But…but…why on earth do you want to replace pretty melodic hymns with something simple and more-or-less monotonal?!!
On the one hand, traditionalist-leaning Catholics say that the Catholic faith has been “dumbed down” by the modernists who want only “happy-clappy” music. And yet, your answer to that is to provide “recto tono,” which is defined as “the simplest church music, just one tone?” That doesn’t make sense!
Why don’t you provide uplifting, inspiring, magnificent music? (I know the answer to that question–lack of money, and I sympathize with you.)
U
Do you really think that the “simplest music” is going to keep people in the Church and draw back the ones who have left? I don’t think so.
I’m pretty easy-going when it comes to church music, and I don’t mind chant that is badly sung, or contemporary music, or traditional hymns, or pretty much any kind of music that is done by Christians that I love and trust. However, I think a few months of “lecto tono” would drive me starko nutso. I like pretty music, or BEAUTIFUL, inspiring music, and I think a lot of others feel the same way, and I don’t apologize for that or consider it “un-Christian.” The Catholic Church has quite a lot to say about beauty and the arts, and I think that it’s appropriate for Christians to long for a “peek at heaven” in their Mass music.
If you want the antiphons, either hire a good cantor and ask them to find beautiful settings for the antiphons OR just say the antiphons and don’t sing them.
BTW, as a musician, I think that singing one tone is much harder than singing a lilting melody.