It Hurts Catholic Apologetics To Suggest Voting For Killers

[Steve40]

Anyone who votes for a Baby Killer has no conscience. Their conscience is dead so the suggestion that you can vote your conscience and vote for a Baby Killer is absolutely wrong.

These false ideas hurt Evangelization and Apologetics. Voting a conscience may involve abstaining from a particular voting race, but there is absolutely no conscience involved in voting for those who condone the killing of children.

 

[Isambard]

Anyone who votes for a Baby Killer has no conscience. Their conscience is dead so the suggestion that you can vote your conscience and vote for a Baby Killer is absolutely wrong.

These false ideas hurt Evangelization and Apologetics. Voting a conscience may involve abstaining from a particular voting race, but there is absolutely no conscience involved in voting for those who condone the killing of children.

Er, you’ll have to be more specific. One side is for “pro-choice”, killing unborn babies in christian eyes, while the other is for killing living babies (and everyone else) in everyone’s eyes:shrug:

 

[Steve40]

Er, you’ll have to be more specific. One side is for “pro-choice”, killing unborn babies in christian eyes, while the other is for killing living babies (and everyone else) in everyone’s eyes:shrug:

What? If both sides want to kill don’t vote for either. A no vote is a vote. Don’t be afraid to use it. Don’t buy into this stuff that a no vote is a half a vote for each. It isn’t. It it is no vote for each.

 

[Sean_Boyle]

Er, you’ll have to be more specific. One side is for “pro-choice”, killing unborn babies in christian eyes, while the other is for killing living babies (and everyone else) in everyone’s eyes:shrug:

flawed thinking on your part.

 

[Isambard]

flawed thinking on your part.

How so?

 

[Biggie]

All I can say is I will not vote for anyone who supports abortion. I don’t care what their position is on other issues. If they can’t get it right on human life, they are unfit for office.