F
Fundamentalist
Guest
Is it possible that Jesus could have traveled to India? If so, how would that impact, if at all, our faith?
NO! He died on the Cross, was resurrected and then ascended into heaven. Anything else about this is sheer speculation about something that did not happen. Its like people who ask if Adam and Eve had not sinned would Jesus have come to us. Such speculation is a waste of time.Is it possible that Jesus could have traveled to India? If so, how would that impact, if at all, our faith?
Jesus did not travel to India during the 33 years He lived on earth – but the apostle St. Thomas went there and evangelized after Our Lord’s death.Is it possible that Jesus could have traveled to India? If so, how would that impact, if at all, our faith?
Is it possible? Sure. Jesus traveled, so he could’ve traveled to India. Is there any evidence he ever did? None at all. If he did, how would that impact our faith? Not at all.Is it possible that Jesus could have traveled to India? If so, how would that impact, if at all, our faith?
The first time I encountered this claim was in a book by Eric Von Daniken. The rest is history as they say. Here is a link for you:Is it possible that Jesus could have traveled to India? If so, how would that impact, if at all, our faith?
It is also possible that India travelled to Jesus. There was trade between Alexandria and India and also trade between Alexandria and Israel. Indian ideas could have passed along the trade routes as easily as Frankincense and Myrrh.Is it possible? Sure. Jesus traveled, so he could’ve traveled to India. Is there any evidence he ever did? None at all. If he did, how would that impact our faith? Not at all.
The first time I encountered this claim was in a book by Eric Von Daniken. The rest is history as they say.
Eric von Daniken also claimed that all of the advances in human civilization and various ancient structures such as Stonehenge and the Pyramids were the doing of aliens from Outer Space. (His theories have since been debunked.)
Perfectly acceptable for one who is *"clutching at an incomplete and inaccurate understanding of ‘the facts.’ *This has incredible impact on Christianity!
The thing is, with all the evidence that Jesus’ teachings share much more in common with certain aspects of Buddhism and Hinduism than his teachings share with Judaism, we really have to rethink the context of how to correctly interpret his message.
There is historical evidence of him having traveled to India during the “missing” 18 years. Without thoroughly researching these connections you simply can’t know the full cultural context of the message and therefore can’t discern the true meaning of the message.
Without that you are clutching at an incomplete and inaccurate understanding of “the facts”.
Cute. Saying it’s so doesn’t make it so.Perfectly acceptable for one who is *"clutching at an incomplete and inaccurate understanding of ‘the facts.’ *
Catholics do not have that problem!
There is no evidence of Jesus having travelled to India. That is a load of nonsense.This has incredible impact on Christianity!
The thing is, with all the evidence that Jesus’ teachings share much more in common with certain aspects of Buddhism and Hinduism than his teachings share with Judaism, we really have to rethink the context of how to correctly interpret his message.
There is historical evidence of him having traveled to India during the “missing” 18 years. Without thoroughly researching these connections you simply can’t know the full cultural context of the message and therefore can’t discern the true meaning of the message.
Without that you are clutching at an incomplete and inaccurate understanding of “the facts”.
Sorry, while there is no general consensus of the evidence definitively having proved Jesus travelled to India, to say no evidence exists is itself “a load of nonsense”.There is no evidence of Jesus having travelled to India. That is a load of nonsense.
No general consensus of evidence?? Of course not because there is no evidence at all. Jesus didn’t go to India.Sorry, while there is no general consensus of the evidence definitively having proved Jesus travelled to India, to say no evidence exists is itself “a load of nonsense”.
Is the possibility of Jesus having travelled in India that threatening to your world/religious view?
The accepted biblical writers left an 18 year gap in the life of Jesus. Are you that afraid that your understanding may have to change if we discover where he went and what he did during those years?
Is your current world/religious view more important and more sacred than what Jesus actually did for most of his sojourn on earth?
thistle,No general consensus of evidence?? Of course not because there is no evidence at all. Jesus didn’t go to India.
Nothing will threaten my Catholic beliefs which are unshakable. However, I see you can’t make up your mind what to believe, though.
My faith is strong but it seems that anyone who does not share your opinion must be wrong and have weak faith. Talk about judging someone you don’t even know!!thistle,
The thought of Jesus having gone to India is obviously threatening to your belief system by the nature of your responses.
Be careful of worshipping your beliefs in place of what those beliefs are supposed to point to - that would be idolatry.
Be careful of trusting in rigidity as a means of achieving unshakability - rigid things break, and an excessively rigid mind can result in mental breakdowns or even strokes. While our spiritual beliefs appear to be in irreconcilable contradiction, I would not wish those consequences on you.
Although I left the Catholic Church years ago and see no reason for me to ever return, that doesn’t mean I want to break the faith of any person who’s natural spiritual path lies there. I would however, encourage you to go much, much deeper into that faith - far beyond the superficial clinging to textually expressed beliefs.
Pray to find a Catholic spiritual director of the caliber of Padre Pio. Such a person could assist you in getting to a point spiritually you can’t even imagine today.
I’m responding to the textual content of your posts and describing what I see. That’s not a judgement of your soul - it’s an observation of your human communications.My faith is strong but it seems that anyone who does not share your opinion must be wrong and have weak faith. Talk about judging someone you don’t even know!!
Again you presume to know me but you don’t. Only God really knows me. Are you equating yourself to God?I’m responding to the textual content of your posts and describing what I see. That’s not a judgement of your soul - it’s an observation of your human communications.
If your faith were as strong as Padre Pio’s, your spiritual state would be similar to Padre Pio’s.
That’s the standard, thistle, not how vigorously you agree with textual Church doctrine.
That’s quite a mouthful of straw, Matey. Enough to build a strawman, in fact.Cute. Saying it’s so doesn’t make it so.
If you don’t care to know the complete context of Jesus’ teachings, you don’t really care about Jesus’ teachings. You only care about the system of belief you cling to.
Worshiping an incomplete system of belief is idolatry - not the physical picture or statue kind, but something much, much more insidious.