A
Art321
Guest
I agree with you that Luther did not want to start a new Church, and in fact, never saw himself as doing that. He wanted to bring the experience of faith back to the Gospel he read in the pages of Scripture.
**I was actually reading up on Luther as I felt that I didn’t know enough about him. It turns out that this is actually true. He never intended to start a new Church, yet I do believe that some of his interpretations of Scripture were off. **
I think it is important not to feed into Protestant mischaracterizations of the Church. The Church never taught that people had to work and pay for their salvation. There were many clerics who were corrupt, and those who were charged with teaching the faith were misrepresenting it for reasons of greed. While I will agree that this misrepresentation was being taught, this fault should not be laid at the feet of the Holy Bride of Christ, but to those corrupted persons attached to her. This was especially rampant where Luther lived.
The “movement” is much too big to respond to in this context. I think the mistake that Luther made was that he did not distinguish between the Holy Bride of Christ, and the corrupted leadership to which he reacted. He conflated the role and purpose of the successor of Peter with the self centered pesons who occupied the office. He could not look beyond the persons misrepresenting the faith to the Doctrine of the Faith that is unsullied by them.
**Yes, this is something that I was trying to say when I said of Luther’s heresy! While there was widespread corruption within the Church and many were selling indulgences in the name of paying for your salvation. Something that truly goes against the meaning of being Catholic… May I ask your source with this issue?? As you can see these misconceptions ran crazy to our present day. As I was saying, he didn’t separate the persons with the offices of Bishops and the Papacy. Thank you! You expressed this far better than me! **