It's All Just Straw?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Genesius
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Genesius

Guest
I had heard somewhere that one of the Church Fathers/Philosophers (I believe it was St. Thomas of Aquinas), nearing the end of his life and considering all of the philosophy and theology he had contemplated and studied his whole life and all his works of charity, etc. in light of his limited mortal understanding and God’s great sovereignty, omniscience, and omnipotence considered the futility of even trying to comprehend it all, and conveyed the famous words, “It’s all just straw!”.

It also brought to my mind the words of the writer of Ecclesiastes, “Vanity, vanity, all things are vanity saith the preacher!” [paraphrase, but fairly close]. Apart from God, of course. That is a given.

Anyway, I was thinking it was St. Thomas of Aquinas. Is that correct? Where can I find it in his writings (even if it was someone else)?
 
Aquinas changed his mind about his work; and told his friend and scribe Reginald of Piperno Reginald, I cannot[Continue Dictating], because all that I have written seems like straw to me.
 
Aquinas changed his mind about his work; and told his friend and scribe Reginald of Piperno Reginald, I cannot[Continue Dictating], because all that I have written seems like straw to me.
Two questions:

What prompted the statement? Was it a glimpse beyond the vail, or a change of heart?

Does this statement mean he rescinds what he had written all of his life as worthless or not true, or does this mean it is true but insignificant to the overall picture in terms of magnitude?
 
Two questions:

What prompted the statement? Was it a glimpse beyond the vail, or a change of heart?

Does this statement mean he rescinds what he had written all of his life as worthless or not true, or does this mean it is true but insignificant to the overall picture in terms of magnitude?
I say we should be careful with the words we use without clear and simple explanation.People tend to spin to suit themselves.
The Church doesn’t have a problem with Aquinas.;):thumbsup:Peace, Carlan
 
I believe St Thomas had what’s referred to as a “mystical experience”, simply a direct experience of God in some manner, which is always a gift of grace. This resulted in him seeing that every way in which we seek to describe God is hugely flawed and inadequate. But the Church recognizes that mans attempts at doing so are fruitful and worthy of pursuing and that St Thomas’ statement, while understandable, doesn’t mean we should scrap the effort or that nothing of his work is of benefit.
 
If it is, as I do believe, that God’s Ways are so far above man’s ways, then man’s way - St Thomas, being among the greatest thinkers, may have realized that his “straw,” albeit real and useful to man, is just straw compared to God’s Ways.

It matters not how great a thinker I can become or how rich and esteemed I can become in this life. It matters only how much I love God and love my neighbor. All else is straw.

IMHO.
 
I believe St Thomas had what’s referred to as a “mystical experience”, simply a direct experience of God in some manner, which is always a gift of grace. This resulted in him seeing that every way in which we seek to describe God is hugely flawed and inadequate. But the Church recognizes that mans attempts at doing so are fruitful and worthy of pursuing and that St Thomas’ statement, while understandable, doesn’t mean we should scrap the effort or that nothing of his work is of benefit.
FHansen:

Exactly. That is my take on it.

God bless,
jd
 
Aquinas changed his mind about his work; and told his friend and scribe Reginald of Piperno Reginald, I cannot[Continue Dictating], because all that I have written seems like straw to me.
He could have been displaying false humility regarding his works, or it could have been the perfect solution fallacy.
 
He could have been displaying false humility regarding his works, or it could have been the perfect solution fallacy.
Neither. St. Thomas wasn’t capable of either. The best book ever written about him is G. K. Chesterton’s St. Thomas, which, while thoroughly readable and witty has been declared the best by top Thomas scholars. It’s deeply insightful into the man and his life.
 
Mijoy2 is on theright track by asking what propted such a statement. Fhansen follows with a very astute comentarry that I woulld agree with. Aquinas had a profound mystical experience during Mass near the end of hisl life, and that statement abou8t straw was made after that event.

Even on a mundane level we can consider a usual course of creative insight deliniated in a recent Newsweek article on creativity.as being useful in understanding such a statement.
we may have experienced some small degree of such a kind ourselves. It is the classic inquiry to exhaustion. In many cases one can break themselves against a problem until nothing seems to be left. Then suddenly there is an intuitive clarity of insight the is beyond the assemblage of intellections that preceeded it.

This kind of phenomenon is not unknown in spiritual pracitce as we might gather from everything from the profound insights of Catholic Saints to the Realization experiences historically recorded in Zen, Buddhist, and other Christian, or not, traditions. Even ateists and agnostics have had profound God realizations, I’m sure. It speaks to me of the Universality of God’s Love for His children that transcends their own labeling of each other and the irrelevant bickering that results from the forms surrounding the sincerity of worship, devotion, comtemplation and meditation. Even such a presentation as this hints at ways of perception that we don’t ordinarily engage, and that even the hidden assumptions of our linguistic structure might inhibit.

Thomas Aquinas created a profound and majestic scaffolding of consistent and peircing inquiry. The structure thus built certainly must have prepareed him for the reception of an experience of humbling immensity. You are sitting at your computer reading this. Go pull upo some of the deep space pictues from Hubble and consider the magnitude of Creation and inquire if the human mind can encompase the enormity of that. But perhaps through dedicated effort the human heart can glimpse to some extent the staggering Meaning of it all.
 
Mijoy2 is on theright track by asking what propted such a statement. Fhansen follows with a very astute comentarry that I woulld agree with. Aquinas had a profound mystical experience during Mass near the end of hisl life, and that statement abou8t straw was made after that event.

Even on a mundane level we can consider a usual course of creative insight deliniated in a recent Newsweek article on creativity.as being useful in understanding such a statement.
we may have experienced some small degree of such a kind ourselves. It is the classic inquiry to exhaustion. In many cases one can break themselves against a problem until nothing seems to be left. Then suddenly there is an intuitive clarity of insight the is beyond the assemblage of intellections that preceeded it.

This kind of phenomenon is not unknown in spiritual pracitce as we might gather from everything from the profound insights of Catholic Saints to the Realization experiences historically recorded in Zen, Buddhist, and other Christian, or not, traditions. Even ateists and agnostics have had profound God realizations, I’m sure. It speaks to me of the Universality of God’s Love for His children that transcends their own labeling of each other and the irrelevant bickering that results from the forms surrounding the sincerity of worship, devotion, comtemplation and meditation. Even such a presentation as this hints at ways of perception that we don’t ordinarily engage, and that even the hidden assumptions of our linguistic structure might inhibit.

Thomas Aquinas created a profound and majestic scaffolding of consistent and peircing inquiry. The structure thus built certainly must have prepareed him for the reception of an experience of humbling immensity. You are sitting at your computer reading this. Go pull upo some of the deep space pictues from Hubble and consider the magnitude of Creation and inquire if the human mind can encompase the enormity of that. But perhaps through dedicated effort the human heart can glimpse to some extent the staggering Meaning of it all.
The pale blue dot! Yes, it does help to consider the magnitude of it all. I agree. Yet, we both come away from that with different conclusions.

I am trying to be as open to yours as anyone can be. It has been a while now, and frankly I am wondering if I was predestined to not be a child of God. I do dislike the very idea that the fundamentalists could be right about a person like me. Since I believe they are so very wrong about so many things.
 
The pale blue dot! Yes, it does help to consider the magnitude of it all. I agree. Yet, we both come away from that with different conclusions.

I am trying to be as open to yours as anyone can be. It has been a while now, and frankly I am wondering if I was predestined to not be a child of God. I do dislike the very idea that the fundamentalists could be right about a person like me. Since I believe they are so very wrong about so many things.
I suggest checking out some of our predestination debates.

I of course do not believe that about you or anybody else.
 
Thank you all for your wonderful answers, as well as the resources. I will be checking them out. Godbless.

To Strawberry Jam I would say that although there are Christians (Catholic or otherwise) that need a boost of faith once in a while, or some supernatural experience to continue believing in God, there are others who don’t. I have always been one of the latter. However, God did bless me with many miraculous events in my life just the same. I was washed out in the ocean at 10 yrs old, I lived through a house fire when I was very young, and I survived Leukemia (AML), the most aggressive form. It was during this struggle that He gave me a very strong sense of certainty about all the basic things I had been taught about God; His reality, the afterlife, etc. Prior to this I had a very strong ‘hope’ and ‘belief’, but what He illuminated to me at that point was an absolute certainty. I am no longer frightened at the prospect of the unknown when it comes to my own mortalilty and what comes after. I pray that He reveals something similar to you. 🙂
 
I am trying to be as open to yours as anyone can be. It has been a while now, and frankly I am wondering if I was predestined to not be a child of God. I do dislike the very idea that the fundamentalists could be right about a person like me. Since I believe they are so very wrong about so many things.
The fundamentalists may be right about a few things, but they’re very wrong about the bigger picture. In the Catholic world, we’d say that the discovery of God is a journey - an adventure. You have (admirably) opened yourself to our view, and that means that you’re open to various possibilities in your life. For us, the pale blue dot represents the inexhaustible mystery that God placed in the universe. That’s a reason for joy, not despair. It’s joy because it means that no fundamentalist can claim that they know our pre-destiny (and therefore future) – they don’t even fully know their own.

But why would this “ignorance” be a cause for joy? Well, first, it liberates us from pre-determination and control. It gives us the freedom to learn. But it’s not purposeless learning, but learning about our Creator. He wants us to seek answers – again, because that is part of the adventure.

Mystery is inherent in everything we consider beautiful. That’s the beauty of faith – to trust God. We observe the pale blue dot, but if we do not have a sense of wonder, then it’s just another speck of nothingness. That’s the danger of scientism and reductionism – reducing the wonder and mystery that is present all around us.

Why is there so much order and harmony and symmetry on this planet? The cycles of nature – birth, decay, rebirth – the amazing properties of so many natural elements: water, air, soil, energy. Again, it takes some openness to realize that there is much to marvel at.

Personally, I think you should cultivate that part of your inner self. That’s like a spiritual act in a way – just stepping back from science, and being open, and then recognizing the mystery of life.
 
ReggieM, I agree with your encouraging SJ to wonder. I might even add "miracle,’ as long as we remember that “any sufficiently advanced technology appears to be magic.” ~A. Clarke. Remember about the cargo cults? Or imagine someone from our Lord’s time or Moses’ witnessing the operation of a remote control of a TV or car!

Yes, scientism or reductionism have their dangers. But even if we destroy the Earth in the process, perhaps knowledge is preferable to ignorance. At least we gave it a try, and now that we know that there are many candidates in our galaxy that may prove to be Earth like planets,* maybe someone out there is, unlike us, mature enough to put wisdom before technology. And that is following the arrogant and xenophobic assumption that all God’s children must look like us.

Your admonition reminded me of my time at the OpSci department of the UofA in Tucson when the big news there was the VATT, or “The Pope Scope” on nearby Mt. Graham, only one avenue of scietific, rational, and intellectual exploration dear to the Church. You can read a short bit on it here. The Church doesn’t rely just on faith. This instrument was, at its “grand opening,” the most advanced bit of astronomical gear on the planet. A planet, I might add, which in our understanding has gone from being the center of the Universe, to being lost somewhere in a 13 billion light year radius sphere. Even our 100,000 light year dia. galaxy is lost in that, and in turn our greatest limit of perception is commonly thought to be a tiny part of what lies past where we can’t see beyond. Talk about inconceivable wonder!

So that makes me question what appears to be your limiting consideration stated as “Why is there so much order and harmony and symmetry on this planet?” Certainly that is where we experientially encounter most or all of our opportunities to wonder. And yet, isn’t it in the face of what we know today a kind of, though personally spectacular to us, limited consideration?

Certainly the wonders ordained by God are distributed as order, harmony, and symmetry throughout all of His Creation. Indeed, my own guess would be that life is not the existence we perceive and enjoy, mostly, but the pressure of living experience manifesting itself as a continued Creation in every particle of all the astonishing immensity we don’t see because of our narrow focus on this pale blue dot and our speck on it.

So much of what we read on here, ReggieM, has to do with how a particular “me” is dealing with circumstances according to their own limited perceptions and assumptions, Catholic though they may be. We tend, I feel, to forget the unimaginable vastness of actual possibility and the tiny bit of spectrum that we actually use in looking at it “through a glass, darkly.”

I’m guessing that Aquinas was able, due to his diligence, to hone his receptivity to something far beyond our ordinary “scope” of spiritual “understanding” which tends heavily to be faith as distinct from knowledge. But he did that by honing his mind and conforming it to the principles of the Faith as he understood it. We have no less of an opportunity, and must not neglect that part of conscious aware experience that would make us receptive to miracles beyond the mind exhausted by inquiry, especially self-inquiry.
Code:
*To date, there are 471 confirmed exoplants, with a recent addition of 400 serious candidates out of 700 possibles recently discovered by the Kepler telescope team.
 
antroji - thanks for your interesting considerations. Yes, one must keep various points of view in mind. On this topic, however, we’re looking a single point St. Thomas’ spiritual development – so, I think it’s worth focusing on that.

What he was really pointing to was the supremacy of the authentic mystical encounter – the intimate experience of God over what is produced by natural reason. Science can only observe the superficial aspects. Philosophy also can only use reason and nature. Theology is superior to this because it discusses the workings of God. But theology still uses a natural process of reasoning.

St. Thomas considers all of that straw *in comparison with * the direct experience. That is, science is not valueless in itself – but in comparison with the mystical encounter it’s really nothing.

So, the search for God needs to include this aspect.

For ordinary Catholics like myself – prayer is our mystical encounter. Prayer is our path to union, rising above nature, above scientism, and above rationalism.

This is really the path of Catholic spiritual growth. We use reason as a springboard. But the springboard is designed to get us up into the air. If we cling to the springboard, or pretend that it’s the goal or end, then we’ve reduced reality to rationalism.

The biggest danger we have is not thinking that the Church says “faith only” but that everything must be reduced to rational understanding. That’s our society today – dominated by scientism and technology.
So that makes me question what appears to be your limiting consideration stated as “Why is there so much order and harmony and symmetry on this planet?” Certainly that is where we experientially encounter most or all of our opportunities to wonder. And yet, isn’t it in the face of what we know today a kind of, though personally spectacular to us, limited consideration?
I don’t really follow this. Through “what we know today” … I would say that it’s an unlimited consideration. When we encounter the infinite, then there’s no limit. We also encounter inexplicable precision and harmony in life and the universe.
Indeed, my own guess would be that life is not the existence we perceive and enjoy, mostly, but the pressure of living experience manifesting itself as a continued Creation in every particle of all the astonishing immensity we don’t see because of our narrow focus on this pale blue dot and our speck on it.
Ok, I really don’t want to sound insulting, or even to argue (I respect and appreciate your views), but I can’t make sense of what you think life is.
So much of what we read on here, ReggieM, has to do with how a particular “me” is dealing with circumstances according to their own limited perceptions and assumptions, Catholic though they may be. We tend, I feel, to forget the unimaginable vastness of actual possibility and the tiny bit of spectrum that we actually use in looking at it “through a glass, darkly.”
I fully agree, and I think that was St. Thomas’ point.
I’m guessing that Aquinas was able, due to his diligence, to hone his receptivity to something far beyond our ordinary “scope” of spiritual “understanding” which tends heavily to be faith as distinct from knowledge.
Agreed. In this case, a different kind of knowledge.

The Book of Wisdom
Chapter 13

For all men were by nature foolish who were in ignorance of God, and who from the good things seen did not succeed in knowing him who is, and from studying the works did not discern the artisan;

But either fire, or wind, or the swift air, or the circuit of the stars, or the mighty water, or the luminaries of heaven, the governors of the world, they considered gods.

Now if out of joy in their beauty they thought them gods, let them know how far more excellent is the Lord than these; for the original source of beauty fashioned them.

Or if they were struck by their might and energy, let them from these things realize how much more powerful is he who made them.

For from the greatness and the beauty of created things their original author, by analogy, is seen.

But yet, for these the blame is less; For they indeed have gone astray perhaps, though they seek God and wish to find him.

For they search busily among his works, but are distracted by what they see, because the things seen are fair.

But again, not even these are pardonable.

For if they so far succeeded in knowledge that they could speculate about the world, how did they not more quickly find its LORD?

For the works of the Highest only are wonderful, and his works are glorious, secret, and hidden.” (Ecclus 11:4).

“And I understood that man can find no reason of all those works of God that are done under the sun: and the more he shall labor to seek, so much the less shall he find: yea, though the wise man shall say, that he knoweth it, he shall not be able to find it.” (Eccl 8:17).
 
But even if we destroy the Earth in the process, perhaps knowledge is preferable to ignorance. At least we gave it a try…
It certainly depends on whether God wanted that result or not, doesn’t it? He will certainly judge such a thing. Anyone, for example, who would risk the destruction of the world to further their own curiosity for knowledge may be quite evil in so doing.
 
According to the Faith, God allowed the death of his own Son. It seems foolish to believe that He will intervene, other than “messages” to the choir in any course of action humanity as a whole takes, as is clearly evident so far. It is up to the individual to change himself, a la the CS Lewis comment on why he prayed.

As for faith and mystical insight relevant to the next previous post, I myself had a life changing spiritual experience when I was 17. Whereas before I had faith, I now have knowledge of God Being. I have no flicker of doubt. But what in part impressed me as a result of that rather astonishing insight was a clarity on the unlimited degree of agency we have in the determination of our own fate and that of the race. It is pretty clear to me that Jesus is not going to come down and say “OK, everybody out of the gene pool!” not any time soon, anyway. It’s on us, and we are taking little circumspection as to the actual dynamics of our presence here, as far as I can tell.

God IS and Love IS, and it is up to us to use our resources to discover how that is and what to do. Augustine “broke through.” There is no doubt about that. So did Catherine of Sienna and others. But that is not the general level of achievement of the laity or of the race, of which those of our Fath are less than 1/3. Straw is about all the masses have, as emotionally meaningful and useful as it might be. Having not much else, we just like its taste and texture.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top