Is the word "Protestant' obsolete?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IGotQuestions
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The various non-Catholic denominations differ in doctrine and practice. Their differences are not solely with the Catholic Church. Perhaps that’s one reason why they’re reluctant to identify themselves as Protestants so as to avoid confusion.
 
The various non-Catholic denominations differ in doctrine and practice. Their differences are not solely with the Catholic Church. Perhaps that’s one reason why they’re reluctant to identify themselves as Protestants so as to avoid confusion.
You just nailed it. 👍

Jon
 
Well…while some Christians still call themselves Protestants, I think many others prefer to identify themselves by the name of their respective denominations.
If it were up to me, I will wish for all Christians to simply identify themselves as “Christians”…but that won’t be possible because some Christians do not even consider Catholics as Christians while some other groups of “Christians” have weird anti-Christian believes, some even refuting Jesus’ divinity.
I honestly don’t know how on earth we go to this point in time of so much disorder among God’s people but I hope one day we would all truly be one people.🙂
 
I used to call myself Protestant. I heard the term used by others in my denomination. I would more likely use the name of my denomination. It could be that I was in an old mainline denomination. But there was not an idea that the word was without meaning. The discussion reminds me of Chesterton:
Thus when Mr. H. G. Wells says (as he did somewhere), ‘All chairs are quite different’, he utters not merely a misstatement, but a contradiction in terms. If all chairs were quite different, you could not call them ‘all chairs’.
Protestant does mean something. It does tell us something. Not wanting to self describe as the term also tells us something. The issue, it seems to me, is that, quite understandably, no one wants to be anything but ‘the Church’ or ‘Catholic’.
 
I’m remembering some questions that have come up – here, on Catholic Answers, in personal conversations — ‘So what do Protestants believe about: the Mass, or the Church Fathers, or birth control, or you name it.’
Yes, I have to concede your point there. But, as you also alluded to, some people will actually substitute the word “non-catholic”. Back in the day, it seemed that this was usually in a joking fashion (vis-a-vis
  • What’s your religion?
  • Oh, you know, non-Catholic. 😉
etc.) but nowadays, wellllll …

P.S. Btw do you object to being described as “catholic and protestant” (or “Catholic and Protestant” if you prefer)?
 
I used to call myself Protestant. I heard the term used by others in my denomination. I would more likely use the name of my denomination. It could be that I was in an old mainline denomination. But there was not an idea that the word was without meaning. The discussion reminds me of Chesterton:

Protestant does mean something. It does tell us something. Not wanting to self describe as the term also tells us something. The issue, it seems to me, is that, quite understandably, no one wants to be anything but ‘the Church’ or ‘Catholic’.
ORTHODOXY, first American edition, chap. 3, p. 60.
 
Protestant does mean something. It does tell us something. Not wanting to self describe as the term also tells us something. The issue, it seems to me, is that, quite understandably, no one wants to be anything but ‘the Church’ or ‘Catholic’.
Protestant does mean something. It does have a meaning. It’s meaning comes from its origin, but it has also taken on the contemporary meaning of, simply, western non-Catholic Christian. Beyond these two things, not much of a meaning.

As for wanting to be called, “the Church”, it is not only understandable, but accurate. As for wanting to be called Catholic, not all feel that way, and wish to avoid the title, while for some, such as myself, it has always been and remains the correct title. Wanting it or not wanting it is irrelevant. Not all Catholics are in communion with the Bishop or Rome, though many are.

Jon
 
ORTHODOXY, first American edition, chap. 3, p. 60.
Right, it went along with Heretics. In matters of belief you have the orthodox and heretics.
As for wanting to be called, “the Church”, it is not only understandable, but accurate. As for wanting to be called Catholic, not all feel that way, and wish to avoid the title, while for some, such as myself, it has always been and remains the correct title. Wanting it or not wanting it is irrelevant. Not all Catholics are in communion with the Bishop or Rome, though many are.
Some may want to avoid the word Catholic in as much as they see it tied to what they perceive as the Catholic Church, or ‘Roman Catholic Church’. What I meant was the word catholic in the sense of universal. I see that as being more like ‘the Church’. Would anyone not want to be considered universal? Even in this age of relativism isn’t it true that any given group at least perceives its teaching to be the core or most true understanding of the Faith?
 
Right, it went along with Heretics. In matters of belief you have the orthodox and heretics.

Some may want to avoid the word Catholic in as much as they see it tied to what they perceive as the Catholic Church, or ‘Roman Catholic Church’. What I meant was the word catholic in the sense of universal. I see that as being more like ‘the Church’. Would anyone not want to be considered universal? Even in this age of relativism isn’t it true that any given group at least perceives its teaching to be the core or most true understanding of the Faith?
Some groups, I’d agree. But I’d say that unless the core is conceived as relativism, it is not necessarily true that any given group perceives its teaching as the core of the Faith. Unless the core be conceived as relativistic, non-judgmental acceptance of almost any manifestation of the Faith.
 
When I was a Protestant I had no idea what I was “protesting”. 😃

Originally applied to the English and Lutheran breakaways now it encompasses 20000+ other denominations. I prefer to use the descriptor “separated brethren”.
In all fairness most of those divisions are jurisdictional rather than theological. Its important to avoid straw men in argument and get to the heart of things (denial of the magisterium and authority).
 
Protestant does mean something. It does have a meaning. It’s meaning comes from its origin, but it has also taken on the contemporary meaning of, simply, western non-Catholic Christian. Beyond these two things, not much of a meaning.
*
As for wanting to be called, “the Church”, it is not only understandable, but accurate.* As for wanting to be called Catholic, not all feel that way, and wish to avoid the title, while for some, such as myself, it has always been and remains the correct title. Wanting it or not wanting it is irrelevant. Not all Catholics are in communion with the Bishop or Rome, though many are.

Jon
I would agree with people wanting to be called “the Church”, they should be so called. I have difficulty with any church identifying specifically as Catholic, if they are not in communion with the pope.

A category is useful if you can show who is in the category, and who is not. There are many Christian groups who more or less have common features with Catholicism: sacraments, services that are similar to Catholic Mass, authoritative tradition, veneration for Mary and saints, orders and apostolic succession sometimes considered as “valid”, by the pope, and/or by others; and other potential criteria. Stretch out the line broadly enough, almost all Christian bodies could be considered a little bit, or a lot Catholic, on some dimension or other.

If a word can mean almost anything, it ends up meaning almost nothing. That’s why I prefer the On/Off switch rather than a dimmer switch or a whole series of dimmer switches. If a church body is in communion with the pope, they are Catholic. That doesn’t mean PNCC, Anglicans, and dozens of groups using the word are not holy, sometimes more so than us papists, or than a given pope himself. I simply plead for clear communication. The Magisterium isn’t just one more variable, or a dimension you can buy into more or less. It’s something you are under; or not.
 
I am perfectly content to call all baptized genuine (i.e. word & deed) believers in Jesus Christ (as Son of God and our savior) members of the Body of Christ. I am fine with this being the “Catholic” Church.

I recently had a thought - this is a good way to look at it, IMHO.

Roman Catholic/Orthodox = Brahmin
Other Denominations = the lower stratum (I’ll just leave it at that, no need to break it down further)
Are there untouchables? Open question. Those that reject God.
 
I rarely meet anyone who refers to themselves in this way.
In general wouldn’t protestant meaning member of a branch of Protestantism? This category might be used on a survey. I have seen Mainline Protestant and Evangelical Protestant categories of surveys, for example there are 23 mainline and 146 Evangelical Protestant denominations in the 2010 survey by the ARDA.
thearda.com/rcms2010/mainline.asp
thearda.com/rcms2010/evangelical.asp
thearda.com/Archive/Browse.asp

Enclopedia Britania has:
Along with Anglicanism, the Reformed and Presbyterian (Calvinist) churches, Methodism, and the Baptist churches, Lutheranism is one of the five major branches of Protestantism.
 
In general wouldn’t protestant meaning member of a branch of Protestantism? This category might be used on a survey. I have seen Mainline Protestant and Evangelical Protestant categories of surveys, for example there are 23 mainline and 146 Evangelical Protestant denominations in the 2010 survey by the ARDA.
thearda.com/rcms2010/mainline.asp
thearda.com/rcms2010/evangelical.asp
thearda.com/Archive/Browse.asp

Enclopedia Britania has:
Along with Anglicanism, the Reformed and Presbyterian (Calvinist) churches, Methodism, and the Baptist churches, Lutheranism is one of the five major branches of Protestantism.
So interesting, in 2010 there were 169 Protestant denominations. I have read on CAF numbers like 20 - 40,000. The survey is probably more accurate!
 
So interesting, in 2010 there were 169 Protestant denominations. I have read on CAF numbers like 20 - 40,000. The survey is probably more accurate!
The 20,000+ figures come from a particular academic study, which is on-going, and counts things in an idiosyncratic manner.

It frequently gets discussed and explained around here.
 
The 20,000+ figures come from a particular academic study, which is on-going, and counts things in an idiosyncratic manner.

It frequently gets discussed and explained around here.
Schadenfreude.

😉
 
So interesting, in 2010 there were 169 Protestant denominations. I have read on CAF numbers like 20 - 40,000. The survey is probably more accurate!
Some are not Trinitarian, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses (from Adventism) and Unitarian-Universalists (from UCC/Congregational), and General Conference of the Church of God (Seventh Day) in binatarian and other Church of God (Seventh Day) groups are unitarian, United Church of God, and the Living Church of God, Christadelphians, Christian Scientists, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Dawn Bible Students, Friends General Conference, Iglesia ni Cristo, Living Church of God, Oneness Pentecostals, Members Church of God International, The Way International, The Church of God International and the United Church of God.

So, they may be included in surveys but are not strictly Christian per the dogma established at early councils of Nicea (325 A.D.) and First Constantinople (381 A.D.).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top