Is this protestant baptism valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Convert_in_99
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Convert_in_99

Guest
I attended a protestant family member’s baptism. The minister said “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Then the candidate was immersed completely one time into the baptismal pool. Would the catholic church recognize this as a valid baptism?
 
Assuming you are not using the word “valid” to mean “sacramental,” then, yes, it is valid. As in, if the blessed child ever decides to come home to the Church, he or she will be considered an already baptized Christian.
 
Speaking of complete immersion, one of my nephews was baptized at a Catholic church with a walk-in baptistery. I thought this was the coolest thing. He was an infant, so a smaller attached font was used.
 
Baptism is a sacrament, and therefore cannot be “valid” and at the same time “not sacramental.”
 
I attended a protestant family member’s baptism. The minister said “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Then the candidate was immersed completely one time into the baptismal pool. Would the catholic church recognize this as a valid baptism?
Generally, yes. But it depends upon just which type of Protestant sect you’re referencing. The majority of Protestant communities have valid baptisms, but some have beliefs about the Father Son & Holy Spirit that are so far removed from Trinitarian dogma that they can’t be considered valid baptisms.
 
This made me question the immersion part too. Someone please clarify for me if Catholics just immerse the person once or if that also has too be 3 times like the pouring.Thanks
 
Don’t mean to hijack this thread but this brings to mind the time I saw a local Methodist baptism on television where the minister said "I baptize you in the name of the Creator, the Redeemer and the Sustainer. Always wondered if it was valid.
 
I attended a protestant family member’s baptism. The minister said “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Then the candidate was immersed completely one time into the baptismal pool. Would the catholic church recognize this as a valid baptism?
Yes.
 
Don’t mean to hijack this thread but this brings to mind the time I saw a local Methodist baptism on television where the minister said "I baptize you in the name of the Creator, the Redeemer and the Sustainer. Always wondered if it was valid.
That is invalid. The correct baptismal formula is “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit/Ghost”.
 
I attended a protestant family member’s baptism. The minister said “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Then the candidate was immersed completely one time into the baptismal pool. Would the catholic church recognize this as a valid baptism?
Like Father David already said, it depends on whether the church in question has a correct theology on the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. For example, Mormons baptize “in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost”, but they have a different theology than traditional Christianity as to who the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are. Therefore, their baptism is invalid, because it’s as if they are referring to a different Father, Son, and Holy Spirit than us. This is part of the “intent” for baptism.

Which Protestant church is this? As long as they believe in the traditional Trinity, it was valid.
 
Generally, yes. But it depends upon just which type of Protestant sect you’re referencing. The majority of Protestant communities have valid baptisms, but some have beliefs about the Father Son & Holy Spirit that are so far removed from Trinitarian dogma that they can’t be considered valid baptisms.
I would classify them as Evangelical. They believe as we do on the Trinity. If for some reason this was not valid, would they at least enjoy the favor of Baptism of Desire? Also my husband was also baptized in the above manner. The priest who married us considered us to be two baptized Christians entering into a mixed sacramental marriage. If for some reason this baptism proved invalid, would our marriage then be invalid? I also worry if my mental illness was an impediment to our marriage (my husband knew of it, but not sure if the priest did or not) and that maybe that our marriage isn’t valid because of that too? You have to forgive me Father. I have OCD and am very scrupulous and want everything to be right before God. I just want everyone to get to heaven and have such an intense overwhelming fear of me or those I love going to hell.
 
I would classify them as Evangelical. They believe as we do on the Trinity. If for some reason this was not valid, would they at least enjoy the favor of Baptism of Desire? Also my husband was also baptized in the above manner. The priest who married us considered us to be two baptized Christians entering into a mixed sacramental marriage. If for some reason this baptism proved invalid, would our marriage then be invalid? I also worry if my mental illness was an impediment to our marriage (my husband knew of it, but not sure if the priest did or not) and that maybe that our marriage isn’t valid because of that too? You have to forgive me Father. I have OCD and am very scrupulous and want everything to be right before God. I just want everyone to get to heaven and have such an intense overwhelming fear of me or those I love going to hell.
Most evangalical protestant baptisms are valid–so long as they use water and the Trinitarian formula. Since the priest who married you did investigate the matter, and concluded that it was a valid baptism, I would not question that (and in fact, I would counsel anyone against questioning it)–saying that the baptism was invalid has a very high standard indeed.

Remember that all marriages enjoy the favor of the law. Since your marriage took place before a Catholic priest, there is no question that the marriage was valid, unless and until a marriage tribunal actually declares the marriage null–and that only happens if one or the other party requests such an investigation. I would suggest that you please put thoughts that your marriage might not be valid completely from your mind–that’s only the scrupulosity speaking.
 
I attended a protestant family member’s baptism. The minister said “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Then the candidate was immersed completely one time into the baptismal pool. Would the catholic church recognize this as a valid baptism?
It would need to be looked into on a detailed case by case basis.
 
Generally, yes. But it depends upon just which type of Protestant sect you’re referencing. The majority of Protestant communities have valid baptisms, but some have beliefs about the Father Son & Holy Spirit that are so far removed from Trinitarian dogma that they can’t be considered valid baptisms.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh,I feel the same too
 
I attended a protestant family member’s baptism. The minister said “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Then the candidate was immersed completely one time into the baptismal pool. Would the catholic church recognize this as a valid baptism?
I haven’t seen this mentioned yet, but, did the minister immerse the one being baptized while pronouncing the words, or did the minister do that after saying the words? If the candidate was not immersed until after the words were pronounced, I would say that the baptism may be doubtful.
Roman Catechism:
Pastors should be particularly careful to observe that the baptismal ablution is not to be applied indifferently to any part of the body, but principally to the head, which is the seat of all the internal and external senses; and also that he who baptises is to pronounce the sacramental words which constitute the form, not before or after, but when performing the ablution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top