S
Sirach14
Guest
Robert Spencer, author of book, talks about Islam the way Islam is. He pulls no punches.
washtimes.com/culture/20050823-105218-4831r.htm
washtimes.com/culture/20050823-105218-4831r.htm
Not a good example. Hiroshima was not nuked in the name of Christianity. Many people try to make the arguement that Christians are just as violent by mentioning the IRA or McViegh. The IRA did not bomb in the name of Catholicism, and McViegh was not particularly religious.It amuses me no end that those who insist that Islam is a violent religion that justifies terrorism are often the same people that say Christianity is a religion of peace that justifies nuking Hiroshima and/or pre-emptively invading Iraq.
It means both peace and submission. A Muslim being one who submits to God.Not a good example. Hiroshima was not nuked in the name of Christianity. Many people try to make the arguement that Christians are just as violent by mentioning the IRA or McViegh. The IRA did not bomb in the name of Catholicism, and McViegh was not particularly religious.
I think Islam means “submission”. Correct me if I’m wrong.
I see your point of view. However, I feel their is a difference between a Christians oppinion on how to conduct a war, and a Muslim who believes that he will go to “72 Virgins” by blowing up some infidels.It means both peace and submission. A Muslim being one who submits to God.
I did not say that Hiroshima was bombed in the name of Christianity. I said that some people who say Islam is inherently violent also say that the use of weapons of mass destruction against Japanese civillians can be justified by Christian doctrine. Neither Islam nor Christianity are religions of aggression although many Muslims and Christians seek to distort their faith to justify their own evil deeds.
Wow, lets see Cristianity, means something like another Christ, but yet it is taught that we all have our fallen nature, we will never be as blameless as Christ. I guess when we get to heaven purified will be as pure and blameless as Christ.The word Islam shares the same root as the word Salaam meaning “Peace”, see islam.about.com/blintroa.htm hence those who say Islam is a religion of peace have a good case.
It amuses me no end that those who insist that Islam is a violent religion that justifies terrorism are often the same people that say Christianity is a religion of peace that justifies nuking Hiroshima and/or pre-emptively invading Iraq.
Not many Muslims think that suicide bombing is morally acceptable either.I see your point of view. However, I feel their is a difference between a Christians oppinion on how to conduct a war, and a Muslim who believes that he will go to “72 Virgins” by blowing up some infidels.
Many good Catholics of concience (spelling) can disagree on the war in Iraq, or whether or not the nuking of Hiroshima was morally just. However, nobody can argue that strapping a bomb to you and bombing a cafe is morally acceptable.
Who started the practice of suicide bombing is irrelevent. I do not think anybody has clamed it was exclusive the Islamic terrorist.Not many Muslims think that suicide bombing is morally acceptable either.
Incidentally suicide bombing in the modern era was pioneered by the mostly Hindu Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka, not to mention the mostly Shintoist Kamikaze pilots of Japan. Poor Christian America besieged by all these murderous world religions whose believers are overwhelmingly committed to destroying themselves because they hate freedom so much.
Darn right the media isn’t reporting it. Muslims practically fall over each other in condemning terrorism but the Corporate Media doesn’t report it much. Nonetheless you can find it if you have the goodwill to look for it. It is more comforting though to think of all billion or so Muslims as enemies of freedom who love to kill Americans and Jews. That way the USA is always right isn’t it?Who in the Islamic community condemns the acts of terror perpetuated by the terrorist? What we have are leaders in the Islamic community calling for these attacks. I should not have to search a web site looking for a condemnation of terrorism. They should be more public.(Maybe the media isn’t reporting it).
Muslims Condemn Terrorist Attacks
This page focuses on condemnations of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It is not a complete listing of all condemnations written or spoken by Muslims but is intended to provide a representative sample. Note: See also How American Muslims Really Responded to September 11 for more information about the Muslim response to 9/11. And another listing is at Statements Against Terror. Related commentary at Friedman Wrong About Muslims Again , by Juan Cole.
Muslim Leaders
Code:[American Muslim Leaders Condemn Attacks](http://islamicity.com/articles/Articles.asp?ref=AM0109-335)
cair-net.org/html/911statements.html
**CAIR condemnation of suicide bombing
** (WASHINGTON, D.C., 3/28/2002) - The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Washington-based Islamic advocacy group, today condemned a bomb attack on a Passover celebration in the Middle East that left 20 people dead and more than 100 wounded.
In a statement, CAIR said:
"We condemn this attack and all other attacks on innocent civilians. Illegitimate and counterproductive tactics must not be used in the legitimate struggle to end Israel’s brutal occupation.
"This attack is of particular concern coming as it did during a religious observance in which the focus is remembrance of God.
Hiroshima and Iraq have nothing to do with Christianity. There was never a claim that they did. The terrorist at least claim what they are doing is in the name of Islam. Just because the words have the same root does not give them a right to claim they are a religion of peace. Actions speak louder than words.The word Islam shares the same root as the word Salaam meaning “Peace”, see islam.about.com/blintroa.htm hence those who say Islam is a religion of peace have a good case.
It amuses me no end that those who insist that Islam is a violent religion that justifies terrorism are often the same people that say Christianity is a religion of peace that justifies nuking Hiroshima and/or pre-emptively invading Iraq.
No they were not Christian. They were what they have always been, American. I know this is a strange concept to you but we do not have a state religion. Our military is Christian, Jew, Muslim, Atheist, anamist maybe even some Hindu and Bhuddist.Well if teh actions speak louder than words then what about 3 million vietnameese killed for a useless war of agression!!!
Doesnt all the christian american soldiers have any morals to preepmt this war ? or wasnt they christian back then ?
meedo said:~~~~~~!!!
Sorry but i dont like throwing briks whilke your whole CITY is made of glass!!!
Peace