So what about that article then ? How do I did prove it ? Why did they say it ?
Thats the second or third time that re:quest site came up on the forums here in the last few days.
RE:Quest seems to be a modern, hip way of saying “Religious Education Quest”.
I did a whois search of their domain name to see if I could discern if the people who own the website are Catholic or not. The search comes back with:
Registrant: Counties Somerset
Trading as: RE:Quest Education
Registrant type: UK Individual
The registrants address is a PO Box in Taunton, Somerset.
It’s difficult to tell if they are Catholic or not. Some of the stuff is reasonably orthodox and they have pictures of a vested priest at the altar elevating a fractured host and similar images. They have educational materials about lent and other topics which Catholics would be comfortable with. There are also pictures of little cups of grape juice like at the congregational churches…
They also appear to run
theredirectory.org.uk/,
reonline.org.uk/ and
refuel.org.uk, and maybe others.
One of their teacher resource sites points to lots of information about all different religions. They don’t seem overtly anti-Catholic and it looks to me as if they are genuinely interested in religious education for all faiths.
What bothers me is that I can’t tell who runs it - the British government, a for profit corporation, a non-for profit institute like the Ford Foundation?

It is one of those benign looking websites and no one can find out who runs it.
To guess at your question, I don’t think they are denigrating catholicism, just making extremely general statements. It is difficult to distill 2000 years of Marian devotion and development of Marian doctrine in a sentance or two. Mary did become more important doctrine developed and the Holy Spirit led the Church, but that doesn’t mean that she wasn’t important to the early Church and that the doctrines are not true.
-Tim-