G
GKC
Guest
And, of course, you know. And I do too.We could make a rule that nobody can post unless we know whether they’re Catholic or Protestant.
JK.Now back to regular programming …
And, of course, you know. And I do too.We could make a rule that nobody can post unless we know whether they’re Catholic or Protestant.
JK.Now back to regular programming …
Well, to be serious for a moment yes I think I do. Unless I’m misremembering you describe yourself as Catholic not Protestant … not to be confused with Fr. Robert Hart who says Catholic and Protestant.And, of course, you know. And I do too.
Yes.Well, to be serious for a moment yes I think I do. Unless I’m misremembering you describe yourself as Catholic not Protestant … not to be confused with Fr. Robert Hart who says Catholic and Protestant.
One can be Catholic and Protestant, Catholic and/or Protestant, Catholic not Protestant, Protestant not Catholic? I suppose we should throw in Orthodox in there, too. And Confused Catholic and/or Protestant and/or Orthodox, etc. The possibilities boggle the mind. And Catholic not to be confused with Fr. H. and Confused Prostant not Orthodox not confused…Yes.
I am never to be confused with Fr. H.
Another occasion for the use of the term “motley”.One can be Catholic and Protestant, Catholic and/or Protestant, Catholic not Protestant, Protestant not Catholic? I suppose we should throw in Orthodox in there, too. And Confused Catholic and/or Protestant and/or Orthodox, etc. The possibilities boggle the mind. And Catholic not to be confused with Fr. H. and Confused Prostant not Orthodox not confused…
then there are beasts like not(not(not(Catholic or Orthodox) not (confused and Father H.)) or not Protestant and confused).
I hope that straightens it out. Lucidity in logic is my mission.
I think of it more as covering all the bases.Another occasion for the use of the term “motley”.
Similar. If more bases are invented, Anglicans will cover them. If not, invent them.I think of it more as covering all the bases.
I can’t even imagine what is wrong with Amazing Grace.There are a few songs which are sung in Catholic mass now that are in the We Celebrate books but came nothing short of some controversy. I would say “Amazing Grace” and “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God” are the most extraordinary to be in Catholic praise books. Not that they aren’t beautiful songs, but just the history and what they represent.
Wrong? I think that might be a bit much. While I do not agree with the argument against it, it usually has to do more with what it might imply, especially once saved, always saved. But like I said, it only might imply something that might be misunderstood. It is one of my favorite hymns and never had any issue with it.I can’t even imagine what is wrong with Amazing Grace.
I like Amazing Grace. But I get the feeling some people check under their pew first thing at Mass to be sure no one has carved OSAS there, and they are the first to remind you when you say that Jesus saves, that you could commit a mortal sin and die and go to hell at any second, so watch yourself, and that works without faith is dead, so you better get cracking.Wrong? I think that might be a bit much. While I do not agree with the argument against it, it usually has to do more with what it might imply, especially once saved, always saved. But like I said, it only might imply something that might be misunderstood. It is one of my favorite hymns and never had any issue with it.
On a side note, in 2004, it was one of my first posts here that argued the case against Amazing Grace was poor.
Whoa, what am I, Protestant or something?… when you say that Jesus saves
Somewhere just now some anti-Catholic has read that and has fallen off his hobby-horse.Whoa, what am I, Protestant or something?
“Together we confess: By grace alone, in faith in Christ’s saving work and not because of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and receive the Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good works.”
vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_31101999_cath-luth-joint-declaration_en.html