Islam: Sex slave?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonathan_Cid
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
**We are not worried about the gospels agreeing with Quran or not. At least you have admitted that there were many false gospels. So they were rejected and only four gospels were admitted. Why?

You claim some gospels to be false. That is bad enough for you. I do not need to give any proof now. You are disturbed by some other gospels.**
they disturb us in no way…they are not accepted because they are not apostolic even though some are orthodox in teachings…you can pick any book of these apocrypha and it will still show you Muhammad as a false prophet…so *you *must stop refering to these books if you don;t want yet other books proving Muhammad a false prophet…remember, Allah left you nothing to prove Muhammad’s prophethood, not OT, nor NT, nor Tradition, nor history, not even apocrypha 😉
 
**We are not worried about the gospels agreeing with Quran or not. At least you have admitted that there were many false gospels. So they were rejected and only four gospels were admitted. Why?

You claim some gospels to be false. That is bad enough for you. I do not need to give any proof now. You are disturbed by some other gospels.**
We never conceal the truth from people unlike you Muslims, who deny the historic fact that Othman revised the Koran and burned its false copies.

I know that there were false Gospels and that the Church of God condemned the false ones through the guidance of God’s Spirit. Do not worry about the apostles and Jesus’ disciples. They were able to distinguish false teachings from Jesus’ true message, for our God always made the truth prevail.

Your Koran teaches that Satan and Allah revealed verses at the same time, and Allah deleted Satanic verses and made editions to His word later. Study your religion first, dear planten.
 
We are not worried about the gospels agreeing with Quran or not. At least you have admitted that there were many false gospels. So they were rejected and only four gospels were admitted. Why?
Uh, because the others were FALSE!😛
You claim some gospels to be false. That is bad enough for you. I do not need to give any proof now. You are disturbed by some other gospels.
Not disturbed at all. Are you disturbed about the gospel that Muhammad claimed an angel of light brought to him?
 
We never conceal the truth from people unlike you Muslims, who deny the historic fact that Othman revised the Koran and burned its false copies.

I know that there were false Gospels and that the Church of God condemned the false ones through the guidance of God’s Spirit. Do not worry about the apostles and Jesus’ disciples. They were able to distinguish false teachings from Jesus’ true message, for our God always made the truth prevail.

Your Koran teaches that Satan and Allah revealed verses at the same time, and Allah deleted Satanic verses and made editions to His word later. Study your religion first, dear planten.
I thank God that you have come around to admitting your faults about the rejection of many gospels. Previously you were demanding a proof from me. Thanks to you too.
 
I thank God that you have come around to admitting your faults about the rejection of many gospels. Previously you were demanding a proof from me. Thanks to you too.
You must be losing your ability to understand English, which is very saddening. 😦
 
The “gospels” that we rejected were not accepted because they were written WAY after the original Gospels and present many doubtful “facts”.
 
The “gospels” that we rejected were not accepted because they were written WAY after the original Gospels and present many doubtful “facts”.
yet they still prove Muhammad a false prophet 😉 Muslims think that these gospels will be like the Quran…Planten will hate it if he reads “Jesus our God” in some of these gospels …🙂
 
The “gospels” that we rejected were not accepted because they were written WAY after the original Gospels and present many doubtful “facts”.
Sorry, Barnabas was a disciple or an original man. Where is his gospel? You love and I support love too. I believe “Love for all, Hatred for none.” Welcome.
 
Sorry, Barnabas was a disciple or an original man. Where is his gospel? You love and I support love too. I believe “Love for all, Hatred for none.” Welcome.
The Gospel that you claim was written by Barnabas was proven a forgery and was written around 400 AD. There is no way he could have written that. He lived around 60 AD.
 
The Gospel that you claim was written by Barnabas was proven a forgery and was written around 400 AD. There is no way he could have written that. He lived around 60 AD.
My mistake the Acts of Barnabas was written around 400 AD.

the Gospel of Barnabas was much later in fact the Two known manuscripts have been dated to the late sixteenth century.

Fortunately we have manuscripts of the 4 Gospels that date back to the late 1st century and early 2nd and 3rd centuries.
 
Sorry, Barnabas was a disciple or an original man. Where is his gospel? You love and I support love too. I believe “Love for all, Hatred for none.” Welcome.
What makes you think that Barnabas wrote a Gospel or that the Gospel attributed to him is truly his writing? You Muslims deny the authenticity of the canonical Gospels primarily because they are ascribed by the Church to human writers (Jesus’ apostles/disciples). You also claim that none of the canonical Gospels can be original because the Koran says the Gospel (Injeel) was the name of a book dictated/revealed to Jesus. However, you suddenly forget these tenets and objections when the Gospel of Barnabas is in question. I do not like the Islamic notion of justice, which is essentially based on double-standard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top