Jesus Christ and the fig tree curse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anhphan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course mountains are not transported into the sea by words, and trees, even if transported in the sea, do not bear fruit there.
Jesus used those expressions to point something physically impossible.
But he was not speaking of physical things but of faith
 
If you and four friends of yours are hungry and someone invited you to dinner and showed you a wide menu and then didn’t serve nothing, you would be angry.

This is frustration that is finalised activity being stopped.

Frustration took Jesus and fellows.

But it was not frustration from no eating.
 
“Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.”
- Matthew 7:17
 
Why did He curse the fig tree although it was not the time for the tree to bear fruit?
It wasn’t the time for “figs” in general, for all the other trees had not yet put forth.

Yet, this single tree (symbol of Israel as a nation) had put forth leaves, which signified or proclaimed that it had already born fruit ahead of all the others, since a fig tree bears fruit, then leaves.

It was self-righteousness, as in Genesis, covered in Fig Leaves, but no fruit of the Spirit.
 
The lesson was not for Israel as a nation because they were not with Jesus on that spot.
The lesson was for the frustrated and angry and hungry disciples who heard Jesus speaking.

To them it meant that even if you are with Jesus on a journey, at once something very dreadful may happen to you from God.
 
I feel silly but I always felt bad for the fig tree
It didn’t seem to be the tree’s fault that it did not have any fruit. A tree cannot water or feed itself. Is it possible that the Bible is wrong and it is not true that Jesus actually cursed a fig tree?
 
The illustration of the tree-fig is repeated in the gospel and it is not by chance. It is a very important illustration,
 
I do believe it actually happened, just like the slaughter of the innocents that preceded Christ’s birth. I think God sometimes does things just to allow us to reflect on our own internal workings and see how we respond, so that we can grow and feel for deeply and become more whole.
 
God waters the trees with rain. That fig tree got plenty of water, hence why it grew leaves. That fig tree is a bad tree and a waste of space which could be better utilized by a tree that does bear good fruit. (Christianity vs the heathen religions)
 
Last edited:
The illustration of the tree-fig is repeated in the gospel and it is not by chance.
Instead of cursing a tree that is having problems, wouldn’t it be better to try and help it grow better? You could prune it down, cutting back the weak branches and water and fertilize it to help it out. Why go around cursing things that aren’t just right instead of trying to work to improve the situation?
 
Your same logic could be applied to pharaoh in Exodus.
Instead of hardening pharaohs heart, why didn’t God just force it to be soften?
And again it comes down to choice. Pharoah chose to ignore God and thus allowed his heart to harden to God. The barren fig tree chose to be lazy and not bear any fruit. The Pharisees of Israel chose to disobey and harden their hearts to God. All of them chose to disobey God. All of them were punished for it. As will we if we disobey God and harden our hearts to Him. It’s all apart of the free will our ever loving and longsuffering God gave us.
 
Last edited:
The barren fig tree chose to be lazy and not bear any fruit.
I don’t believe that a tree has free will. A tree does not have consciousness and is unable to choose when to be watered or when to be fertilized. I would help a weak tree to grow. I would not curse it.
 
As far as We Know a plant does not have the same free will that a human does. If anything plants have their own version of free will that only other plants will understand.
 
Last edited:
If anything plants have their own version of free will that only other plants will understand.
I don’t believe that plants are capable of understanding anything. They do not have a developed central nervous system. I don’t see why it would be wrong to prune a weak plant, give it water and fertilizer and help it grow. What is accomplished by cursing a weak plant?
 
What is accomplished by cursing a weak plant?
As has been explained above, the tree was cursed so that Jesus could provide an object lesson to His disciples. It was only a tree; it’s not like Jesus caused pain or distress to a sentient being.

D
 
I don’t see why it would be wrong to prune a weak plant, give it water and fertilizer and help it grow. What is accomplished by cursing a weak plant?
Christ was prophesying. The fig tree was a symbol for the leaders of Israel, the corrupt priests and officials. They made a hypocritical show of virtue but bore no fruit. A generation later the nation was destroyed by Rome.
Christ was uttering a prophesy by way of the fig tree.
 
Excerpted from St. John Chrysostom on Matthew (Homily 67)

And when He saw a fig tree in the way, He came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only. [Matthew 21:19] Another evangelist says, The time of figs was not yet; but if it was not time, how does the other evangelist say, He came, if haply He might find fruit thereon. Whence it is manifest that this belongs to the suspicion of His disciples, who were yet in a somewhat imperfect state. For indeed the evangelists in many places record the suspicions of the disciples.

Like as this then was their suspicion, so also was it too to suppose it was cursed for this cause, because of having no fruit. Wherefore then was it cursed? For the disciples’ sakes, that they might have confidence. For because everywhere He conferred benefits, but punished no man; and it was needful that He should afford them a demonstrative proof of His power to take vengeance also, that both the disciples might learn, and the Jews, that being able to blast them that crucify Him, of His own will He submits, and does not blast them; and it was not His will to show forth this upon men; upon the plant did He furnish the proof of His might in taking vengeance. But when unto places, or unto plants, or unto brutes, any such thing as this is done, be not curious, neither say, how was the fig-tree justly dried up, if it was not the time of figs; for this it is the utmost trifling to say; but behold the miracle, and admire and glorify the worker thereof.

Since in the case also of the swine that were drowned, many have said this, working out the argument of justice; but neither there should one give heed, for these again are brutes, even as that was a plant without life.

Wherefore then was the act invested with such an appearance, and with this plea for a curse? As I said, this was the disciple’s suspicion.

But if it was not yet time, vainly do some say the law is here meant. For the fruit of this was faith, and then was the time of this fruit, and it had indeed borne it; For already are the fields white to harvest, says He; and, I sent you to reap that whereon ye bestowed no labor.
  1. Not any therefore of these things does He here intimate, but it is what I said, He displays His power to punish, and this is shown by saying, The time was not yet, making it clear that of this special purpose He went, and not for hunger, but for His disciples’ sake, who indeed marveled exceedingly, although many miracles had been done greater; but, as I said, this was strange, for now first He showed forth His power to take vengeance. Wherefore not in any other, but in the moistest of all planted things did He work the miracle, so that hence also the miracle appeared greater.
And that you might learn, that for their sakes this was done, that He might train them to feel confidence, hear what He says afterwards. But what says He? You also shall do greater things, if you are willing to believe and to be confident in prayer. Do you see that all is done for their sake, so that they might not be afraid and tremble at plots against them?
 
As I said the lesson of the cursed tree couldn’t be for the unbelievers Israelites who were not present near the fig.

The lesson had to be to his disciples about something closely concerning them present near the tree.
 
In another time Jesus used an illustration of a tree not producing fruit and after 3 years of cure the gardener was obliged to cut it.
It was referred to the Israelites.
 
Why did He curse the fig tree although it was not the time for the tree to bear fruit?
This tree links back to the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden. That was a fig tree, because when Adam and eve realized they were naked they reached to the first available think the leaves of the fig tree they stood at. Second this was a sycamore fig tree the other common fig tree in Israel. This is the kind of tree Zacchaeus climbed.
The branches of this tree ultimately were made into the crosses for the two thieves. Jesus was the fruit on His cross the tree of life and the thieves hanged on the tree of Knowledge. In Hebrew the word for tree, beam, wood, stick, etc. was the same word.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top