S
Searching1
Guest
I have been suffering from scrupulosity in recent months. Let me break it down –
We must remain in a state of grace in order avoid purgatory – or worse, hell – and remaining in a state of grace means confessing all mortal sins and avoiding sin going forward.
Also –
Also, importantly, a sin is not considered “mortal” if it does not meet three criteria: that the subject matter be grave, that your will is fully consenting to the sin, and that it is committed with full knowledge of the sin.
But leaving the discernment to the individual to decide whether one of their sins is mortal or not leads to self justification, right?
You may say "this isn’t a mortal sin because [list reasons here], and those reasons will have to do with why your will wasn’t FULLY consenting (just mostly, perhaps), or that the matter wasn’t really grave, etc.
For instance, there are a MILLION little lies that an otherwise upstanding, reliable, GOOD person makes throughout the year. Lying is a sin, and it’s listed in the commandments that we shall not lie. Isn’t breaking any commandment prima facie grave? No matter if it was financial fraud that benefited me millions of dollars or a lie about having two cats in my apartment instead of only one, even though the landlord only allows one – they are both lies.
Canon law also states we must list our sins and the NUMBER OF TIMES we committed them. How on earth can anyone only go to confession one to three times a year if we will almost assuredly forget how many times we committed the sin? Therefore how can anyone skip confession even one week?
Also, receiving the Eucharist in a state of mortal sin desecrates the sacrament. How can anyone, even someone who just went to confession, ever be pure enough to receive the Eucharist?
So to answer my own question, “isn’t scrupulosity unavoidable?” I would say “no,” and in fact, it seems possible that those who say they are in a state of grace might have merely given themselves a pass. I am scrupulous and try to NEVER give myself a pass, but I am so unhappy because of it and truly exhausted by it.
Some theologians also say moral culpability is lessened or defeated if we are addicts, too. Addicted to sex, to alcohol – the addiction itself may lessen moral culpability because your will isn’t fully consenting. But does it really lessen it? And how do we know if we’re truly addicted? What if we simply tell ourselves that we are (thus giving ourselves a pass). There are clear situations when you are an addict and when you’re not, but there is an ocean of souls somewhere in the middle.
We must remain in a state of grace in order avoid purgatory – or worse, hell – and remaining in a state of grace means confessing all mortal sins and avoiding sin going forward.
Also –
- Following all ten commandments;
- Genuinely taking the beatitudes to heart;
- Avoiding the seven vices by living virtuously; and
- Following the precepts of the Church, praying frequently, and trusting in God.
Also, importantly, a sin is not considered “mortal” if it does not meet three criteria: that the subject matter be grave, that your will is fully consenting to the sin, and that it is committed with full knowledge of the sin.
But leaving the discernment to the individual to decide whether one of their sins is mortal or not leads to self justification, right?
You may say "this isn’t a mortal sin because [list reasons here], and those reasons will have to do with why your will wasn’t FULLY consenting (just mostly, perhaps), or that the matter wasn’t really grave, etc.
For instance, there are a MILLION little lies that an otherwise upstanding, reliable, GOOD person makes throughout the year. Lying is a sin, and it’s listed in the commandments that we shall not lie. Isn’t breaking any commandment prima facie grave? No matter if it was financial fraud that benefited me millions of dollars or a lie about having two cats in my apartment instead of only one, even though the landlord only allows one – they are both lies.
Canon law also states we must list our sins and the NUMBER OF TIMES we committed them. How on earth can anyone only go to confession one to three times a year if we will almost assuredly forget how many times we committed the sin? Therefore how can anyone skip confession even one week?
Also, receiving the Eucharist in a state of mortal sin desecrates the sacrament. How can anyone, even someone who just went to confession, ever be pure enough to receive the Eucharist?
So to answer my own question, “isn’t scrupulosity unavoidable?” I would say “no,” and in fact, it seems possible that those who say they are in a state of grace might have merely given themselves a pass. I am scrupulous and try to NEVER give myself a pass, but I am so unhappy because of it and truly exhausted by it.
Some theologians also say moral culpability is lessened or defeated if we are addicts, too. Addicted to sex, to alcohol – the addiction itself may lessen moral culpability because your will isn’t fully consenting. But does it really lessen it? And how do we know if we’re truly addicted? What if we simply tell ourselves that we are (thus giving ourselves a pass). There are clear situations when you are an addict and when you’re not, but there is an ocean of souls somewhere in the middle.