Is there superiority of Traditional Latin Mass over 'regular Mass'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erundil
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whatever, I really don’t care. This whole thing is becoming repetitive and boring. And I will need to actually pay exclusive attention to my work for a time soon. Not sure how soon or how long at the moment, but it is definitely coming up.
 
There is far more prayer in the EF Mass so I believe it’s superior. There is more prayer in a 15 decade rosary than a standard 5 decade rosary so I believe the 15 is superior as well.
 
If the TLM Mass was superior in any way, don’t you think it would be the regular, ordinary, Mass offered everyday by the Pope and bishops and priests throughout the world?

The Extraordinary Form is a specialized form of the Mass that is offered by a tiny fraction of priests. Perhaps one to 100, I would guess. Eastern Catholic Divine Liturgy is probably 1 to 1,000.

All three forms of worship are fine, none are better than another, just preferences of those attending.

The videos you are watching have a conservative bent, where nearly all of those who enjoy the EF would be found.

Rad trads like to represent that those attending EF are holier, more devout, more serious Catholics, or more obedient Catholics.

Some of those worshippers are more pious than some of those attending OF. But that’s incidental, and not indicative of anything.

The best form of worship is whatever one gets you to attend the most often.

Your thread is really the equivalent of is Pepsi better than Coke? Or Chevy, Ford, or Dodge?

All worship due to Christ our True God, risen from the dead,
Deacon Christopher
 
And here we have a test case. An assertion of superiority of one form over another, but without any rude or otherwise objectionable content. How about we all come back tomorrow or the next day and see if the post is still here? And all promise not to flag it in order for the test to be fair. I so promise.
 
You are not a very good chess player, are you.
I don’t consider the Faith a game of any sort.

And I am decent, if not particularly outstanding, at chess. Don’t have the time to spend practicing and studying.
 
So that’s why the reference to a document confused me so. Never saw the post with the article referenced whether it was pulled or not.
 
I find this one too hostile to trust.
Did I not just say that I am not one to throw flags over minor disagreements or issues? I feel as if I have received far more hostility than I have given.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top