Ite Missa Est

  • Thread starter Thread starter steve99
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
There is so much error in that I don’t know where to begin.

While I defer to the Old Catholic Encyclopedia article cited above, it is also not difficult to find a big enough dictionary to admit to other senses of *mitto, mittere, misi, missus/-a/-um *than “to send”, among them: “to end, cease, bring about, finish” It is not the most common way to say any of those things, but it there it is.

*“You’re still here? It’s over. Go home.” *-- Ferris Bueller
tee
So…'Go it is finished? That seems good latin to me, although theologically more exciting might be 'Go it is brought about [referring to, perhaps (opinion only) the change in us from receiving the Eucharist and the Word, the change that we must live in the world?]
 
Could it be possible that the word Missais a corruption of Mincha? It would make sense to me. In the old Templar Convent in Tomar, Portugal, there is the “Cloister of the Micha”. They called the bread which was given to the poor “micha”, which again I take to be a corruption of Mincha. Just my two cents.
 
Is Mass the same as Missa?
“Mass” is the English form of the late Latin word “Missa,” referring to, well, the Mass (cf. French “Messe,” Spanish “Misa,” etc.). The question is how did the Latin word “Missa” come to be the name of the Eucharistic celebration? The answer is generally understood to be that it comes from the dismissal Ite, missa est. Nobody actually what this means.

As a Latin sentence, this means something like “Go, it has been sent.” (Missa is a form of the Latin verb mitto.) But what has been sent? “Missa” is grammatically feminine, so some feminine noun must be understood as the subject. It might be Hostia, the Host; or congregatio, the congregation; or any of a number of other things. We just don’t know. And neither did mediaeval Catholics. When they heard Ite, missa est, being unable to understand what missa actually referred to, they just heard “Go, it is missa,” and assumed that that meant that the rite they had just attended was something called, for whatever reason, “Missa.”

To take an English example, imagine that the Mass began with the sentence “This ceremony is yclept Mass.” Yclept is, as it turns out, a middle English word meaning “named.” But suppose that that fact were lost while the sentence continued to be spoken at Mass. Would it be any surprise if 500 years later people were walking around saying “Hey, are you going to Yclept Mass tomorrow?”
 
As I noted above: the term Divine Liturgy is the most proper name for the Mass just as it has been retained in the Eastern Churches. Before that we have early Patristic testimony that it was simply called the Eucharist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top