torment because they are never satisfied. Their obsession with themselves makes them incapable of escaping from themselves and sharing their life with others. The more freedom they have the more they want. The vicious spiral of selfishness and evil leads to a form of insanity in which they become incapable of loving anyone but themselves.
I’ve spent too much time on it already without plunging further into the depths of depravity. :eek:

Here are a few more ideas on the subject :

There is always a price to pay for everything we are and possess. In hell the enjoyment of absolute independence is poisoned by a sense of isolation and inadequacy. To worship oneself is a form of insanity because no one except God is perfect. The Greek concept of Nemesis is still valid: our vices incur their own punishment. Self-love ultimately leads to self-loathing but it is like drug addiction: a fatal flaw in spite of the immense pleasure and satisfaction it gives - for a while…
 
Now here’s a puzzler:

Why did God not give Satan a chance to be redeemed, as he gave humans that chance?
He does! God’s infinite love is not the obstacle but Satan’s decisions to love himself more than God. It would be unjust if Satan were deprived of his free will on account of the finite choices he has made and presumably is making. A creature’s eternal destiny is never irrevocably determined by God because He respects our power of self-determination and knows our capacity for love can never be entirely obliterated. It is a mistake to think we are fossilised in the afterlife and incapable of making decisions - even in hell!
 
I think there is a possible self-contradiction in the idea that God is “pure being” or “pure act.” What is “pure being” w/o any qualities? It may as well be nothingness.
Pure Being is the antithesis of nothingness because it is dynamic. “Pure Love” is a more meaningful term because “Being” is an abstraction which conveys the false impression you have received. 🙂
 
  • Since no one would opt for undiluted misery hell must have its compensations. To be absolutely independent and master of one’s own destiny is the greatest temptation of all. We can already see how the lust for power in this world makes people commit diabolical crimes. The damned are in hell because of their pride and unwillingness to recognise and submit to a higher authority. They choose of their own free will to live for themselves, succumb to the lust for power and delight in being masters of their own destiny. They exist in “splendid” isolation because that is the only way in which they can express themselves with unrivalled freedom from “interference”. They derive great pleasure from rejecting the sovereignty of God and worshipping themselves but their pleasure brings them torment because they are never satisfied. Their obsession with themselves makes them incapable of escaping from themselves and sharing their life with others. The more freedom they have the more they want. The vicious spiral of selfishness and evil leads to a form of insanity in which they become incapable of loving anyone but themselves.
Thank you for those kind and poignant words, jd, but my statement gives only one side of the picture. It is notoriously more difficult to describe heaven than hell!
In the late eighties, I was considered a millionaire. By the end of the eighties, I had lost it all, but, along the way, I bought lots of friends. Only, as it turns out, after becoming nearly destitute, I looked around to find NO friends. It’s amazing how lonely in can be at the top! It’s also funny that surrounded by “bought friends” there is no inkling of inclusion, only exclusion. So, everything you’ve said is absolutely true.
Fortunately, the Holy Spirit smiled on me and permitted me to re-gain God, which only took me 15 more years.
God bless,
jd
It was not for nothing that Jesus said “Blessed are the poor…”

I lived in Africa for a long time and noticed the poor are far happier than the wealthy because they have one another - not isolated in a prison of their own making by their high walls, alarm system and guard dogs! A mud hut without a door gives you more freedom than a mansion with a marble floor…

God bless

Tony
 
Pure Being is the antithesis of nothingness because it is dynamic. “Pure Love” is a more meaningful term because “Being” is an abstraction which conveys the false impression you have received. 🙂
But, God is more than Love, right? Else, what is there to love?

What is dynamic is variegated. In other words, God isn’t just this absolutely simple being with no multifacetedness within its own nature.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top