Islam in theory and practice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ontheway
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a hard time understanding how one can read the Hadith and not believe some of the things posted here.

Killing Jews is a must in order for the end times to be fulfilled.

Striking your wives is a must if they continue in disobedience.

And Muhammad said if anyone changes his Islamic Religion then kill him.

Also, stoning adulterers.
Did you ever read the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)? A lot of similar violence in there. However, here is where text interpretation in the context of culture, other verses, Hebrew language, and writing style is important. As a Protestant, you probably realize how important textual analysis is.
 
Did you ever read the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)? A lot of similar violence in there. However, here is where text interpretation in the context of culture, other verses, Hebrew language, and writing style is important. As a Protestant, you probably realize how important textual analysis is.
The difference is, none of the acts in the OT which were a direct violation of God’s will went unpunished; whereas in Islam, their “prophet” not only goes unpunished for his horrendous breach of natural law, he falsely claims it was God’s will. He essentially attempts to attribute a contradictory nature to God.
 
Did you ever read the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)? A lot of similar violence in there. However, here is where text interpretation in the context of culture, other verses, Hebrew language, and writing style is important. As a Protestant, you probably realize how important textual analysis is.
Of course the Bible has been analyzed and interpreted in countless ways over the centuries. We are accustomed to contextual analysis. This is not the case with the Koran, or hasn’t been until now.
Having listened to a number of muslims here and elsewhere and peeked at the Sunni discussion forum, I wonder to what extent the “context of culture” has actually changed since the 7th century, and if it would be a significant factor in interpreting the Koran for the modern Muslim scholar.
 
Did you ever read the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)? A lot of similar violence in there. However, here is where text interpretation in the context of culture, other verses, Hebrew language, and writing style is important. As a Protestant, you probably realize how important textual analysis is.
And also as a Protestant I’m commanded to love you, just as I believe Jesus most certainly loved you. He loves the Jews and was a Jew, but what about Islam my Jewish friend?

Quran 98:6 verily those who disbelieve in the Religion of Islam, the Qur’an and the Prophet Muhammad from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikun will abide in the fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

Remember, the Quran is a perfect holy book that predates humanity. It’s eternal, it has always existed and it calls you and I the worst of creatures. There is no historical context to this divine revelation by Allah.

The same goes for Surah 9:29. We are meant to be fought until we willingly submit and pay a tax. Again, no historical context, just a divine revelation from Allah that has existed as long as his throne.
 
Judging from my experience , there is no room for reinterpretation in the minds of the shaikhs (at least the majority of them) … that is why I quit islam and no longer believe in it. the community and the shaikhs are resisting any reinterpretation. Now they will tell you publicly : no , islam has room and all this nice phrases . but in reality a muslim can’t take the quran and interpret it individually since there is already a Tafsir (interpretation) literature . If that is the case , then why there is muslim immams ? years ago , a muslim group in America asked a woman to lead the friday prayer … that drove majority of muslims crazy since they are inventing (bid’a )in religion.

As for your question about egypt , you are totally right… Egyptian people were very secular. but that has nothing to do with classical Islam. in the 20th century , there was a crisis of faith in the Islamic world. And that’s where many marxist and leftist took power over there, because religion was so weak. egypt , Turkey , and Syria were very Sufi (mystics) , however the salalfi school (fundamentalist) reemerge in the late 70s and early 80s , and that’s why you see the hair covering thing grown since then . its not cultural , its only that people started to take their faith more seriously. I am not sure of I am right , but I believe all four schools of islam teach that hair covering is wajib for woman . the debate is , should she even cover her face ? in Saudi the immams says yes and they have their reasoning behind it .

islamqa.info/en/ref/21134 see this shaikh argument on niqab and hijab
I wonder how much of this is regional and cultural. I know some devout Muslim women from India and Indonesia who do not veil. Maybe because they live abroad and work in an academic setting? Are all the women in India, Indonesia and Pakistan veiled? Is their interpretation different, since they are farther removed from Saudi Arabia?
 
I wonder how much of this is regional and cultural. I know some devout Muslim women from India and Indonesia who do not veil. Maybe because they live abroad and work in an academic setting? Are all the women in India, Indonesia and Pakistan veiled? Is their interpretation different, since they are farther removed from Saudi Arabia?
well , judging from what I know, those places like india , Africa , and Indonesia were muslims for centuries … so they developed a local traditions that is not neccessrly following what the muhammad say and did . For example , in west africa , many muslims celebrate Christmas with christians. However , its changing all over the Islamic world. It’s like what happening in Latin America where most people are culturally catholic , but not necessarily follow the core teachings of the church. And like the Pentecostals who proselytized catholics, salafies are doing the same thing for suffis commuities. Therefore you see more and more radcle views coming from pakistan and india then it was 40 years ago .The only different is , I would argue, that sufism is not deep into what muhammad said and did , as salafies are. Thats why salafies (who are the worse kind of religious group) are growing much in number and the image of soft Islam is changing fast , thanks be to them.

now salafies come from the word “salaf” which means ancestors . They claim ti follow the early muslims (that is muhamamd) and their early successors . so they don’t care about later development inside islam. Sufies for example would ask saints to pray for them ! they venerate their tombs . this is absolutely “shirk” (the act of polytheism) according to salafi islam !
 
or how they view this situation.
:rotfl:

Here are some verses:

*(Quran 9:29):
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued”

**(Quran 47:4):
“Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.”

**(Quran 9:5):
“But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”

(Quran 5:33):
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment”.*
 
:rotfl:

Here are some verses:

(Quran 9:29):
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued”

(Quran 47:4):
“Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.”

(Quran 9:5):
“But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”

(Quran 5:33):
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment”.
And the following lines from the Hadith seem to confirm this:

Sahih Bukhari Book 52. Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)

Narated By Anas bin Malik : The Prophet said, “A single endeavor (of fighting) in Allah’s Cause in the forenoon or in the afternoon is better than the world and whatever is in it.”

So, is my pious Islamic friend simply delusional in believing that the Koran does not lead to violence and oppression or is there a way to a peaceful path for Islam?
 
I have a very devout Muslim friend who insists that the current Islamic practices; head scarves, violence; intolerance toward other religions, church burnings, interfaith killings; maiming and killing of girls who want to attend school, and so many other practices are a direct violation of the Koran and the Mohamedan idea.

What I would like to know is how many Muslims here agree with this idea; or how they view this situation.
Many times to rise Christian faith you assault İslam injusticely and cluelessly. Have you ever seen that a Muslim aspersion christianity. Muslim does not accept Trinity and some topics in Christianity but they explain cause of this and never assault. So do Muslims and İslam advocate violence or do others?

Prophet Muhammed teachs to not damage even an ant. Muslims and prophet fought to conserve their faith and religion, that is a fact. But this was by permission of God. İndeed there is no problem with this but Christians claim and pose this as if it is false. Because İslam is not a religion only as inner and spirituality. But İslam arrays and interests all part and section of society. Muslims built states and so they did what a state do normally. Like Spain, England, France i.e Muslim states did not make colonel and commercial factory. Muslim states did not behave cruelly. Muslims states never genocided.

A non-Muslim can not be forced to be Muslim without his acceptance accordin to Quran. But Muslims must profer and promote faith and İslam which is a kind of Jihad. Jihad is not fighting against non-Muslims but firstly fight against his own essence evil and struggle to get healing as morality. Then promote İslam to others. Once Jihad was made by fights but that does not mean Jihad is fighting. Many non-Muslims lived in İslam countries for centuries in peace.

Quran(Allah/God) order to women to cover oneself. There are a lot benefactions in this order. Because covering oneself is connate for a woman. That is to save womens from damages of evils. Because obscenity attract evil animus. İslam get abstain the ways that conclude in evil.

Before İslam women were so insignificiant but İslam gave women a very big value. Ordering women to cover herself do not worthless woman but make more valuable.

İf someone kils other in an unfair way then punishment of this guilt is Hell according to Quran. So a Muslim do not kill someone because that his religion order. On the contrary impose ban on such things.

İslam order to admire and respect to others religions.

Altough facts someone insist to show İslam that launch violence.
 
Many times to rise Christian faith you assault İslam injusticely and cluelessly. Have you ever seen that a Muslim aspersion christianity. Muslim does not accept Trinity and some topics in Christianity but they explain cause of this and never assault. So do Muslims and İslam advocate violence or do others?

Prophet Muhammed teachs to not damage even an ant. Muslims and prophet fought to conserve their faith and religion, that is a fact. But this was by permission of God. İndeed there is no problem with this but Christians claim and pose this as if it is false. Because İslam is not a religion only as inner and spirituality. But İslam arrays and interests all part and section of society. Muslims built states and so they did what a state do normally. Like Spain, England, France i.e Muslim states did not make colonel and commercial factory. Muslim states did not behave cruelly. Muslims states never genocided.

A non-Muslim can not be forced to be Muslim without his acceptance accordin to Quran. But Muslims must profer and promote faith and İslam which is a kind of Jihad. Jihad is not fighting against non-Muslims but firstly fight against his own essence evil and struggle to get healing as morality. Then promote İslam to others. Once Jihad was made by fights but that does not mean Jihad is fighting. Many non-Muslims lived in İslam countries for centuries in peace.

Quran(Allah/God) order to women to cover oneself. There are a lot benefactions in this order. Because covering oneself is connate for a woman. That is to save womens from damages of evils. Because obscenity attract evil animus. İslam get abstain the ways that conclude in evil.

Before İslam women were so insignificiant but İslam gave women a very big value. Ordering women to cover herself do not worthless woman but make more valuable.

İf someone kils other in an unfair way then punishment of this guilt is Hell according to Quran. So a Muslim do not kill someone because that his religion order. On the contrary impose ban on such things.

İslam order to admire and respect to others religions.

Altough facts someone insist to show İslam that launch violence.
But, you did not read my post. I am not accusing anyone of anything. I do have a real Muslim friend who always says that acts of terrorism by various groups who shout “Allahu Akbar” when they kill children are not part of Islam.

My question is where do these people get the idea that they are serving their god by killing innocent people.

I had hoped that someone like you would be able to help me understand better how this works.

By the way. Just today I picked up a book by a young lady named Asma Gull Hasan. The book seems to agree with my friend’s idea (and maybe yours) that the Koran does not order to kill and enslave.

So, help me out.

About Muslims tolerating other religions, go on a Sunni discussion lists and read how they talk about dominating the Christians and they do say very unkind words about my religion. Check for yourself.
 
Many times to rise Christian faith you assault İslam injusticely and cluelessly.
İf someone kils other in an unfair way then punishment of this guilt is Hell according to Quran. So a Muslim do not kill someone because that his religion order. On the contrary impose ban on such things.

İslam order to admire and respect to others religions.

Altough facts someone insist to show İslam that launch violence.
Here is a clue. Another “Allahu Akbar” killing. This time in London. They cut off a man’s head as he was walking by.
Please explain this. To yourself.
 
Here is a clue. Another “Allahu Akbar” killing. This time in London. They cut off a man’s head as he was walking by.
Please explain this. To yourself.
They ran him over with a car first, got out of said car and then starting hacking him up.

When the cops got there, they headed towards the officers, cops fired shots & took them down.

They’re still alive & in the hospital.

If you watch the recorded video, he said … “by allah, we will not stop”… then he starting ranting while still holding on to the bloody cleaver and a small machete.

What blows my mind is that they are in the UK, hate the UK, hate the people & the government but they won’t do anything to get out of there and go to an Islamic state.
 
But, you did not read my post. I am not accusing anyone of anything. I do have a real Muslim friend who always says that acts of terrorism by various groups who shout “Allahu Akbar” when they kill children are not part of Islam.

My question is where do these people get the idea that they are serving their god by killing innocent people.

I had hoped that someone like you would be able to help me understand better how this works.

By the way. Just today I picked up a book by a young lady named Asma Gull Hasan. The book seems to agree with my friend’s idea (and maybe yours) that the Koran does not order to kill and enslave.

So, help me out.

About Muslims tolerating other religions, go on a Sunni discussion lists and read how they talk about dominating the Christians and they do say very unkind words about my religion. Check for yourself.
I wanted to attract attention that there is no such violence idea in İslam. But there are individual samples which indeed has no link to İslam. Non of normal İslamic group or state practise violence. So we may analyse this as sociological.

My consept: İslamic states are poor in general. Some Muslims suffer curelty by western powers and USA. So they got hate against such torment. They are so weak as economical but they have an invincible power and fulcrum and it is İslam. Muslims make some mistakes and that is considered as if they do this for their religion. İndeed they use religion in a wrong way. They do not benefit İslam but they damage İslam.

İf Muslims were so powerful and have a good health religious knowledge and right belief than they do such things, you can claim that İslam promote violence. But people are so lack in religion and in fact they do not understant their religion( There are many reasons) so they make such mistakes.

Non normal Muslim do not say unkind words about oathers as ı know. That is true Muslims believe that Christian are in an obvious mistake about Trinity, Confession i.e but that is because conflict with İslamic scholar which we know is right decided and doubthless direct from Quran(Allah).
 
I wanted to attract attention that there is no such violence idea in İslam.

But, there are a lot of statements in the Koran calling for violence. Your statement is not true.

But there are individual samples which indeed has no link to İslam.

Then why do all the killers shout Allahu Akbar? It is hard to believe what you say.

My consept: İslamic states are poor in general.

Saudi Arabia? The Emirates?

Some Muslims suffer curelty by western powers and USA. So they got hate against such torment.

The London killer from yesterday was born in London. Who was cruel to him?

They are so weak as economical but they have an invincible power and fulcrum and it is İslam. Muslims make some mistakes and that is considered as if they do this for their religion. İndeed they use religion in a wrong way. They do not benefit İslam but they damage İslam.

But, you say that their source of power is Islam. They are true believers. They get their mistaken religion from somewhere. Do they get it at the mosque?

İf Muslims were so powerful and have a good health religious knowledge and right belief than they do such things, you can claim that İslam promote violence. But people are so lack in religion and in fact they do not understant their religion( There are many reasons) so they make such mistakes.

So people like yourself should teach them. What is the Islamic religious establishment doing to stop these acts of violence? Why is no one in the Islamic community condemning these acts? Where are the imams? Very silent. Where are the public statements?

Non normal Muslim do not say unkind words about oathers as ı know. That is true Muslims believe that Christian are in an obvious mistake about Trinity, Confession i.e but that is because conflict with İslamic scholar which we know is right decided and doubthless direct from Quran(Allah).
Finally, the Koran says that the Bible is the word of God and that the Bible is wrong. How can God be wrong? Why would God try to confuse all the Christians in the world by tricking us into believing that Jesus was crucified? The Koran says that Jesus did not die on the cross. Is God playing a little joke? Is he fooling us? Or, is the Koran wrong?

We Christians have to decide who is right: God or the Koran. WE CHOOSE GOD.
 
The difference is, none of the acts in the OT which were a direct violation of God’s will went unpunished; whereas in Islam, their “prophet” not only goes unpunished for his horrendous breach of natural law, he falsely claims it was God’s will. He essentially attempts to attribute a contradictory nature to God.
I’m alluding to the acts of G-d Himself or His instructions to the leaders of His people, which, if not interpreted carefully, would seem to suggest that the G-d of the Jews and the universe is hardly a beneficent Being.
 
Then why do all the killers shout Allahu Akbar? It is hard to believe what you say.
You do realise a lot of muslims leaders have denounced the killing in Woolwich…
Who represents Islam more, LEADERS or supposed FOLLOWERS, who have little knowledge about what the Quran says about what they preach and do.
youtube.com/watch?v=lybfQabOMPw&fmt=18
Just one of many videos.
 
OK, but there is another opinion. My friend grew up in Egypt where women did not wear the hijab back in the 60’s and the 70’s. Only the old women did. Now it is universal. Women who grew up not wearing the hijab do so now and force their daughters to wear them. I can’t think of an explanation for this. Maybe someone with more experience can help?
Its partly psychological jihad and keeps Islam perpetually visible and ‘relevant’.
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top