Jesus is not BMITS. TONUD is wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristinma
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
BillyT92679:
Your preaching to the wrong choir here. We believe the Catechism is orthodox and completely correct in all counts.
To which perhaps this quote from Francis A. Schaeffer is most apropos:
Francis A. Schaeffer:
. . . . The Orthodox Roman Catholic would tell me that I am bound for hell because I reject the true Church. He is dealing with a concept of absolute truth. But the new Roman Catholic who sits by my fireside says, ‘You are all right, Dr. Schaeffer, because you are so sincere.’ In the new Roman Cathlicism, such a statement usually means that the dialectical method has taken over. (p. 83, The God Who is There: Speaking Historic Christianity Into the Twentieth Century, Francis A. Schaeffer, 1968, Inter*-Varsity Press*, Chicago IL)
As for some of the other comments here:
40.png
Kristinma:
In fact almost every one you know and admire is either in hell or is destined for hell.
Almost the only Scriptural thing said here. Keep in mind that Hell is our birthright as wanton enemies of God, as lifelong, unrepentant, willful sinners. We have no claim on God whatsover. We have no right to His mercy. We have nothing by which we can demand anything or hold any power over Him. He is the Sovereign One. We are worms, wretches, filth in His eyes because we willfully reject Him. The astounding thing is that He loves us anyhow and deigns to save some for purposes of His own, without respect to merit or virtue in any of us. None of us have any merit or virtue by Divine standards. We are dead to Him already. Your first problem is in assuming that human goodness in some way measures up to God’s standards, that it imposes some sort of indebtedness on God which He must reward.
I’m not going to hell. I may be an arrogant SOB and the companies I control may treat their workers badly and defraud their customers, but I’m saved because I profess Jesus as my Lord and Saviour.

And you can be just like me.
With birth comes growth. With growth comes fruit. Some growth is not easily visible, just as some plants put down deep roots long before they produce stems, leaves, or blossoms. Mere profession with no fruit as evidence suggests no growth, which in turn suggests no birth. Regeneration is an exclusive work of God, and the affirmation of Christ as personal Lord and Savior is not of itself proof that God has acted in the heart and life of a soul. The SOB who also spends hours of his or her time doing some of the other things you clearly hold up as good things, who is working on his or her SOB-ness, who is involved in a process of change not through their own strength by the leading and the power of the Holy Ghost–SUCH a person may create scandal and offense by the fleshly works they still find themselves prey to, but they are saved by the Grace of God through genuine, God-given faith in Jesus Christ. One might want to be ‘just like’ the ‘arrogant SOB’ in one respect: insofar as he or she is becoming conformed to the image and likeness of Jesus Christ, so long as they are becoming in their own spirits, ‘just like Jesus’.
40.png
kristinma:
See, that doctor over there? He spent three years in Sudan saving the lives of persecuted Christians. He risked his own life to do it and endured terrible hardship. Well he’s also going to hell.

But I AM SAVED.

If you don’t like it, don’t blame me. It’s God’s law. God set it up this way. God is LOVE.
Does the good Doctor never sin? Never lie, never get angry, never willfully appropriate what is not rightfully his? Has he maintained such a state of perfection throughout his life? If not, he is in active rebellion against his creator. He is justly and condinely condemned for his own sins. His good works cannot atone for his wickedness, cannot give him at-one-ness with God. Only the grace of God through Jesus Christ can do that, but apparently the good Doctor has never thrown himself upon the mercy of the God Who Is There, has ignored whatever preaching of the Gospel he may ever have heard, has ignored the Light of Conscience given him by his Creator, has likewise ignored the Light of Creation. He either never merited the Light of Christ or rejected it.

If you don’t like it, don’t blame God. Blame the Doctor. He’s the one who decided to sin. He is the one who rejected his God. He is the one who is culpable.
 
40.png
JimG:
Without respect to BMITS and TONUD, the facts stated in your post #35 have enormous implications for near-term geopolitics.
Yes they do,

God bless,

Kristin
 
flameburns623

I can only give you the same answer I gave discipleofJesus.

We have stated our respective positions to the best of our ability. Perhaps we should now let the matter rest.

God bless you flameburns623,

Kristin
 
JimG

IN many ways Americans seem blissfully unaware of the way the world is changing around them.

Muslims are still a minority in Europe. But, in some European countries, the Muslim VOTE is becoming important. Within a decade the growing Muslim vote could become crucial to winning elections.

So there is already a strong and expanding Muslim influence on Government policy in many European countries.

To get a flavour of the situation here in the State of Victoria, Australia, follow these links.

onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3050

onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3674

God bless,

Kristin
 
The way I look at it is that the bible says “Judge not lest we be judged”. Who are we to say who will and won’t get into heaven?
I think God showed us the path that leads to heaven, and the one that leads to hell, and we should just try to the best of our ability to do what the Church teaches is the path to heaven. We should focus on our own fate, and not judge what everyone elses will be.
Jmho 🙂
 
40.png
kristinma:
flameburns623

I can only give you the same answer I gave discipleofJesus.

We have stated our respective positions to the best of our ability. Perhaps we should now let the matter rest.

God bless you flameburns623,

Kristin
Kristinma,
You opened this thread and yet now you are systematically stopping all discussion by telling respondants that they should now let the matter rest.

It seems to me that the numbers involved are meaningless. Perhaps most people will be saved, perhaps most will end up in hell. The Bible definitely seems to suggest that more will end up in hell than will be saved - see Our Lord’s references to wide path to destruction and the narrow path to heaven (Matthew 7:13-14). Our Lord actually says that those who find the path to salvation are few.

The point is that it is a tragedy if ONE person ends up in hell. However we don’t solve that problem by changing the requirements for salvation and making them easier. It is God who has told us what is required for salvation and if much of the modern world chooses to reject this then it is on their own heads. Too many people are today trying to tell God what He should do and what standards He should accept. When are we going to learn that God sets the rules, not us! He has made these rules abundantly clear in Scripture and through the teaching of His Church.

The normal way of salvation is through Christ. This is clear Biblical teaching and the clear teaching of the Church. Christ gave us His sacraments, beginning with baptism, as the channels of His grace. We are required to follow the path to heaven that Jesus has mapped out for us. As to what happens to thoses who do not follow this path we have to leave the judgement to God.
 
40.png
rjs1:
Kristinma,
You opened this thread and yet now you are systematically stopping all discussion by telling respondants that they should now let the matter rest.
Dear rjs1,

I can only repeat what I said earlier.

I have stated my position to the best of my ability. I believe it is in accordance with paragraphs 836 - 848 of the Catechism.

I do not agree with your reading of Matthew 7:13-14 nor do I think it accords with what is stated in the catechism.

There really is nothing more than I can say except to urge you to read ALL my posts on this topic – especially posts #9, #19, # 27 (Including the link to This Rock), and, ESPECIALLY post #34.

You may also want to read post #25 from “Lapsed.” “Lapsed” is now on his way to becoming ex-Lapsed.

There is nothing I can add to all that without repeating myself. If you find that what I wrote is not convincing then we have to agree to differ.

God bless you rjs1

Kristin
 
Humbled4Jesus (Nice nick)

Sorry for the delay in replying. I did not see your response.

On one level I agree with your post #46.

The problem I have is that so many people think evangelising means scaring people into loving Jesus!

Is that even possible?

God bless you Humbled4Jesus,

Kristin
 
40.png
kristinma:
Dear rjs1,

There really is nothing more than I can say except to urge you to read ALL my posts on this topic – especially posts #9, #19, # 27 (Including the link to This Rock), and, ESPECIALLY post #34.

Kristin
Dear Kristinma,

I read the link to This Rock (your post, # 27) and I totally agree with the article. I think it states the position very well. I don’t see how it contradicts anything I said. You said you do not agree with my reading of Matthew 7:13-14. I find this a bit puzzling because I did not do any real interpretting of Our Lord’s words - they speak for themselves. If Jesus says there is a wide path “to destruction”, a narrow path to “life” and that those who find the narrow path are “few”, then I don’t see how those words can be reinterpretted.
I would make the point that neither the Bible nor the Catholic Church teaches universal salvation. In fact the Church has repeatedly condemned that as a false doctrine. I would go further and say that not only is “universalism” contrary to Church teaching, it insults Our Lord’s words about those who are saved and those who are lost. “Universalism” basically is saying that Our Lord was either mistaken or lying when He talked about those who are going to go to Hell.
 
40.png
kristinma:
You may also want to read post #25 from “Lapsed.” “Lapsed” is now on his way to becoming ex-Lapsed.
ex-Lapsed? Sounds too much like a laxative. 😛

And I’m no longer on my way.
 
BillyT92679

Thank you for that link. It’s EXCELLENT – as was everything Cardinal Ratzinger wrote.

I really advise everyone who has posted in this thread to study it.

Rjs1

I really feel I’ve said all I can. We shall have to agree to differ.

Lapsed

You wrote:

“Sounds too much like a laxative”

You’ve got me there! No idea what you’re talking about. :confused:

Then you wrote:

“And I’m no longer on my way”

I have been praying to here that from you. I am so HAPPY for you.

If you don’t mind, please tell us how it all happened. 👍

God bless you BillyT92679, Rjs1 and Lapsed

Kristin
 
40.png
kristinma:
A number of denominations – among them various Christian fundamentalist groups in the US – promulgate the doctrine that only people who explicitly accept and proclaim Jesus as their Lord & Saviour are “saved.” Every one else is doomed.

Some will make allowances for people who never had an opportunity to hear the Gospel message – eg people belonging to lost tribes in the jungles of Sumatra. But by and large people in “Western” countries – people living in North and South America, Europe or Australasia – who do not proclaim Jesus as Lord & Saviour are doomed to eternal suffering in the fires of hell. So are most Muslims and Hindus.

I’ll call this the Theory Of Near Universal Damnation or TONUD. (Rhymes with “toe” and “bud.”) Under TONUD almost everyone is damned.

You see where TONUD leads? For a Jew, for example, it says most of the six million who died in Hitler’s concentration camps are now suffering an even worse fate at the hands of a “merciful” God. Meanwhile a concentration camp guard who repented before he died is now tasting the delights of heaven.

TONUD means that almost every Nobel Prize winning scientist of the last century is now in hell.

TONUD means that countless good people are now in hell while some real scumbags who wiggled their arms in the air and shouted “Lord, Lord” are in heaven.

TONUD paints a picture of a God as the Big Megalomaniac In The Sky (BMITS – rhymes with “bee” and “fits”). Better a God-free universe than one dominated by BMITS.

But here is the WORST of it. TONUD is not scriptural. That is not what the Bible says. Only by taking certain passages out of context and by ignoring large parts of holy scripture can you believe something like TONUD.

I don’t want to go into a long screed on what the Bible does say, but I’ll give ONE example that tends to counter TONUD.

(Mt 7:21-23)

21"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.

22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’

23Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

Creationism aside, TONUD has probably kept more people away from Jesus than any other false doctrine.

Jesus is NOT BMITS.

BMITS is not the God of the Bible.

TONUD is wrong.

Just had to get that off my chest.

God Bless

Kristin

A lot of Saints seem to have believed in TONUD. St. Thomas Aquinas teaches it, but not because he held to BMITS.​

He is almost a proto-hyper-Calvinist, except that he allows for human free will. To read some authors, one would think that the Lord had preached the good news of our damnation. What a “Gospel” ! That does exactly what Calvinism is accused of doing - it paralyses moral effort. ##
 
Originally Posted by kristinma
*
TONUD means that almost every Nobel Prize winning scientist of the last century is now in hell.
Kristin*
I could take issue with your argument on several points but this one point jumped out at me. Why do you make the assumption that Nobel prize winners are more entitled to Heaven than anyone else?
I, too, am curious as to what you are intending with this statement. Why would it be assumed that ANY scientist is destined for hell?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top