Isn't eternity in hell a disproportionate punishment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAdvocate
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
(ILet me spell it out to all of you who are ripping me apart for saying I skipped mass maybe 2 or 3 times in my life:

In my post, I was not, repeat, was NOT, trying to say that skipping mass was ok, or that I do it on a regular basis. All I was doing was giving my stupid, wrong, inexcusable reasons for skipping mass, in attempt to make a point

Still wrong? Yes. Still horrible? Yes. Still inexcusable? YES. Did I do it specifically with the intention to hurt/rebel against God? No. Did I do it because I am an imperfect human being who, in times of weakness, sometimes makes bad decisions? Yes!
OK, I am confused by a couple of things here.

You claim missing Mass to not be a mortal sin in earlier posts…
Yes I did. I definitely don’t think missing one mass is enough to make someone go to Hell. That is my opinion. I never said what I did wasn’t wrong, but do I think it’s worthy of Hell? No. Do I think it’s less grave than killing someone? Yes.
And yet we also have your quotes above.
Where you admit it was wrong…
Still wrong? Yes.
Where you admit it is serious…
Still horrible? Yes. Still inexcusable? YES
And apparently you did it freely.
Isn’t that the very definition of a mortal sin?
 
The OP was asking how anything could warrant an eternity of pain. The posts in reply state that any sin, no matter what it is, equates to a wholesale rejection of God and therefore warrants hell. Basically that’s it right. I can’t understand how a good God could make loving him or punishment the only options. And where are the goal posts exactly ; one reply even suggests playing games (and probably any recreation at all) instead of studying scripture amounts to a rejection, others say such things in moderation are okay. Who ya gonna believe?:rolleyes:
One can trust the catechism. One can not (usually) trust one’s own ‘feelings’. Too many are either inclined to scrupulosity or to relativity.

The goals are not that difficult really. Do you see the catechism saying, “Catholics can’t play games?” No. Do you see, "Catholics can do nothing but play games and don’t have to study scripture at all? No. ERGO: Catholics should study scripture but need not do so to the exclusion of other leisure activities (provided they are ‘moral’ activities. IOW, sitting down for a drink with a friend while eating a nice meal and having a discussion is fine. Sitting down for 10 drinks in a bar while eying the people for sexual encounters. . .NOT fine.

When did ‘common sense’ become so uncommon? Why are people straining at gnats and swallowing elephants?

I know, anybody can come on here and pretend to be Suzy Special Catholic with enough knowledge to be a doctor of the Church. Well, you know, check Suzy out. If Suzy has maybe 50 posts, most of which are “the Church is wrong on this”, I wouldn’t trust Suzy just yet. But if Suzy has 10,000 posts on a great number of threads, is well-regarded by her peers, has no ‘sanctions’ against her, expresses herself without use of profanity, has been known to sometimes make an error and as soon as she is made aware, responds with apologies and thanks to the ones who pointed it out, seems patient and caring. . .well, then Suzy might be somebody whom one can trust to some degree. I mean, don’t you ‘vet’ most 'experts? You just don’t accept people to be ‘experts’ because they say so, right?

IOW, take some time to act (research, think, pray) and not just knee jerk ‘react’ to people.
 
OK, I am confused by a couple of things here.

You claim missing Mass to not be a mortal sin in earlier posts…

And yet we also have your quotes above.
Where you admit it was wrong…

Where you admit it is serious…

And apparently you did it freely.
Isn’t that the very definition of a mortal sin?
That something is wrong and you do it freely? No. Or at least not that I believe. If that were the case than ANYTHING we did wrong while knowing it was wrong would be a mortal sin. Like swearing, or not doing the dishes right away, or telling someone a little white lie, or getting impatient with another person. There are tons of little petty things we do on a daily basis, that we know are wrong but do them anyway. We all sin daily.

I said “do I think missing one mass is wrong? yes. Do I think it is deserving of eternal damnation? no.” What is so confusing to you about that? I don’t know how I could have made myself any more clear.

Just because I think something is wrong doesn’t mean I think a person will gain eternal damnation for it. We all do little wrong things every day. It needs to be something really grave for it to be a mortal sin. I don’t think skipping one mass is grave enough for anyone to deserve Hell. Unless of course, they did it to purposely/intentionally reject God, but that certainly wasn’t the case with me, and I highly doubt it’s the case for most people when they skip one day.

You don’t have to agree, and maybe I am wrong. But I was just giving my opinion, and my opinion doesn’t change.
 
Debora you are correct in what you say. Missing Mass is not a hell bent sin. I have been on this website for almost a year now and I notice something about how Catholics see sin as. I am a Greek Orthodox Christian and in my Church we view sin differently than the Catholics. It is because our Saints or more specifically the Church Fathers of the East had a lighter view to sin then the Latin Fathers. The Latin Fathers had seen the sin of Adam and Eve as very severe whereas the Eastern Fathers see the sin of Adam and Eve as light. Yet the Eastern Fathers said the consequences to their sin was heavy. Now by heavy they the Eastern Fathers mean that death came to the world. But the Eastern Fathers will not go into the direction of the Latin Fathers and say the sin caused a terrible seperation from God like for instance a state of hell. The Eastern Fathers will say the sin caused bodily death not spiritual death. St.John writes in his epistle that there is a sin that can bring about spiritual death. This is what we call mortal sin. Now let me explain how grevious mortal sin can be. When the Nazis were exterminating the Jewish people alot of these Nazis were German Catholics and what some will do is to participate in the Sunday Mass and receive Communion. Now this is what we call Mortal sins. St.Paul condemn such actions as sins against the Body of Christ and these are grevious in their nature. St.Paul was writing to the Corinthians and warning them about this type of sin because some of them were dying. You see when the Mass was celebrated in Corinth they will have pot luck dinner and the rich avoided the poor and only the rich ate. This was a grevious sin in the eyes of God and some of them I mean the rich were dying. St.Paul wrote the letter to warn them against such conduct they have with the poor. Now missing Mass is not that big of a deal. There may by good reason to miss it. It does not count as Mortal as some as said so. Now if you miss Mass because you killed your next door neighbour well that is different. May by it is a good thing to miss Mass if you had killed your neighbour because you will not be like the Nazis who killed every week thousands of the Jewish Faith and then participated in the Sunday Mass. It will have been better had these Nazis not gone to Church at all! Now God is not going to be disturb about missing Mass once in awhile. And I do not think we are to burden our brothers and sisters who have done so and make them feel guilty over something that is not. So Debora you are right about what you say. We are weak and God understands that. We go to Mass because we are weak. God understands our condition so well. If you want to get after people then get after the ones who receive our Lord but come out argueing with their neighbour. Now I have a problem with that. How can 2 people after receiving our Lord can start after each other coming out of Mass. Man, won’t that bug Jesus. Listen if you are a good natured person fullfilling all the requirements that the Lord asks of you and you are attending plenty of Masses and Confessions, He is going to remember you. He is not going to be bothered if you miss at times. He is going to remember your visits. He will not be disturbed when you do not visit Him. Unless of course you will be doing it for a very long time. I wish the Catholic Church or more specifically Catholics will enter the world of the Eastern Church and just read about our Saints and our Church Fathers and Mothers and get a glimpse of what God is doing there. We have an ernormous amount of wealth and wisdom and spirituality that can help any Christian. Two Saints of the East that I can recommend for any Catholic to look up is St.John Chysostom ( my mentor ) and St.Seraphim of Russia. We have thousands of Saints at your disposal. Even though I am Greek Orthodox I have studied Catholic spirituality and I have adopted a Catholic way into my life. I especially am drawn to 3 Catholic Saints. St.Anthony of Padua, St.Maria Faustina and St.Francis of Assisi. Another one I have close relation to is St.Clare. I have also adopted His Holiness John Paul II as a mentor and have drawn up alot of my own experiences based on the life of this Holy and Saintly man.
Thanks Dave. I think going to mass weekly is very important, and while I think skipping a day of mass is wrong, I wouldn’t consider it (in isolation) worthy of Hell.

It’s cool that you’re a Greek Orthodox but take interest in Catholicism. I didn’t know your religion had saints. That’s pretty interesting! BTW, JPII is a big hero of mine as well. He was a great man…
 
40.png
Debora123:
Debora

The point of this is, missing ONE mass on purpose, on Sunday, is a mortal sin. ONE mortal sin produces the following

***1035 *The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, “eternal fire.” The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.

None of us knows the time we will die. therefore, if a mortal sin is committed, don’t make things worse by trying to reduce it down to a misdemeanor or no fault at all. That’s Satan trying to keep people in mortal sin. And he does a great job at it.

16 If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God * will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal… [1 Jn 5:16…] There’s one sure way of ridding the soul of Mortal sin. Sacramental confession

We need to protect our souls vigillantly. And Jesus gave His Catholic Church all the remedies to keep our souls safe

Here again is the scripture telling why missing mass on purpose, is so serious for the individual’s soul.

Heb 10:
23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful; 24 and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, 25 not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near. 26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27* but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries. 28* A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29* How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

Paraphrased
  • do NOT miss mass purposely on Sunday, as is the habit of some
  • notice, it’s already considered a mortal sin to miss mass. Why?
  • because the person who misses mass on purpose, ignores the sacrifice for sin] & by doing so, they profane the [blood of the covenant[/COLOR]]. Both references to the Eucharist. Mt 26:28 28 for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
  • the consequences to that soul for this? A *prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries of God. Does that sound like a misdemeanor? Nope!!! *That consequence mentioned can only describe the result of a mortal sin.
ONE mortal sin is all it takes to end up in hell. Don’t give parking space in your head for anyone who says otherwise.
 
Debora, I feel you have somehow wound up with a kind of ‘disconnect’.

You have stated that missing Mass is a grave sin.

You have also stated that “in isolation” it ISN’T a mortal sin. You have also stated that it isn’t to be compared with ‘mass murder’.

I’m not trying to be the big bad killjoy here, but Debora, the whole point to a mortal sin (and you know that the three conditions which define it must be met or it isn’t mortal) is that being mortal, it is utterly offensive to God. It absolutely KILLS our relationship with God.

Now, suppose you wanted to commit suicide. You arranged it so that you simultaneously (obviously with the help of ‘friends’) drank deadly poison, injected yourself with poison, were shot in the head and the heart, hung by the neck, and guillotined.

Any one of those methods was fatal. You killed yourself using 6 separate ‘fatal’ blows. Are you six times as dead as if you’d only used ONE of the methods?

Which is ‘worse?’ Was it worse that you drank poison or were hung? Shot or guillotined? Or were they equal in their result and the only way in which you might have FELT one ‘worse’ than another was your own SUBJECTIVE EMOTIONS, which could DIFFER FROM ANOTHER PERSON’S???

**Ah, you’ll say. But missing Mass is nothing like as ‘bad’ as murder. **
WRONG. NOT in its APPEARANCE but YES IN ITS RESULTS.

**Both deliberate missing of Mass and murder are EQUALLY OFFENSIVE IN THEIR RESULT TO GOD (who after all is the one who matters here). **

You aren’t going to be ‘less dead’ to God if you ONLY deliberately missed Mass. You aren’t going to be MORE dead to God if you killed a person.

Equal in RESULT and CONSEQUENCE by virtue of the effect upon both your soul and your relation with God.


**So stop playing the “how can it possibly MATTER to God if I eat meat (deliberately) on a Lenten Friday or miss a Mass deliberately?” It matters because God (who knows a lot more than you and I do) has said it does. For us to start saying, “Oh God CAN’T be serious” is a very nasty little step toward the "Oh, you surely won’t DIE if you eat the fruit from the tree of life, silly Adam and Eve, you’ll just BE LIKE GOD’ camp. You don’t want to go there. Really, you don’t. **
 
**So stop playing the “how can it possibly MATTER to God if I eat meat (deliberately) on a Lenten Friday or miss a Mass deliberately?” It matters because God (who knows a lot more than you and I do) has said it does. For us to start saying, “Oh God CAN’T be serious” is a very nasty little step toward the "Oh, you surely won’t DIE if you eat the fruit from the tree of life, silly Adam and Eve, you’ll just BE LIKE GOD’ camp. You don’t want to go there. Really, you don’t. **
Ok, I never said it doesn’t matter to God when I sin. Please don’t put words in my mouth. I just simply don’t think skipping one mass will send someone to Hell. I think they may go to Hell for other sins in conjunction to skipping one mass, or maybe for their whole attitude towards God in general, but I think if someone gets lazy one day and doesn’t go to mass once, while still very wrong, it won’t, in isolation, send that person to Hell. And I still think murder is worse. Just my opinion.
 
I don’t know, I just don’t think mortal sin (well, sin in general) is really that black and white. I think it’s the person’s “intent” that can be more damaging to their relationship with God, not just the act in isolation. I think killing someone is worse than skipping mass because of the intent and the outcome involved. It takes a much more evil person to take away the life of another. Killing someone takes away the life of another one of God’s beloved human beings, and brings about great grief and sadness to the victim’s families. And the murderer knows that and does it anyway. That’s a much more evil thing than skipping one mass because you were lazy that day.

Take for example, stealing. That’s a mortal sin, right?

I say, it isn’t necessarily always a mortal sin. Because like I said, I think for certain things to be a mortal sin, a certain intent is necessary. You can steal a quarter out of your mother’s wallet, or you can steal a quarter from someone who you know is a really poor person. (In fact, didn’t Jesus use a similar example in the bible? Although I don’t really like referring to the bible anyway, because you can interpret something pretty much any way you’d like.) You may know that your mom has so much money she won’t even notice that she’s one quarter short, so there isn’t as evil of an intent involved. But if you steal that same amount of $ from a poor person, you know that the person will be that much closer to not affording lunch and starving to death. And knowing this, you do it anyway. That’s a lot more evil than the first scenario.

I know that this example doesn’t and can’t apply to everything, but I was just using it to make a point about the gravity of sins. Certain things can be a sin no matter how you look at them, but when it comes to Hell, I think it depends more on what’s in that person’s heart and what their intentions are. And only God can know that. But It’s a lot more likely that a person will have an evil intent when they are killing another person, vs skipping one mass.
 
That something is wrong and you do it freely? No. Or at least not that I believe.
You are correct, knowing something is wrong, and freely choosing it is not quite a mortal sin.
You also must know the sin to be serious.
I believe you did know this. From your own words we have the admission of the seriousness of the sin:
Still horrible? Yes. Still inexcusable? YES
That would complete the 3 requirements for a mortal sin.
It is a good thing that you repented of the sin.
I said “do I think missing one mass is wrong? yes. Do I think it is deserving of eternal damnation? no.” What is so confusing to you about that? I don’t know how I could have made myself any more clear.
You made your position clear, and negated any possibility of it having any validity whatsoever at the same time.
You don’t have to agree, and maybe I am wrong. But I was just giving my opinion, and my opinion doesn’t change.
Perhaps you overlooked the previous post where I outlined the 3 conditions for a mortal sin and also outlined how your own words showed that missing Mass fit the criteria.
I believe your opinion is based on incomplete information.
 
You are correct, knowing something is wrong, and freely choosing it is not quite a mortal sin.
You also must know the sin to be serious.
I believe you did know this. From your own words we have the admission of the seriousness of the sin:

That would complete the 3 requirements for a mortal sin.
It is a good thing that you repented of the sin.

You made your position clear, and negated any possibility of it having any validity whatsoever at the same time.

Perhaps you overlooked the previous post where I outlined the 3 conditions for a mortal sin and also outlined how your own words showed that missing Mass fit the criteria.
I believe your opinion is based on incomplete information.
Well I disagree. I think a person’s intention is deeper than merely knowing whether or not something is wrong, and I think there’s more to it than just that. The stealing scenario I put up was a good example. I can skip mass because I was caught in a moment of weakness and gave in to temptation while I was feeling lazy, or I can skip mass because I’ve made a conscious decision that I no longer want God in my life. I think the second one is worthy of Hell, and the first is worthy of purgatory. Again, that is my opinion. That is why these things are up to God to judge. Nonetheless, I don’t think anyone can say for sure that anyone else is going to Hell for having done something that is considered to be a mortal sin, because it isn’t black and white, and only God knows what their full intentions were.
 
That would complete the 3 requirements for a mortal sin.
Yes, but those can also apply to any sin that is not mortal. Just because those 3 requirements were present, doesn’t mean the sin was mortal. Those requirements are present for most venial sins we all commit on a daily basis.
 
I don’t know, I just don’t think mortal sin (well, sin in general) is really that black and white. I think it’s the person’s “intent” that can be more damaging to their relationship with God, not just the act in isolation.
Whether I swing an axe wrong and chop my fit off by accident or I deliberately cut it off; my foot is still off.
Any sinful act of serious matter that is partaken of freely will sever the relationship with God.
I think killing someone is worse than skipping mass because of the intent and the outcome involved.
Don’t look at it as a comparison between the two acts you outlined, think of it as a direct ‘NO’ to God.
Whether you say ‘no’ the way Judas did or say ‘no’ the way Peter did, you still have said ‘no’.
It takes a much more evil person to take away the life of another. Killing someone takes away the life of another one of God’s beloved human beings, and brings about great grief and sadness to the victim’s families. And the murderer knows that and does it anyway. That’s a much more evil thing than skipping one mass because you were lazy that day.
Right. But the effect on the relationship to God is still the same.
Take for example, stealing. That’s a mortal sin, right?
As with any sin we would consider mortal, that would all depend upon the circumstances.
I say, it isn’t necessarily always a mortal sin. Because like I said, I think for certain things to be a mortal sin, a certain intent is necessary. You can steal a quarter out of your mother’s wallet, or you can steal a quarter from someone who you know is a really poor person. (In fact, didn’t Jesus use a similar example in the bible? Although I don’t really like referring to the bible anyway, because you can interpret something pretty much any way you’d like.) You may know that your mom has so much money she won’t even notice that she’s one quarter short, so there isn’t as evil of an intent involved. But if you steal that same amount of $ from a poor person, you know that the person will be that much closer to not affording lunch and starving to death. And knowing this, you do it anyway. That’s a lot more evil than the first scenario.

I know that this example doesn’t and can’t apply to everything, but I was just using it to make a point about the gravity of sins. Certain things can be a sin no matter how you look at them, but when it comes to Hell, I think it depends more on what’s in that person’s heart and what their intentions are. And only God can know that. But It’s a lot more likely that a person will have an evil intent when they are killing another person, vs skipping one mass.
You seem to want to steer this into culpability.
That is fine. But you should keep in mind that missing the Mass is mortal, but there can be reduced culpability.
 
Yes, but those can also apply to any sin that is not mortal. Just because those 3 requirements were present, doesn’t mean the sin was mortal. Those requirements are present for most venial sins we all commit on a daily basis.
You may need to go back and read the CCC.
Mortal sin is quite clearly spelled out.
1854 Sins are rightly evaluated according to their gravity. The distinction between mortal and venial sin, already evident in Scripture,129 became part of the tradition of the Church. It is corroborated by human experience.
1855 Mortal sin destroys charity in the heart of man by a grave violation of God’s law; it turns man away from God, who is his ultimate end and his beatitude, by preferring an inferior good to him.
Venial sin allows charity to subsist, even though it offends and wounds it.
1856 Mortal sin, by attacking the vital principle within us - that is, charity - necessitates a new initiative of God’s mercy and a conversion of heart which is normally accomplished within the setting of the sacrament of reconciliation:
**When the will sets itself upon something that is of its nature incompatible with the charity that orients man toward his ultimate end, then the sin is mortal by its very object . . . whether it contradicts the love of God, such as blasphemy or perjury, or the love of neighbor, such as homicide or adultery. . . . But when the sinner’s will is set upon something that of its nature involves a disorder, but is not opposed to the love of God and neighbor, such as thoughtless chatter or immoderate laughter and the like, such sins are venial.130 **
1857 For a *sin *to be mortal, three conditions must together be met: "Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent."131
1858 Grave matter is specified by the Ten Commandments, corresponding to the answer of Jesus to the rich young man: "Do not kill, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and your mother."132 The gravity of sins is more or less great: murder is graver than theft. One must also take into account who is wronged: violence against parents is in itself graver than violence against a stranger.
1859 Mortal sin requires full knowledge and complete consent. It presupposes knowledge of the sinful character of the act, of its opposition to God’s law. It also implies a consent sufficiently deliberate to be a personal choice. Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart133 do not diminish, but rather increase, the voluntary character of a sin.
1860 Unintentional ignorance can diminish or even remove the imputability of a grave offense. But no one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of the moral law, which are written in the conscience of every man. The promptings of feelings and passions can also diminish the voluntary and free character of the offense, as can external pressures or pathological disorders. Sin committed through malice, by deliberate choice of evil, is the gravest. 1861 Mortal sin is a radical possibility of human freedom, as is love itself. It results in the loss of charity and the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell, for our freedom has the power to make choices for ever, with no turning back. However, although we can judge that an act is in itself a grave offense, we must entrust judgment of persons to the justice and mercy of God.
 
Thanks Dave. I think going to mass weekly is very important, and while I think skipping a day of mass is wrong, I wouldn’t consider it (in isolation) worthy of Hell.

It’s cool that you’re a Greek Orthodox but take interest in Catholicism. I didn’t know your religion had saints. That’s pretty interesting! BTW, JPII is a big hero of mine as well. He was a great man…
Yeh I think it’s cool too. Thank you for your remarks. I have been reading some of these posts and I still think you are right Debora. The intent is very important and is the measuring stick for how grave is the sin. For example a young lady had been sexually abused by her father. She spends alot of years in depression and has rejected all kinds of help. One day she decides to take her life. After taking the overdose she realizes what is going to happen and she says she does not want to go. But it is too late and she dies. Certainly God will not see her intent as serious. Years ago she may not have a funeral. But the Church is more understanding today especially to those who have been abused and to those who are mentally ill. How can God put a young girl who has been through enough suffering into hell? No! She did not kill herself. It was her father and the abuse she did not deserve. Certainly God can see that and will not hold the suicide against her. He will have given her all the lifesaving Graces for her at the moment of her death. This is the kind of God we have. Not a merciless one but One full of Mercy and Compassion. I will give you one more example. Let us say a Bishop commits sexual relationships with a woman and there was a layman who commits fornifiaction. To which one owns the greater responsibilty. The Bishop of course. If they both were judged the Bishop will receive the greater verdict. Remember Moses in the OT and because of his sin the Lord commanded that he will not enter the promise land of Israel. Why? In the eyes of God the sin that Moses committed was greater than if a layman had committed it. Moses is the Prophet and he has been given the greater responsibilty to lead God’s people. Therefore any sins he will committ will be heavier in judgement than if a layman who will commit the same sins. The intent is what counts and so is the responsibilty of your office. Missing Mass is not a serious affair if one has the intent to go anyway. I will think that those who we call the two timers will have a more difficult time in judgement than those who only miss Mass twice a year. There is quite a difference in the two. ( Two timers are those who only go at Christmas and Easter ) I will venture to say that it will not be any bothersome to God when the faithful miss a couple of times. He knows your intent. For goodness sake He should know by all those visits you have given Him. He doesn’t need your apology. He needs the truth. And if you love Him remember the Apostles words that " Love can cover a multitude of sins." So love is the measuring stick as well. No words are necessary for that one. Just off the topic here I see you are from Florida. We here on P.E.I. are famous for sandy beaches in the summer and if you have not visited us here why not you and your husband pay P.E.I. a visit and explore our tiny but wonderful Island. The beaches will remind you of home. You can also attend the beautiful Musical based on Anne of Green Gables. I always like to pitch for my Island because we have so much to offer here.
 
Debora

The point of this is, missing ONE mass on purpose, on Sunday, is a mortal sin. ONE mortal sin produces the following

***1035 ***The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, “eternal fire.” The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.

None of us knows the time we will die. therefore, if a mortal sin is committed, don’t make things worse by trying to reduce it down to a misdemeanor or no fault at all. That’s Satan trying to keep people in mortal sin. And he does a great job at it.

16 If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God * will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal… [1 Jn 5:16…] There’s one sure way of ridding the soul of Mortal sin. Sacramental confession

We need to protect our souls vigillantly. And Jesus gave His Catholic Church all the remedies to keep our souls safe

Here again is the scripture telling why missing mass on purpose, is so serious for the individual’s soul.

Heb 10:
23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful; 24 and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, 25 not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near. 26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27* but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries. 28* A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29* How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

Paraphrased
  • do NOT miss mass purposely on Sunday, as is the habit of some
  • notice, it’s already considered a mortal sin to miss mass. Why?
  • because the person who misses mass on purpose, ignores the sacrifice for sin] & by doing so, they profane the [blood of the covenant[/COLOR]]. Both references to the Eucharist. Mt 26:28 28 for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
  • the consequences to that soul for this? A *prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries of God. Does that sound like a misdemeanor? Nope!!! *That consequence mentioned can only describe the result of a mortal sin.
ONE mortal sin is all it takes to end up in hell. Don’t give parking space in your head for anyone who says otherwise.

Steve b,
While I agree with everything you have written there, nevertheless I think you are a little too black and white. Life isn’t as simple as that. If a soul ends up in hell I’m sure there will be more than just one mortal sin on their soul.
Yes, one mortal sin is enough for a soul to end up in hell, but it is unlikely that a conscientious and faithfull Catholic will suddenly decide, one Sunday morning, to say to themselves,
“Oh, stuff it, I’m going to miss Mass this morning, I can’t be bothered”
To talk in terms of a single mortal sin isn’t realistic. People who are in danger of eternal damnation are so, because of a life time of serious sins; a life of carelessness towards the observance of their Catholicism and a cavalier attitude to repentance. Pick and mix Catholics come to mind.
 
You may need to go back and read the CCC.
Mortal sin is quite clearly spelled out.
I read it. How is it contradictory to what I wrote? I was saying that venial sins can ALSO be committed with full knowledge and consent of the will.
 
Yeh I think it’s cool too. Thank you for your remarks. I have been reading some of these posts and I still think you are right Debora. The intent is very important and is the measuring stick for how grave is the sin. For example a young lady had been sexually abused by her father. She spends alot of years in depression and has rejected all kinds of help. One day she decides to take her life. After taking the overdose she realizes what is going to happen and she says she does not want to go. But it is too late and she dies. Certainly God will not see her intent as serious. Years ago she may not have a funeral. But the Church is more understanding today especially to those who have been abused and to those who are mentally ill. How can God put a young girl who has been through enough suffering into hell? No! She did not kill herself. It was her father and the abuse she did not deserve. Certainly God can see that and will not hold the suicide against her. He will have given her all the lifesaving Graces for her at the moment of her death. This is the kind of God we have. Not a merciless one but One full of Mercy and Compassion. I will give you one more example. Let us say a Bishop commits sexual relationships with a woman and there was a layman who commits fornifiaction. To which one owns the greater responsibilty. The Bishop of course. If they both were judged the Bishop will receive the greater verdict. Remember Moses in the OT and because of his sin the Lord commanded that he will not enter the promise land of Israel. Why? In the eyes of God the sin that Moses committed was greater than if a layman had committed it. Moses is the Prophet and he has been given the greater responsibilty to lead God’s people. Therefore any sins he will committ will be heavier in judgement than if a layman who will commit the same sins. The intent is what counts and so is the responsibilty of your office. Missing Mass is not a serious affair if one has the intent to go anyway. I will think that those who we call the two timers will have a more difficult time in judgement than those who only miss Mass twice a year. There is quite a difference in the two. ( Two timers are those who only go at Christmas and Easter ) I will venture to say that it will not be any bothersome to God when the faithful miss a couple of times. He knows your intent. For goodness sake He should know by all those visits you have given Him. He doesn’t need your apology. He needs the truth. And if you love Him remember the Apostles words that " Love can cover a multitude of sins." So love is the measuring stick as well. No words are necessary for that one. Just off the topic here I see you are from Florida. We here on P.E.I. are famous for sandy beaches in the summer and if you have not visited us here why not you and your husband pay P.E.I. a visit and explore our tiny but wonderful Island. The beaches will remind you of home. You can also attend the beautiful Musical based on Anne of Green Gables. I always like to pitch for my Island because we have so much to offer here.
Oh my gosh, I LOVED Anne of Green Gables! I watched all the movies and read some of the books. Canada is a little too cold for living in, but I still think PEI is beautiful, and it’d be a good place to go visit over the summer when it’s warm. 🙂

I do agree that intent has a lot to do with whether or not someone is going to go to Hell for a sin. Because it is what is in our hearts that sends us to Hell, and God knows what is in our hearts. It’s more complicated than simply knowing it is wrong and doing it anyway. We know things are wrong and do them anyway on an almost daily basis, it’s in our fallen nature. Not that it makes it ok, but it is what is in our hearts that makes us go to Hell. It’s a deeper issue, which is why as human beings, we can never say whether someone is or is not saved. It’s up to God.
 
I read it. How is it contradictory to what I wrote? I was saying that venial sins can ALSO be committed with full knowledge and consent of the will.
But they lack the characteristic of being grave matter - in other words they lack the characteristic of being inherently serious sins. You would never in a million years have said ‘I stole 5 cents, and it was a serious sin’. Because it simply isn’t one. That is what distinguishes it from mortal sin.

You yourself admitted, on the other hand, that you knew your sin of skipping Mass WAS serious, that is grave. This is indicated by the fact that you felt the need to confess it - you wouldn’t have run off to confession if you’d stolen five cents, right?
 
Steve b,
While I agree with everything you have written there, nevertheless I think you are a little too black and white. Life isn’t as simple as that. If a soul ends up in hell I’m sure there will be more than just one mortal sin on their soul.
Yes, one mortal sin is enough for a soul to end up in hell, but it is unlikely that a conscientious and faithfull Catholic will suddenly decide, one Sunday morning, to say to themselves,
“Oh, stuff it, I’m going to miss Mass this morning, I can’t be bothered”
To talk in terms of a single mortal sin isn’t realistic. People who are in danger of eternal damnation are so, because of a life time of serious sins; a life of carelessness towards the observance of their Catholicism and a cavalier attitude to repentance. Pick and mix Catholics come to mind.
I’m not Steve, but. . ahem, since when is articulating solid authentic Catholic teachings being 'too ‘black and white?’ Who says so? If something is wrong, it’s wrong. If it’s mortal sin, it’s mortal sin.

And before you leap to the ‘shades of gray’ or all the justifications and the ‘realism’, think a little bit. Stop trying to over-analyse and make excuses (so to speak). That’s the devil talking, "It’s not really your fault, no ‘true’ Catholic is going to deliberately hurt God, it’s all outside forces, you’re not really 100% rejecting him. JUST ONE MORTAL SIN --especially what you ‘think’ is one that is ‘tiny’ or not REALLY mortal sin–is enough. . .

Because (I cannot emphasize this enough) the key here is mortal sin UINREPENTED AT DEATH. Not 'mortal sin committed and repented, or even mortal sin by definition but not fully meeting the three criteria for mortal sin.

IT is NOT, NOT, NOT, "I missed Mass but I was tired or something so it wasn’t really mortal sin."

NOW you are mixing culpability into the equation and trying to use it to ‘excuse’ oneself from the idea that ‘one little mortal sin’ is ‘enough’ to send one to hell.

You’re trying to paint that ‘little mortal sin’ as not being all that mortal, or being ‘so long ago’, or ‘only once’, or 'forced upon one by circumstances.'

NONE of those things matter. They don’t.

What matters is whether the sin was mortal. If it was, by definition it was grave matter, committed with full knowledge and full consent. The culpability issues are tangential; they don’t matter a whit IF the sin is STILL UNREPENTED AT DEATH.

It is UNREPENTED MORTAL SIN through which a person chooses hell (freely).

There is no chance that some ‘poor soul’ is going to make ‘one little mortal sin’ (of COURSE with limited culpability because the poor dear was ‘tired’ or something), not repent, and wind up at death being thrown into hell, screaming and crying for mercy, because he ‘didn’t understand’.


**And it is a disservice to all Christians to even hint that ‘petty mortal sins’ (like missing Mass deliberately) couldn’t POSSIBLY be ‘bad enough’ to damn a person. It’s trying to obscure the point that ANY unrepented (UNREPENTED) mortal sin at death–whether it is missing Mass or stealing or murder–is the free choice whereby a person rejects God freely. **

**Mortal sins aren’t in competition with each other. Please, for the love of God, I hope people will stop the truly wrong-headed, indeed damnable, misdirection that attempts to pit ‘little sins’ against big ones with the idea that the ‘little ones’ can’t POSSIBLY be bad enough to get one to hell. **

MORTAL SIN IS MORTAL SIN and above all, UNREPENTED MORTAL SIN AT DEATH is how a person CHOOSES HELL.
 
Whether I swing an axe wrong and chop my fit off by accident or I deliberately cut it off; my foot is still off.
Any sinful act of serious matter that is partaken of freely will sever the relationship with God.

…Right, and whether you are sorry you cut off your foot or not, your foot still stays off. But if you say sorry to God for having committed a certain sin, it will 100% mend things with God. This is one reason why this example you gave cannot be applied to our relationship to God. It IS about intent. We don’t “accidentally” say NO to God.

Don’t look at it as a comparison between the two acts you outlined, think of it as a direct ‘NO’ to God.
Whether you say ‘no’ the way Judas did or say ‘no’ the way Peter did, you still have said ‘no’.

That’s my point, not everyone commits sins in an attempt to say no to God. It needs to be done deliberately. You need to want to deliberately say no to God. I did not miss mass that day because I wanted to deliberately say NO to God, I missed mass because I was too lazy to go. Like I said, there’s a difference between skipping mass once because you’re feeling lazy, and skipping mass because you don’t want God in your life anymore. One clearly says “NO” to God, while the other is just a consequent of our fallen nature. Both are wrong, but only one is an attempt to kill your relationship with God

Right. But the effect on the relationship to God is still the same.

I disagree. It depends on the person’s intent.

As with any sin we would consider mortal, that would all depend upon the circumstances.

Intent, circumstances, mind set, attitude, etc etc… whether or not someone goes to Hell all depends on these things.

You seem to want to steer this into culpability.
That is fine. But you should keep in mind that missing the Mass is mortal, but there can be reduced culpability.

Culpability plays a big role in whether or not someone is going to Hell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top