Is the term "Protestant" derogatory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NFrancis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That I’m not protesting anything, but that Catholics and Orthodox both have doctrines I can’t swallow? Hmm. A lot of Protestant denominations also have doctrines I can’t swallow, as do nearly all non-Christian religions (Zen and Taoism don’t require you to believe very much, and mostly eschew doctrine). Most political parties have doctrines I can’t swallow as well. I’m not seeing where there’s a contradiction. Nobody can believe everything.
Therefore I protest Islam because I don’t accept their prophet, I protest Hinduism because I don’t accept their gods, and so on.

You protest Catholicism because you deny that you need to eat the flesh and drink the blood of Christ in the Eucharist or even be there when it happens.
 
Dear Swiss,

it is what it is. A protest against the Papacy; a protest against all things Marian; a protest against Confession to a priest; a protest concerning the true and real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist; a protest about the number of books in the Bible…and it goes on and on.

It is what it is…protestation against the One, True church that Christ intended to exist after His ascension into heaven, and of which He left Peter as it’s first pope…264 popes later to Pope Benedict XVI…and the gates of hell have not and will not prevail against her.

May God grant long life and health to Pope Benedict XVI - De Gloria Olivae.
I agree. 🙂
 
Beg to differ, Lutherans are not the same as other so called Protestant Churches. We are really Evangelical Catholics. We have the same right to the word Catholic as the Roman Catholic Church. Zwingli was the father of Anabaptist Churches and John Calvin was the father of Reform Churches and to a certain extent a heavy influence on Church of England.
Their views of the Eurchast is completely different from Lutherans among other things.
You have this mixed up. Zwingli was the father of the ReformedChurch in Switzerland in the German speaking regions (mainly Zurich), while Calvin and Knox were everywhere else. Zwingli was not the father of the Anabaptists. I used to like the idea of being called Evangelical Catholic when I was Lutheran in theology, but it is a contradiction, as Evangelical (evangelische in german) means Protestant, while Catholic is Catholic. But you’re right on the views of the Mass.

God bless. 🙂
 
You’re probably aware of the John Donne stanza, which I gather Elizabeth I was quite taken by, that the eucharist is “what God makes it” (and I give thanks and take it). That, of course, does not rule out transubstantiation.
Yep. It’s often attributed to her. And certainly it doesn’t rule out transubstantiation as an explanation of the Real Presence, that the elements are, after consecration by proper persons, in proper manner, the body and blood, soul and divinity of Christ, if one were looking for an exposition of how the wheels are going around. I don’t have a better one, for sure. But then, it is fortunate that, as Lewis has a character say in LETTERS TO MALCOLM, the instructions were “Take, eat”, not “Take, understand”. Even if one accepts transubstantiation as such an explanation, one is left with a mystery.

GKC
 
Show me where in the Bible it says to build a church building. This is what the Apostles did:

The Temple no longer exists, so if you truly practice sola scriptura you would have to worship at home and sell the church building to feed the poor.

Church buildings come from the Sacred Tradition of the Catholic Church and are part of your debt to her. Along with the Bible.
If one’s communion truly practices sola scriptura, whether or not said communion builds a building is not a doctinal issue. Since the choice to do so or not is not a doctrinal issue, sola scriptura is irrelevent.

That Lutherans recognize and in fact cherish what we’ve received from the Universal Church, both east and west, can be summed up by the following quote:
“We concede—as we must—that so much of what they [the Catholic Church] say is true: that the papacy has God’s word and the office of the apostles, and that we have received holy scriptures, baptism, the sacrament, and the pulpit from them. What would we know of these if it were not for them?” -Luther
Jon
 
Therefore I protest Islam because I don’t accept their prophet, I protest Hinduism because I don’t accept their gods, and so on.

You protest Catholicism because you deny that you need to eat the flesh and drink the blood of Christ in the Eucharist or even be there when it happens.
Ah, so we’re both Protestants! 😛

My issues with Catholicism are more about the authority of the Pope. I don’t believe he’s the legitimate leader of all Christianity, but only of his own faction. I do believe in the Eucharist and in the Real Presence, though my understanding of the Real Presence is more Lutheran, and I think it’s valid anywhere believers are gathered, not just where there’s a Catholic priest to officiate, because the priesthood of all believers suffices.
 
Is it bad to use the term “Protestant”? On another thread someone said that it was. I have never thought of it as such and am wondering if I should continue using the term. If it is derogatory should I use non-Catholic Christians instead or something else?
When I was on the BBC “Christian topic” forum, the moderators deleted one of my posts because I used the word “Proddy”. I got them to change their minds. Proddy might once have been derogatory, but isn’t really now. We were called Proddies (or Prods) by the RCs in Ireland, and would also use the word to desribe ourselves. (A similar scenario applies to the word Pom in Aus, describing someone English).

Unfortunately in Scotland you occasionally see graffiti about “Proddie dogs” or worse (but not in the north of Ireland since graffiti removal has become a fast and efficient industry there).

When I was with some Jewish people I referred to myself as “goy” only to be told off. “You should never use that word; it’s offensive”!
 
We do not protest against the one true church. We consider ourselves members of it. We do not protest against your orders or consider them invalid. But you protest against ours.

Similarly we acknowledge our debt to our (older) beloved sister church.
 
Ah, so we’re both Protestants! 😛

My issues with Catholicism are more about the authority of the Pope. I don’t believe he’s the legitimate leader of all Christianity, but only of his own faction. I do believe in the Eucharist and in the Real Presence, though my understanding of the Real Presence is more Lutheran, and I think it’s valid anywhere believers are gathered, not just where there’s a Catholic priest to officiate, because the priesthood of all believers suffices.
I have a Quick Answer for all of that, actually.
 
If one’s communion truly practices sola scriptura, whether or not said communion builds a building is not a doctinal issue. Since the choice to do so or not is not a doctrinal issue, sola scriptura is irrelevent.
As a Fundamentalist would say, that is still adding something to the Bible that is not there. The Lutheran understanding of SS is closer to Prima Scriptura, thus non-Scriptural authority like the Lutheran confessions are also used. That’s why Fundamentalists like Luther but not Lutherans, because in their view you are still too Catholic with your so-called “traditions of men.”
 
We do not protest against the one true church. We consider ourselves members of it.
And I consider myself the eggman and the walrus. Does that make me the eggman or the walrus?
We do not protest against your orders or consider them invalid. But you protest against ours.
In what way?
 
As a Fundamentalist would say, that is still adding something to the Bible that is not there. The Lutheran understanding of SS is closer to Prima Scriptura, thus non-Scriptural authority like the Lutheran confessions are also used. That’s why Fundamentalists like Luther but not Lutherans, because in their view you are still too Catholic with your so-called “traditions of men.”
Hi Cat,
I don’t think Luther would object to using the Lutheran confessions. Afterall, some of his writings make up part of it.

Jon
 
Hi Cat,
I don’t think Luther would object to using the Lutheran confessions. Afterall, some of his writings make up part of it.

Jon
So then it is just a question of whose tradition is better. Not whether or not to have tradition, as every church does. That’s the point.
 
So then it is just a question of whose tradition is better. Not whether or not to have tradition, as every church does. That’s the point.
Not better. Which (not whose, as you and I share many of the same) Traditions rightly reflect scripture, the final norm. That’s the point.

Jon
 
Therefore I** protest Islam** because I don’t accept their prophet, I** protest Hinduism** because I don’t accept their gods, and so on.

You protest Catholicism because you deny that you need to eat the flesh and drink the blood of Christ in the Eucharist or even be there when it happens.
So you’re really a Protestant too?🙂 I mean…since we’re choosing to define our own particular term…you’re Protestatn!🙂
 
And I consider myself the eggman and the walrus. Does that make me the eggman or the walrus?

In what way?
I’m pretty sure you are not the egg man. You didn’t say goo goo g’joob.

OTOH, you might be Mrs. Robinson.

GKC
 
Not better. Which (not whose, as you and I share many of the same) Traditions rightly reflect scripture, the final norm. That’s the point.

Jon
Rightly reflecting according to whose judgment?
But here is the bigger problem: Jesus promised that His Word would never pass away. If any teaching of Jesus passed away then He didn’t keep His promise. So if Luther comes up 1,500 years later and says that the “papists” corrupted the teachings of Jesus, then Jesus allowed the Church to go without His Word for a time. Does that sound like something that God would do?
 
I’m pretty sure you are not the egg man. You didn’t say goo goo g’joob.

OTOH, you might be Mrs. Robinson.

GKC
So then there are objective characteristics for eggman-ship. I can’t just walk up to the grocer and say I am the eggman, give me all your eggs.

What then is the authority for lay Christians to celebrate the Lord’s Supper? Not the Bible, as no one who is a non-elder is ever shown doing so.
 
So then there are objective characteristics for eggman-ship. I can’t just walk up to the grocer and say I am the eggman, give me all your eggs.

What then is the authority for lay Christians to celebrate the Lord’s Supper? Not the Bible, as no one who is a non-elder is ever shown doing so.
Hmm. Let’s search for a person who holds that a lay Christian can confect the sacrament of the eucharist. And sort him out properly.

Our two priests are out of town this coming Sunday. So our deacon (not a layman, but not ordained to confect the sacrament) will distribute the Mass of the Pre-Sanctified.

GKC
 
Rightly reflecting according to whose judgment?
But here is the bigger problem: Jesus promised that His Word would never pass away. If any teaching of Jesus passed away then He didn’t keep His promise. So if Luther comes up 1,500 years later and says that the “papists” corrupted the teachings of Jesus, then Jesus allowed the Church to go without His Word for a time. Does that sound like something that God would do?
So, you are saying that what happens here on earth affects the Church Triumphant too? If men of the CC, or Orthodox, or any other group improperly understand the teachings of Christ for a time, that doesn’t in any way mean that Christ didn’t keep His promise to His Church, unless one thinks His Church doesn’t include the Church Triumphant, and if you choose to include it, the Church Suffering.
Christ’s promise remains, regardless of the sinful nature of men on earth.

Jon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top