T
TexanKnight
Guest
the author is an lds apologist. not sure how helpful that is
the author is an lds apologist. not sure how helpful that is
Wow. Just wow. Other than the fact that I am a sinner, just like you, there is nothing “wrong” with me. Why do you always make it personal? It’s not your fault that you think this way because your prophets have told you there is something wrong with those who leave the LDS. It has nothing to do with the man behind the curtain!Something must be wrong with iepuras if she left the faith, because all is well in Zion! I am sorry.
Please re read what I wrote. You took it 180 from what I meant.Wow. Just wow. Other than the fact that I am a sinner, just like you, there is nothing “wrong” with me. Why do you always make it personal? It’s not your fault that you think this way because your prophets have told you there is something wrong with those who leave the LDS. It has nothing to do with the man behind the curtain!
Why would I read a book when you stated that critics of the LDS **here on CAF **have quoted these things???
bumpHi Tom - What are some thoughts and ideas of Joseph Smith that you place the most value on?
I think she was right on it. You said something must be wrong with her. How can she take it another way?Please re read what I wrote. You took it 180 from what I meant.
RIGHT AFTER you said…Something must be wrong with iepuras if she left the faith…
Hopefully just another circumstance of poor communication.…there is a tendency to want to assign less than flattering reasons upon the departures of people we know. This is often unfair and seldom charitable.
RIGHT AFTER you said…Again…you say this…
All,I can say that there is an unfortunate trait possessed by many of my co-religionist and myself. Believing the CoJCoLDS is true there is a tendency to want to assign less than flattering reasons upon the departures of people we know. This is often unfair and seldom charitable. It betrays our collective or individual insecurity. Something must be wrong with iepuras if she left the faith, because all is well in Zion! I am sorry.
Tom was being facetious. He wasn’t really saying there is anything wrong with you. He was illustrating how those LDS think.Wow. Just wow. Other than the fact that I am a sinner, just like you, there is nothing “wrong” with me. Why do you always make it personal? It’s not your fault that you think this way because your prophets have told you there is something wrong with those who leave the LDS. It has nothing to do with the man behind the curtain!
Welcome to the Catholic Church!!!I was a convert to the LDS Church. I left when it became clear that what I read about plural marriage and the Book of Mormon were white-washed church propaganda. Once I found out Joseph Smith was out marrying teens and the wives of his apostles it was hard for me to see that as the version given to me when I joined the LDS Church. I think the final straw was finding that mtDNA of Native Americans showed they didn’t have anything to do with ancient Israelites. I also read a book by B.H. Roberts about the Book of Mormon in which he asked a lot of questions he couldn’t get answered by the LDS apostles and prophets.
After going through a fairly lengthy period of evangelical Protestantism I wound up looking into the Catholic Church where many of my questions were answered. Of course we’ll always have questions on this side of eternity. I suspect most Mormons are going to qualify to go to heaven based on a baptism of desire, but that’s more of a hope than a fact. I’m just happy God brought me to the Catholic Church!
Ah, I see it now. Sorry…I had to re-read a few time to get what you saying. I usually pick up on this pretty completely, but in this case I completely missed it. No worries.So I want to know. If what I wrote is read with a little effort to believe I am not a monster, is it not obvious that I am offering an olive branch not a stick? If not, I have little hope that my genuine criticisms of the arguments made against my church will be heard.
Thank you TaylorF and PaulDupre!Ah, I see it now. Sorry…I had to re-read a few time to get what you saying. I usually pick up on this pretty completely, but in this case I completely missed it. No worries.
When I read your post, I thought it was charitable until the last sentence. If you had used an emoticon such as this oneTaylorf,
Yes, that was intended to be linked to the first part and sandwiched by “because all is well in Zion.” Thanks Taylorf.
Here is the full quote:
All,
I have read and re-read this and re-read this. If iepuras and Infinatemaximus read it and re-read it (and even read it after I claimed it meant precisely the opposite of what ierpuras initially thought it meant), I am not sure what I can do.
So I want to know. If what I wrote is read with a little effort to believe I am not a monster, is it not obvious that I am offering an olive branch not a stick? If not, I have little hope that my genuine criticisms of the arguments made against my church will be heard.
So, I do want to know. Please answer for me.
Charity, TOm
Thank you. I really didn’t mean to offend, sorry that I did.When I read your post, I thought it was charitable until the last sentence. If you had used an emoticon such as this oneor
, I would have gotten your real intent. Sarcasm does not come across well unless you are clear about it.
No hard feelings.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)How about you guess which anti-Mormon organizations and websites I frequented as part of my research. FAIR and FARMS/Maxwell Institute. I wanted to go straight to the apologetic, I mean, anti-Mormon source.
Why don’t you also guess where I first heard all those **** quotes from the Journal of Discourses that were taken out of context by critics of the LDS church. That’s right, BYU religion classes! Who knew that the BYU religion department is full of nasty anti-Mormons!
Here’s the thing. Many people who leave the LDS church get all their “anti-Mormon” information directly from LDS sources.