P
paul_c
Guest
Actually, Erik, there are tons of quotes and references to the Deuterocanonical books in the rest of scripture. scripturecatholic.com/deuterocanon.htmlThe Council of Trent re-affirmed earlier council decisions. Councils are usually called upon due to problematic issues that arise within Christianity. A perfect example is the first ever Christian council, the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15) which dealt on the issue of Christian circumcision. In similar ways, councils have been orchestrated by the Catholic Church for the last 2000 years. Most councils, as did the council of Jerusalem, deal with problems of the Church and decide on them authoritatively as happened in Acts 15. During the time of the reformation, the Council of Trent addressed the heresies brought about by the reformation of, among others, an excommunicated Priest, one Martin Luther. Because Luther considered removing a total of eleven Books from the Bible, and later settled on seven, the Council addressed this issue and reaffirmed earlier council canons proclaiming the Canonicity of the Bible. Remember, the first ever Bible was put together at the end of the 4th century, and it included all the same Books that the Catholic Bible includes today. Included below is a link to the Council of Carthage in 419 AD. Look for Canon 24 (about ¼ down the page) and you’ll see a list of 71 Books. The reason it’s 71 and not 73 is because the Book of Baruch as well as the Book of Lamentations was at that time combined into the Book of Jeremiah. It wasn’t until sometime later that these Books were separated into their own individual works.
newadvent.org/fathers/3816.htm
The Jews also rejected Christ. Remember a division arose between the Jews and Gentiles during the time of Christ’s earthly ministry. A separation had to be made between the Jews that rejected Christ and the Gentiles that accepted and glorified Him. This form of division led to the Council of Jamnia which concluded to accept the Tanakh instead of the Septuagint. The Septuagint was the Bible that the Apostled used, which would have made it the Bible that Christ used. The Septuagint had every Book of the current Catholic Old Testament as well as others which are not considered Canonical by the Church.
The King James Version of the Bible has five old Testament books that do not have direct quotations to the New Testament. These books are: Esther, Ecclesiastes, Canticle of Canticles (a.k.a. Song of Solomon, a.k.a. Song of Songs), 1 Esdras (a.k.a. Ezra), and 2 Esdras (a.k.a. Nehemiah). If you added the Deuterocanonical 7 Books, that’s 12 Books without direct quotations. That would reduce the Bible to just 61 books. The fact that Jesus did not quote from these Books does not take away from their Canonicity.
Can you clarify this question for me? I’m not sure what you mean.
By the way, did you find my analysis of Psalm 69 interesting?
In fact, there was a thread on this subject: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=4624