January 31: Reflections On the Scripture Readings for This Sunday's Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fidelis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fidelis

Guest
To help you prepare for this coming Sunday, here are the readings and reflections for this coming Sunday’s Scripture readings. This Sunday in the Gospel Reading, we hear the conclusion to the story we heard last week of Jesus’ visit to the synagogue in his hometown of Nazareth.

Here are the Scripture readings from the U.S. Catholic bishops website.

My own weekly study (along with Don Schwager’s meditation) can be found here under “Current Study.”

Reflections on the Sunday Scriptures to share with the younger ones in your family by Emily and Jeff Cavins can be found at Family Night .

Here also are links to audio reflections on the Gospel reading by Dr. Scott Hahn and Fr. Robert Barron.

The Navarre Bible Commentary for each reading can be viewed here.

Further study resources for the Readings can be found here and here.

Here are trio of recorded weekly Bible studies, each about an hour long:
– St. Martha Catholic Church Adult Faith Formation

– Franciscan Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother

– Sunday Gospel Scripture Study

Discussion and charitible comments are always welcome. Have a blessed and holy Lord’s day!

 
The First Reading is from from Jeremiah 1:4-5, 17-19. From the study aids linked above:

Jeremiah, one of the greatest prophets of Old Testament times, lived in a turbulent and eventually fatal period of Jewish history (600-550 circa). The people (and most of their kings) had for years neglected the things of God. They admired the pagan nations and too often the pagan gods. God let the pagan nations punish them. Jeremiah is the second of the four great prophets of Israel; a contemporary of Zephaniah, Nahum, and Habakkuk. He was born in the last part of the reign of Manasseh, about 645 years before the birth of Jesus and almost a century after Isaiah.

Called by God to be a prophet at the age of 19, he remained unmarried and celibate by order of Yahweh (Jeremiah 16:2). For more than 40 years, up to his death, he remained faithful to his vocation and prophesied until after the fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 B.C. In the 52 chapters of this book, oracles alternate with passages of history which confirm and illustrate the prophecies.

The book as we have it does not follow a chronological or other order because it is, as Saint Jerome described, more a collection of writings than a book in the proper sense. These writings consist of a series of warnings and threats of divine retribution for the unfaithfulness of the chosen people and also for the behavior of the neighboring peoples.

Our reading for today comes from the prologue which gives an account of his calling. It is a dialog between Yahweh and Jeremiah.
The word of the LORD came to me, saying: Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I dedicated you, a prophet to the nations I appointed you.
But do you gird your loins; stand up and tell them all that I command you. Be not crushed on their account, as though I would leave you crushed before them;for it is I this day who have made you a fortified city, a pillar of iron, a wall of brass, against the whole land: against Judah’s kings and princes, against its priests and people. They will fight against you but not prevail over you, for I am with you to deliver you, says the LORD.
The RSV translation renders it:
The Lord calls Jeremiah
-----------------------------------

[4] Now the word of the Lord came to me saying,[5] “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
[17] But you, gird up your loins; arise, and say to them everything that I command you.Do not be dismayed by them, lest I dismay you before them.[18] And I, behold, I make you this day a fortified city, an iron pillar, and bronze walls, against the whole land, against the kings of Judah, its princes, its priests, and the people of the land.[19] They will fight against you; but they shall not prevail against you, for I am with you, says the Lord, to deliver you."
 
The First Reading, as we’ll hear it in Mass this weekend, is as noted above part of the account that appears at the beginning of Jeremiah which describes the prophet’s calling by God. Verses 6 through 10, omitted from the Reading, is a beautiful and well known discourse between God and Jeremiah in which the young prophet expresses his feelings of inadequacy in fulfilling such an exalted and dangerous role:
Jeremiah 1:6-10 (RSV)
[6] Then I said, “Ah, Lord God! Behold, I do not know how to speak, for I am only a youth.” But the Lord said to me, “Do not say, ‘I am only a youth’; for to all to whom I send you you shall go, and whatever I command you you shall speak.[8] Be not afraid of them, for I am with you to deliver you.
[9] Then the Lord put forth his hand and touched my mouth; and the Lord said to me,
“Behold, I have put my words in your mouth. [10] See, I have set you this day over nations and over kingdoms,to pluck up and to break down, to destroy and to overthrow, to build up and to plant.”
(The remainder of the omitted verses contains God’s words concerning the coming destruction of Jerusalem and Judah for their unfaithfulness to God, particularly their worshipping of and sacrificing to the idols of the pagan nations among them.)

Comparing this passage with the Gospel from last week and this week, can you see any parallels between the call of Jeremiah and that of Jesus? :confused:
 
Jeremiah began his role as a prophet at the young age of 19 during the reign of King Josiah, who was also a young man at the time. Josiah was one of the few kings of Judah that “walked in a way pleasing to the Lord.” (2 Kings 22–23). He tried to reform the kingdom, bringing back the study and observance of the Law, and threw out the idolators and sorcerers. With so many things in common, he and Jeremiah must have had a very positive relationship.

Josiah could not completely turn back God’s wrath from idolatrous Israel, however, and the time of it’s destruction eventually came. Josiah himself met an untimely death on the battlefield fighting the Egyptian Pharoah, Neco, on the plain of Meggido.

There is an interesting parallel between good King Josiah, young ruler of Judah, and Jesus in this Sunday’s Gospel reading. When we get to the Gospel, we’ll look at it.
 
:hmmm: Here are some more questions for personal reflection on this reading:
  1. How do you think “the word of the Lord” came to Jeremiah: (a) Voice from the clouds? (b) Human-sounding voice? (c) Inner voice?
  2. How far back does God’s relationship with Jeremiah go (v. 5)? How involved was God in preparing Jeremiah?
  3. Do you trust thaat God has a wonderful plan for your life? Or do you feel somewhat like Jeremiah–dubious and fearful?
  4. How does the Lord communicate with you: Are his plans for you always clear or never clear? What role does Scripture and Church teaching play? What about advice, hunches, prayer, circumstances?
  5. (From previous post) Comparing this passage with the Gospel from last week and this week, can you see any parallels between the call of Jeremiah and that of Jesus?
(Questions adapted from The Catholic Serendipity Bible for Personal and Small Group Study, New American Bible; Zondervan, 1999)
 
Here is the Second Reading from St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians, Chapter 12, verse 31 through Chapter 13, verse 13 (you may hear a slightly shorter version in your parish this weekend):
Brothers and sisters:
Strive eagerly for the greatest spiritual gifts. But I shall show you a still more excellent way.
If I speak in human and angelic tongues, but do not have love, I am a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal. And if I have the gift of prophecy, and comprehend all mysteries and all knowledge; if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give away everything I own, and if I hand my body over so that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.
Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, it is not pompous, It is not inflated, it is not rude, it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick-tempered, it does not brood over injury, it does not rejoice over wrongdoing but rejoices with the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never fails.
If there are prophecies, they will be brought to nothing; if tongues, they will cease; if knowledge, it will be brought to nothing. For we know partially and we prophesy partially, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away.
When I was a child, I used to talk as a child, think as a child, reason as a child; when I became a man, I put aside childish things. At present we see indistinctly, as in a mirror, but then face to face. At present I know partially; then I shall know fully, as I am fully known. So faith, hope, love remain, these three; but the greatest of these is love.
 
This Sunday’s Second Reading (continuing from the last two Sundays) is from St. Paul’s 1st Letter to the Corinthians. To refresh our memories on the context of this passage, here is a bit of brief background that was provided last week which is found in the *previous *week’s Catholic Matters:
Corinth was a Roman colony, materially prosperous but morally corrupt, when St. Paul came to preach the gospel there in the year 50 A.D. He made some converts among the Jews and many among the Gentiles during his two years stay there. He left for Ephesus in 52 and from there he wrote this letter to his converts correcting some abuses of which he had heard and adding further explanations to the message he had already preached to them. In the eight verses read to you [last Sunday], St. Paul is referring to the marvelous gifts God gave to the new converts. These were common at that time and most helpful for the spread of the faith; they ceased when the Church was solidly established. As St. Augustine says—“one waters a newly-planted tree but when it has taken root it is watered no longer.”
Judging from the two letters to the Corinthians we have from St. Paul, the Church at Corinth had it’s share of problems including power struggles, cliqueishness, and even incest. Paul had heard of these problems (probably from someone reporting from the Corinthian Church) and was writing in an attempt to bring some order and orthodoxy to the situation.

One of the problems stemmed out of one of the blessings the Corinthians had recieved: that of the presence of a multitude of spiritual gifts given to them through the Holy Spirit. These gifts were meant for the edification and the building up of the Church as a whole. In Corinth, however, it seems that some people had begun to look at these gifts as personal ones as well as developing the attiude that some gifts were superior to others even to the point of thinking the lesser gifts were inconsequential. Paul writes to dispell this notion.
 
The Corinthians have been disputing among themselves about which gifts within their church were the greatest. Some apparently favored the charismatic and ecstatic gifts (likes tongues and prophecy), while others thought little of those in comparison to the more task orientated gifts (like teaching and administration). Paul encourages them to indeed strive for the highest spiritual gifts that God is pleased to grant them:
Strive eagerly for the greatest spiritual gifts.
But he wants to firmly keep all those gifts in perspective to what they should really all be striving for:
But I shall show you a still more excellent way.
Paul holds one gift in the highest possible esteem; one gift that is critical to ALL Christians no matter what other gifts they may possess:
If I speak in human and angelic tongues, but do not have love, I am a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal. And if I have the gift of prophecy, and comprehend all mysteries and all knowledge; if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give away everything I own, and if I hand my body over so that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.
St. Paul is speaking about the theological virtue of love (or charity). He makes a slight digression to descibe what this virtue of charity is (probably with an eye to how the Corinthians were behaving toward each other):
Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, it is not pompous, It is not inflated, it is not rude, it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick-tempered, it does not brood over injury, it does not rejoice over wrongdoing but rejoices with the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never fails.
Paul goes down a list of gifts (probably the one’s the Corinthians were disputing about and holding in such high esteem or else disdaining) and, comparing them to charity, basically saying that, in the big scheme of things, they amount to nothing but useless noise, and are reduced to nothing. This must have been hard for the Corinthians, as proud as they were of these gifts, to swallow. He goes on to tell them why this is so:
If there are prophecies, they will be brought to nothing; if tongues, they will cease; if knowledge, it will be brought to nothing. For we know partially and we prophesy partially, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away.
When I was a child, I used to talk as a child, think as a child, reason as a child; when I became a man, I put aside childish things. At present we see indistinctly, as in a mirror, but then face to face. At present I know partially; then I shall know fully, as I am fully known.
What St. Paul is saying is that, as wonderful and helpful as these gifts are, they serve a limited purpose for a limited time. While they should make prudent use of these gifts, they should not esteem the gifts in themselves, but instead honor God who gives them by using them for the purpose they were given. They are to do this while never neglecting the most important gift, that of charity toward their neighbor…
So faith, hope, love remain, these three; but the greatest of these is love.
These three theological virtues are the greatest gifts a Christian can receive: Supernatural faith enables us to believe God and his promises; hope keeps us confident that God will never abandon us and will lead us to heaven in the end if we believe in him and obey him. But both of these gifts will cease at the end of time or when we arrive home in heaven (whichever comes first). After that point we won’t need them anymore since we will have achieved the goal they were given to us to attain. But charity will remain with us in heaven for ever and ever. Indeed, it is the main occupation of heaven.
 
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) has several references to this passage. They include the following sections:
13 735, 800**
13:1-4 1826
13:4-7 1825
13:5 953
13:8 773
13:12 163, 164, 314, 1023*, 1720*, 2519*,
13:13 1813*, 1826, 1841*
(an asterisk* means the verse is referred to within that section of the Catechism but not cited directly)
The Catechism’s section on the virtue of charity is worth quoting in full here:
**Charity **
1822 Charity is the theological virtue by which we love God above all things for his own sake, and our neighbor as ourselves for the love of God.
1823 Jesus makes charity the new commandment.96 By loving his own "to the end,"97 he makes manifest the Father’s love which he receives. By loving one another, the disciples imitate the love of Jesus which they themselves receive. Whence Jesus says: “As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you; abide in my love.” And again: "This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you."98
1824 Fruit of the Spirit and fullness of the Law, charity keeps the commandments of God and his Christ: "Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love."99
**1825 **Christ died out of love for us, while we were still "enemies."100 The Lord asks us to love as he does, even our enemies, to make ourselves the neighbor of those farthest away, and to love children and the poor as Christ himself.101
The Apostle Paul has given an incomparable depiction of charity: "charity is patient and kind, charity is not jealous or boastful; it is not arrogant or rude. Charity does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right. Charity bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things."102
1826 “If I . . . have not charity,” says the Apostle, “I am nothing.” Whatever my privilege, service, or even virtue, "if I . . . have not charity, I gain nothing."103 Charity is superior to all the virtues. It is the first of the theological virtues: "So faith, hope, charity abide, these three. But the greatest of these is charity."104
1827 The practice of all the virtues is animated and inspired by charity, which “binds everything together in perfect harmony”;105 it is the form of the virtues; it articulates and orders them among themselves; it is the source and the goal of their Christian practice. Charity upholds and purifies our human ability to love, and raises it to the supernatural perfection of divine love.
1828 The practice of the moral life animated by charity gives to the Christian the spiritual freedom of the children of God. He no longer stands before God as a slave, in servile fear, or as a mercenary looking for wages, but as a son responding to the love of him who “first loved us”:106
If we turn away from evil out of fear of punishment, we are in the position of slaves. If we pursue the enticement of wages, . . . we resemble mercenaries. Finally if we obey for the sake of the good itself and out of love for him who commands . . . we are in the position of children.107
**1829 **The fruits of charity are joy, peace, and mercy; charity demands beneficence and fraternal correction; it is benevolence; it fosters reciprocity and remains disinterested and generous; it is friendship and communion: Love is itself the fulfillment of all our works. There is the goal; that is why we run: we run toward it, and once we reach it, in it we shall find rest.108
96 Cf. Jn 13:34.
97 Jn 13:1.
98 Jn 15:9,12.
99 Jn 15:9-10; cf. Mt 22:40; Rom 13:8-10.
100 Rom 5:10.
101 Cf. Mt 5:44; Lk 10:27-37; Mk 9:37; Mt 25:40, 45.
102 1 Cor 13:4-7.
103 1 Cor 13:1-4.
104 1 Cor 13:13.
105 Col 3:14.
106 Cf. 1 Jn 4:19.
107 St. Basil, Reg. fus. tract., prol. 3:PG 31,896B.
108 St. Augustine, In ep. Jo. 10,4:PL 35,2057.
 
St. Paul is clear that the overiding priciple of the Christian life is charity. Charity is even more important than faith and will be the definitive factor in how God will judge us at the end of our lives:
**From: Matthew 25:31-46
The Last Judgment
-----------------**
[31] "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with im, then He will sit on His glorious throne. [32] Before Him will be gathered all the nations, and He will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, [33] and He will place the sheep at His right hand, but the goats at the left. [34] Then the King will say to those at His right hand, Come, O blessed of My Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; [35] for I was hungry and you gave Me food, I was thirsty and you gave Me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed Me, [36] I was naked and you clothed Me, I was sick and you visited Me, I was in prison and you came to Me.' [37] Then the righteous will answer Him, Lord, when did we see Thee hungry and feed thee, or thirsty and give thee drink? [38] And when did we see Thee a stranger and welcome Thee, or naked and clothe Thee? [39] And when did we see Thee sick or in prison and visit Thee?’ [40] And the King will answer them, `Truly I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of My brethren, you did it to Me.’
[41] Then He will say to those at His left hand, Depart from Me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; [42] for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink, [43] I was a stranger and you did not welcome Me, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.' [44] Then they also will answer, Lord, when did we see Thee hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to Thee?’ [45] Then He will answer them, `Truly, I say to you, as you did it not to one of the least of these, you did it not to Me.’ [46] And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
 
Finally, for the Second Reading, here are some “Questions for Application” taken from The Ignatius Study Bible; The First and Second Letters of St. Paul to the Corinthians (Ignatius Press, 2004):

13:1-3. Who loses when works of great spiritual power are done with impure or uncharitible motives? In these three “if…then” statements, what happens to the “then” half? If you have ever done good acts for bad motives, what have been the consequences for you?

**13:5. **If love is not arrogant, what is it? If love is not rude, what is it? If love does not insist on it’s own way, how does it act toward the other person? If love is not irritable or resentful, what is it’s attitude?

13:7. What does it mean to bear, believe, hope and endure “all things”? How do you think love (charity) might respond to falsehoods, lies, and personal attacks on others? What does God ask when the going gets rough for you?

13:11. What are some of the “childish ways” that might characterize the response of people to charismatic expressions–whether they consider themselves charismatic or not? In the context of this chapter, what is a more adult way of viewing charismatic spirituality?
 
We turn now to the Gospel Reading for this Sunday. Just as our Second Reading from 1 Corinthians was a continuation of last week’s Second Reading, so too is this week’s Gospel the conclusion of the story of Jesus in the synagogue at Nazareth we heard last week (if you missed last week’s study thread, you can find it here.)

Here is the text of the Gospel Reading as we hear it at Sunday’s liturgy:
Luke 4:21-30
Jesus began speaking in the synagogue, saying: “Today this Scripture passage is fulfilled in your hearing.” And all spoke highly of him and were amazed at the gracious words that came from his mouth. They also asked, “Isn’t this the son of Joseph?”
He said to them, “Surely you will quote me this proverb, ‘Physician, cure yourself,’ and say, ‘Do here in your native place the things that we heard were done in Capernaum.’” And he said, “Amen, I say to you, no prophet is accepted in his own native place.
Indeed, I tell you, there were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah when the sky was closed for three and a half years and a severe famine spread over the entire land. It was to none of these that Elijah was sent, but only to a widow in Zarephath in the land of Sidon. Again, there were many lepers in Israel during the time of Elisha the prophet; yet not one of them was cleansed, but only Naaman the Syrian.”
When the people in the synagogue heard this, they were all filled with fury. They rose up, drove him out of the town, and led him to the brow of the hill on which their town had been built, to hurl him down headlong.
But Jesus passed through the midst of them and went away.
 
I think it’s interesting that the passage from Paul’s letter to the Corinthians is commonly read at wedding Masses. Paul is speaking about a Godly love while the love that binds a man and a woman in the intsitution of marriage is more worldly. I guess you could argue that a marriage is made in Heaven and thus the reading is wholly appropriate. I have always thought that it was a somewhat “taken out of context” reading. In general, I think all Christians have a tendency to do this. They take passages that alone will justify their position or opinion while ignoring the true meaning or intent of the passage within context. The more I read the Bible, the more I come to believe that it can only be understood when taken as a whole. It’s far more difficult than memorizing a few passages, but maybe that’s by design.
 
I think it’s interesting that the passage from Paul’s letter to the Corinthians is commonly read at wedding Masses. Paul is speaking about a Godly love while the love that binds a man and a woman in the intsitution of marriage is more worldly. I guess you could argue that a marriage is made in Heaven and thus the reading is wholly appropriate. I have always thought that it was a somewhat “taken out of context” reading.
I agree. That’s why prefer seeing the word “charity” used in this passage rather than love. Sometimes “charity” has to be explained as being more than alms-giving (though it includes that), but it is not as easy to conflate that word as it is with “love,” which in the modern mind is synonymous with romantic or married love, or with emotions in general.
In general, I think all Christians have a tendency to do this. They take passages that alone will justify their position or opinion while ignoring the true meaning or intent of the passage within context. The more I read the Bible, the more I come to believe that it can only be understood when taken as a whole. It’s far more difficult than memorizing a few passages, but maybe that’s by design.
Again, I agree. And, more importantly, that is how the Church herself reads the Scriptures, what they call “the analogy of faith” where you look at any given passage of Scripture in the light of the rest of Scripture, as well as Sacred Tradition and Magisterial teaching of the Church. It’s of a whole – the “whole enchilada” if you will. 🙂
 
As we we did last week, let’s use the commentary from this week’s Catholic Matters study aid as a base, with commentary from the Navarre in blue, and my own comments (if any) in green.

[21] **Today this Scripture . . . fulfilled: **He tells the congregation that these words of Isaiah are being fulfilled, that in other words, he himself was the promised Messiah.
The words being referred to (from last Sunday’s Gospel) are the words that Jesus read from the scroll of Isaiah:
*“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim release to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, [19] to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.” *
As noted in last week’s study, this was widely seen as a Messianic prophecy in the atmosphere of high expectancy that marked Jesus’ time. It was clear this was what John the Baptist and his followers were looking for, as we see later in Luke 7:18-23:
[18] The disciples of John (the Baptist) told him of all these things. [19] And John, calling to him two of his disciples, sent them to the Lord, saying, “Are You He who is to come, or shall we look for another?” [20] And when the men had come to Him, they said, “John the Baptist has sent us to You, saying, `Are You He who is to come, or shall we look for another?’” [21] In that hour He cured many of diseases and plagues and evil spirits, and on many that were blind He bestowed sight. [22] And He answered them, “Go and tell John what you have seen and heard: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, the poor have good news preached to them. [23] And blessed is he who takes no offense at Me.”

[22] all spoke well of him: His sincerity and eloquence appealed to them, they “wondered at his discourse.” **Is not this Joseph’s son?: **But very soon they began to change their minds, they remembered he was the son of Joseph, the carpenter. That, of course, was the common opinion of him in his native town. Neither Mary nor Joseph had revealed the secret known to them only.
**20-22. **Christ’s words in verse 21 show us the authenticity with which He preached and explained the Scriptures: “Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.” Jesus teaches that this prophecy, like the other main prophecies in the Old Testament, refers to Him and finds its fulfillment in Him (cf. Luke 24:44ff). Thus, the Old Testament can be rightly understood only in the light of the New—as the risen Christ showed the Apostles when He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures (cf. Luke 24:45), an understanding which the Holy Spirit perfected on the day of Pentecost (cf. Acts 2:4).
“Is this not the carpenter’s son?” may either be an exclamation of amazement, or a sarcastic jibe at Jesus’ (apparently) humble origins and station in life. Strictly speaking, there was no "caste system in ancient Israel, but the social classes were strictly delineated. A carpenter would be quite near the bottom of the social order.

[23] **Physician, heal yourself: **He has read their hearts, they could not possibly accept that a mere carpenter’s son was the promised Messiah. He anticipated their challenge: how can you heal us if you are ill yourself, that is to say—how can you be the Messiah, the Son of King David, when you are only a very ordinary man, like the rest of us? **Do here . . . in your own country: **They were about to challenge his claim to work miracles. He could fool the people of Capernaum, a town some thirty-five miles away but not his own neighbors. **We have heard you did: **The implication is that the talk of miracles, worked by him, was empty rumor. Let him prove himself now. They would not be taken in so easily, as they knew all about him!
Variations of this saying (“Physician, heal thyself”) have been found all over antiquity. One ancient Greek manuscript contained a remark made in a sarcastic context; “Physician, heal thy own diseased limb.”

[24] **No prophet is acceptable in his own country: **This was and still is a fairly universally accepted fact.

[25] But . . . I tell you: To show them that they were no better than their ancestors, he goes on to quote examples from the past, where prophets sent by God to the Chosen People were not listened to by the people, but that the Gentiles listened to them and were rewarded for so doing. (see 1 Kgs. 17 and 2 Kgs. 5 for these two incidents).

[26] **Elijah . . . but only to Zarephath: **Elijah worked a miracle to feed a Gentile widow during a three-and-a-half-year famine while many widows of Israel were given no such divine favor,
He also went on to raise her only son from the dead.

[27] and the prophet Elisha: Elisha, the successor of Elijah, healed Naaman, the Syrian leper, a Gentile, while there were hundreds of lepers in Israel left uncured. The reason was in both cases that the Israelites refused to believe that these men were prophets sent by God.

(continued below)
 
(continued from previous post)

[28] when they heard this . . . filled with wrath: The people in the synagogue understood what he meant. Because of their lack of faith they were rejecting him, and therefore he would bring the messianic blessings to the Gentiles. This to them was a gross insult. As the chosen people they alone had a claim to the Messiah.

[29] **They rose up . . . throw him down head-long: **They were so incensed that they decided, there and then, to put him to death by throwing him over a high cliff to which they led him,
**22-29. **At first the people of Nazareth listened readily to the wisdom of Jesus’ words. But they were very superficial; in their narrow-minded pride they felt hurt that Jesus, their fellow-townsman, had not worked in Nazareth the wonders He had worked elsewhere. They presume they have a special entitlement and they insolently demand that He perform miracles to satisfy their vanity, not to change their hearts. In view of their attitude, Jesus performs no miracle (His normal response to lack of faith: cf., for example, His meeting with Herod in Luke 23:7-11); He actually reproaches them, using two examples taken from the Old Testament (cf. 1 Kings 17:9 and 2 Kings 5:14), which show that one needs to be well-disposed if miracles are to lead to faith. His attitude so wounds their pride that they are ready to kill Him. This whole episode is a good lesson about understanding Jesus. We can understand Him only if we are humble and are genuinely resolved to make ourselves available to Him.
Like many prophets before him (including Jeremiah, whom we heard from in our First Reading) Jesus is physically attacked and his life threatened by those who did not want to hear his message.
The village of Nazareth was (and is) built on the brow of a hill overlooking the plain of Meggido (Armageddon in the Book of Revelation). You can find it on this map (click on the map to enlarge it; find Nazareth in yellow, and go south). The Plain of Meggido was the site of many an important ancient battle, including the one where one of the last kings of the Kingdom of Judah, Josiah was slain.

As noted above, Jeremiah began his role as a prophet at the young age of 19 during the reign of King Josiah, who was also a young man at the time. Josiah was one of the few kings of Judah that “walked in a way pleasing to the Lord.” (2 Kings 22–23). He tried to reform the kingdom, bringing back the study and observance of the Law, and threw out the idolators and sorcerers. With so many things in common, he and Jeremiah must have had a very positive relationship.

Josiah could not completely turn back God’s wrath from idolatrous Israel, however, and the time of it’s destruction eventually came. Josiah himself met an untimely death on the battlefield fighting the Egyptian Pharoah, Neco, on the plain of Meggido. You can read about it in 2 Kings 22–23 and 2 Chronicles 34–35.

Just as Josaih, the good king, was killed at Meggido, so angry villagers of Nazareth tried to kill the true Good King of Israel near that same place.

[30] **but passing through . . . he went away: **They had asked sarcastically for a miracle; he worked one but it was against themselves. He miraculously escaped from their clutches. “His hour had not yet come.”
**30. **Jesus does not take flight but withdraws majestically, leaving the crowd paralyzed. As on other occasions men do Him no harm; it was by God’s decree that He died on a cross (cf. John 18:32) when His hour had come.
I’ve often wondered how Jesus accomplished this or how it appeared. I imagine it was similar to his display of power when they tried to arrest him at Gethsemane:

So Judas got a band of soldiers and guards from the chief priests and the Pharisees and went there with lanterns, torches, and weapons. Jesus, knowing everything that was going to happen to him, went out and said to them, “Whom are you looking for?” They answered him, “Jesus the Nazorean.” He said to them, “I AM.” Judas his betrayer was also with them. When he said to them, “I AM,” they turned away and fell to the ground. (John 18:3-6)
 
Sorry! I forget to include the map link showing the location of Meggido on the previous post!

You can find it here (click on the map to enlarge it; find Nazareth in yellow, and go south).

The Plain of Meggido in the Jezreel Valley was, as mentioned, the scene of ancient battles. It was located on the Via Maris, the trade route of the so-called “fertile crescent” that led from Egypt in the south, to Mesapotamia in the east (and, leter, to Asia Minor and Europe). This was also the route many a conquering army travelled including, at one time or another, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the Medo-Persians, the Greeks under Alexander the Great and the Roman legions.
 
Finally, here are some questions for personal reflection and application taken from my Scripture study found in Post #1 and here:

What is Jesus saying through the proverb (verse 23)? Through the Elijah and Elisha stories? How does this relate to the prophetic statements in Luke 2:14, 2:32, and 3:6? In what way do these words of Jesus to the villagers in Nazareth strike a cord in your own heart?

Why do Jesus’ words to them turn the people’s amazement (verse 22) into anger (verses 28-29)? What might your reaction be to his words if they were directed toward you?

Elijah (1 Kings 17:1-16) and Elisha (2 Kings 5:1-14) performed miracles for Gentiles at a time and in a culture where it was frowned upon. Who are the “Gentiles” God desires you to care for? How might you do it?

Jesus was set aside from all time (see the First Reading) to be the Messiah, the anointed One of God (see verse 4:18; the word Messiah means “the anointed one,” as does the Greek word “Christ”). How are we also set apart by God from all time and for what purpose are we set apart?

Jesus’ neighbors reject him because he grew up among them (verses 22-24). How have you fared with evangelizing your relatives (or being evangelized by them)? How do you deal with the reactions?
 
Comparing this passage with the Gospel from last week and this week, can you see any parallels between the call of Jeremiah and that of Jesus? :confused:
How about: before I formed you in the womb I knew you.
And today: First they love Jesus, then a minute later they are furious and want to
kill Him. The same with Jeremiah.

No I do not understand the people who were suddenly furious and wanted to throw
Jesus off the cliff, and I don’t understand the people who wanted to kill Jeremiah.
They either believe they are receiving the word of God or not; which is it? It can’t
be both. It can’t be yes when it’s positive and no if it’s not favorable.
 
:hmmm: Here are some more questions for personal reflection on this reading:
  1. How do you think “the word of the Lord” came to Jeremiah: (a) Voice from the clouds? (b) Human-sounding voice? (c) Inner voice?
I think a human-sounding voice, what do you think?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top