Jesus' Second Coming has taken place

  • Thread starter Thread starter paarsurrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You know what they say about opinions, and look like this guy’s got one of the biggest ones I’ve ever seen:rolleyes:

paar, like the others have said, if you can’t bring something supportive to the table then all you are doing is blowing hot air, it means nothing. You say that Jesue went to India, so tell me, what of the witnesses that were with him at his curcifixion? What of the witnesses that saw him after his crucifixion and were with him for 40 days? What of the witnesses that SAW him taken up into the clouds after the 40 days? These are eye witnesses paar, of the eye witnesses were the ones that recorded, in writing, these events. It wouldn’t be a problem if only a couple claimed to witness these events but that isn’t the case, there were hundreds that witnessed these things. In light of this, your opinion is about as creditable as booger up my nose.
Hi friend Sabbath Keeper!

I think there is no compulsion here, to believe in what I say. You may easily reject or refute if I am wrong. One has just to revive and refresh one’s hard earned faith and salvation on sound reasons and rational arguments. One should be free like a flying dove in the air.

Jesus could assert himself for his claims and reasons; he needed no Paul/s, in my opinion; **I love Jesus **for his wisdom. Jesus feared nobody except GodAllahYHWH whose humble servant Jesus was, in my opinion. I love the blessed Mary also.

Thanks
 
Hi friend Sabbath Keeper!

I think there is no compulsion here, to believe in what I say. You may easily reject or refute if I am wrong. One has just to revive and refresh one’s hard earned faith and salvation on sound reasons and rational arguments. One should be free like a flying dove in the air.

Jesus could assert himself for his claims and reasons; he needed no Paul/s, in my opinion; **I love Jesus **for his wisdom. Jesus feared nobody except GodAllahYHWH whose humble servant Jesus was, in my opinion. I love the blessed Mary also.

Thanks
And like a dove I will fly away for this thread for I find no intrinsic value in pursuing this rediculousness any further.
 
You know what they say about opinions, and look like this guy’s got one of the biggest ones I’ve ever seen:rolleyes:

paar, like the others have said, if you can’t bring something supportive to the table then all you are doing is blowing hot air, it means nothing. You say that Jesue went to India, so tell me, what of the witnesses that were with him at his curcifixion? What of the witnesses that saw him after his crucifixion and were with him for 40 days? What of the witnesses that SAW him taken up into the clouds after the 40 days? These are eye witnesses paar, of the eye witnesses were the ones that recorded, in writing, these events. It wouldn’t be a problem if only a couple claimed to witness these events but that isn’t the case, there were hundreds that witnessed these things. In light of this, your opinion is about as creditable as booger up my nose.
What of the written record of Jesus in India. Record dating back to 55 AD? Record by peoples who were were dis-interested in Jesus, and had no axe to grind?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top