I
Isa_Almisry
Guest
A lot of recent apologetics for veneration of the Mother of God revolves around the idea of her as the Queen Mother of the OT. For an instance of this, contrast I Kings (III Kingdoms LXX) 1:15 “So Bathshe’ba went to the king [David] into his chamber … 16 Bathshe’ba bowed and did obeisance to the king,” with 2:12 So Solomon sat upon the throne of David his father; and his kingdom was firmly established… 19 So Bathshe’ba went to King Solomon, … And the king rose to meet her, and bowed down to her; then he sat on his throne, and had a seat brought for the king’s mother; and she sat on his right.
It makes sense, but is there any patristics in support of this interpretation, or is it of recent vintage?
In the Divine Liturgies of St. John Chrysostom and St. Basil, in preparation of the Eucharist, the fraction representing the Theotokos is put on the paten on the right of the Lamb while the priest recites Psalm 44 (45):10 “The Queen stood at Thy right hand.” So I know that there was some idea of it, but would like more from the Fathers on it.
It makes sense, but is there any patristics in support of this interpretation, or is it of recent vintage?
In the Divine Liturgies of St. John Chrysostom and St. Basil, in preparation of the Eucharist, the fraction representing the Theotokos is put on the paten on the right of the Lamb while the priest recites Psalm 44 (45):10 “The Queen stood at Thy right hand.” So I know that there was some idea of it, but would like more from the Fathers on it.