O
Ora_et_Labora_1
Guest
Now while I know that when in doubt if something is a sin or not the best action to pursue is to bring it up during confession, none the less I will bring up the question here, to get some insight.
I worked for a time at a local branch of a donut franchise. At the end of the day we had to throw out ALL the donuts and bagels that were left over. This bothered me immensely, especially considering the quantities that were going into the garbage day after day. I got to think about all the wasted flour, eggs, sugar, etc that were not going to hungry people and ending up making snacks that eventually were not eaten. So, shortly thereafter, I began to give clients more than they would ask for (without making it perceptible to them while they were still in the store), just so that I would not be throwing so much food (if it could be called that) in the garbage. If they would do so when they got home, that was no longer my problem, I thought to myself.
Now, was I stealing? After all, I was dispensing with another’s (namely the owners’) goods in a contrary manner to what they were expecting of me, as if they were my own. And I justified it with good reasons (I’m pretty good at justifying my misdeeds). Let us see what they were and see if they were valid or not:
It was better the food go to people than to the garbage. Ok, this seems pretty noble, but the fact is that it wasn’t exactly food (as in it wasn’t nutritious) and also the people getting it weren’t needy (actually almost all of them were well-to-do). Food should go to those in need of it, right? Then why not to the needy? Because this stuff would never make it in edible condition to people really in need of food. So if they weren’t needy, why give it to them? So it wouldn’t end up in the garbage. Also, the owners’ have already counted this as a loss, so it really won’t affect them at all. Hm, circular logic here…
So, am I right to conclude that the ends don’t justify the means and that, all philanthropical flourish aside, I was simply stealing?
I worked for a time at a local branch of a donut franchise. At the end of the day we had to throw out ALL the donuts and bagels that were left over. This bothered me immensely, especially considering the quantities that were going into the garbage day after day. I got to think about all the wasted flour, eggs, sugar, etc that were not going to hungry people and ending up making snacks that eventually were not eaten. So, shortly thereafter, I began to give clients more than they would ask for (without making it perceptible to them while they were still in the store), just so that I would not be throwing so much food (if it could be called that) in the garbage. If they would do so when they got home, that was no longer my problem, I thought to myself.
Now, was I stealing? After all, I was dispensing with another’s (namely the owners’) goods in a contrary manner to what they were expecting of me, as if they were my own. And I justified it with good reasons (I’m pretty good at justifying my misdeeds). Let us see what they were and see if they were valid or not:
It was better the food go to people than to the garbage. Ok, this seems pretty noble, but the fact is that it wasn’t exactly food (as in it wasn’t nutritious) and also the people getting it weren’t needy (actually almost all of them were well-to-do). Food should go to those in need of it, right? Then why not to the needy? Because this stuff would never make it in edible condition to people really in need of food. So if they weren’t needy, why give it to them? So it wouldn’t end up in the garbage. Also, the owners’ have already counted this as a loss, so it really won’t affect them at all. Hm, circular logic here…
So, am I right to conclude that the ends don’t justify the means and that, all philanthropical flourish aside, I was simply stealing?