B
benedictgal
Guest
Actually, the Mass was not simply just the consecration in Apostolic times. Both the Didache and St. Paul’s First Letter to the Conrinthians give us a glimpse of what happened (sadly, his epistle was also the first documented case of liturgical abuse in the New Testament). Even at the Last Supper, psalms were chanted and the rituals were performed, only, in this case, they received their authentic fulfillment because the True Lamb of God was present and performed the rites himself.I see where I got confused now
You’re right, it did not say that the Eucharist cannot be consecrated outside of a Eucharistic Celebration, but as per Canon Law, it is forbidden no matter what
I wonder why is it so? Is this just to make sure there’s no contrary law to The Last Supper? Or perhaps because in the first few years of the ministry of the Apostles, there was not structured Liturgical celebration. So the Law wouldn’t be contrary to history, but makes sure that going forward we do it the right way given were we are today with the celebration of Mass?