L
LilyM
Guest
Of course the Romans crucified people all over the place. Think of Spartacus and his revolting slaves. And they did worse. And didn’t give a darn about what territory they were on when they did it.Very debatable.
What if I told you that God was setting up the Graco-Roman empire as his True Holy Land and Kingdom during the time of the Old Testament?
What If I told you that Jesus and the Centurion is really there to demonstrate that Jesus is of Rome, and that the Law and Sabbath was actually ‘alien’ to him (yes, ‘alien’ is what the Catechism calls the religion/worship of the old covenant meaning it was ‘alien’ to Christ. It DID point to Christ however and often type-shadowed the (authentic) Faith in Spirit and truth)
What if I told you theres additional correspondances of Pilot to the Rome, perserved until this day where Pilot speaks so fondly of Jesus. After all, a learned intilectual like Pilot wanted to know ‘what is truth?’
And why did was he named Jesus? Names like Jesus and Nicodemus arent native names like Herod and Judas Iscariot (things that make you go hmmmm).
Was Rome or Greece crucifying people out in the open in their homelands? No? Did you know crucifixion is based off the OT Law?
So who is Christ closer to considering all this? Someone of Rome, an Israelite?
I’d say he was ANYTHING BUT Judean - i mean come on… he had to leave just to leave just to save his life! - Both as Baby AND as adult! Thats why he dwelled and lived in Galilee and was referred to more than once as a Galilean (way up north near Lebanon and Syria). You know, the same Gallilee refered TWICE as ‘Galillee [land] of the GENTILES’.
well wait… EXEPT for Judas Iscariot - he was the ONLY Judean and his last name was named after a town in Judea.
So I certainly do NOT consider a closed possibility that he was of Rome in a certain capacity. What does ROMANS 1:7 say? TO ALL WHO ARE IN ROME. Some is Jesus Roman? Umm… in a general context YES he was in Rome and proves so back then and through history.
On thing he is NOT though, is King of the Judeans. His own did notmrecieve him and made that charge AGAINST HIM. They used it to mock him. Because he wasnt one of them.
Rome = Good (Romans 1:7)
Synagogue (Sindacyte) Of Satan = Bad
The good did not kill Jesus. The light doesn’t mix with dark like they want us to believe. Such modern teachings are from the Synagogue/Lodge - not the One Holy Catholic and Apostalistic Church of ROME amd her Kingdom (empire) of God.
The one thing the Romans did NOT do was - crucify Romans. Spartacus and his followers were not Romans but slaves. Jesus was not Roman either, hence Pilate trying to palm him off to Herod (who had governance over citizens of Galilee, of which Jesus was a resident). Herod had no jurisdiction over Romans at all.
Remember St Paul, who actually did have Roman citizenship? When Paul insisted on his rights as a Roman he was not, if memory serves, even sent to the local Roman governor for trial, but was sent direct to Rome. Romans were very particular as to who judged their own.