Is this not strange.

[traillius]

Atheists will say there is no evidence, even though what they mean is that they won’t accept the conclusions drawn from available evidence, if those conclusions are in support of a deity, or at least the christian deity. They say they are against all religions, yet they mostly attack christianity. I don’t believe the " its the most common " argument. In fact, they use the acts of muslim extremists as ammunition against christianity, or attempt to parallel the two. Although they deny it, almost all of the atheists are probably either rebelling against their parents, or else responding to what a person has done to them, who happens to be christian. Its unlikely that islam, judaism, or eastern religions turned them off from religion, or that they view those other religions as a threat, since they dwell on " what is most prevalent." They probably don’t know this, but they attack christianity actually because it is centered on Jesus. Not the historical jesus only, but the Jesus who died and yet lives, and will come again. I am sure the responses, some of them, will be non-agreeing.

 

[AntiTheist]

Atheists will say there is no evidence, even though what they mean is that they won’t accept the conclusions drawn from available evidence, if those conclusions are in support of a deity, or at least the christian deity.

Well, we can start here. What “evidence” do you think points clearly and undeniably towards the existence of the Christian god Jehovah and/or his avatar, the supposed Jesus of Nazareth? Please explain your answer fully.

EDIT: For ease of conversation, it would perhaps be best if you presented your strongest piece of evidence first (or at most, two or three pieces of evidence).

 

[traillius]

Well, we can start here. What “evidence” do you think points clearly and undeniably towards the existence of the Christian god Jehovah and/or his avatar, the supposed Jesus of Nazareth? Please explain your answer fully.

EDIT: For ease of conversation, it would perhaps be best if you presented your strongest piece of evidence first (or at most, two or three pieces of evidence).

It would be best, but since the evidence comes from people that you might claim have a comfirmation bias, or some agenda driven method of collecting and documenting evidence, I am not sure which to give. But let me think about which to give.