Jesus's cry on the cross "Eli, Eli, Lema Sabachthani"

  • Thread starter Thread starter catholictiger
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

catholictiger

Guest
alright so I was reading BXVI Jesus of Nazareth amazon.com/Jesus-Nazareth-Entrance-Jerusalem-Resurrection/dp/1586175009/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1319592462&sr=8-2

please note this stuff isn’t my own work, or my own research, I am simply summarizing a part of the Pope’s book. (pages 213-216)

I was reading the part about Christ’s cry of abandonment on the cross, and one of the questions that come up when discussing this is that How can Jesus, who is God, feel any separation from God at all?

Now theologians have attempted to try and explain how God can have separation from God. How one of the person of the trinity, in this case the son, can feel separation from the father, if they are in union with each-other. (I know some ways theologians have tried but I’m not going to go into them) According to the pope these ideas have been approached “too narrowly individualistic” (p215.)

Then the pope offers his own version of why jesus said this on the cross.

[BIBLEDRB]Matthew 27:46[/BIBLEDRB]

Simple he is just praying Pslam 22 (Psalm 21 in Douay Rheims)

[BIBLEDRB]Psalm 21:1-5[/BIBLEDRB]

By Christ saying this prayer he is actually, according to augustine, praying as both the head and the body.

Christ prays as the head, “as the one who unites us all into a single common subject,” and as the body, “that is to say, all of our struggles . . . are present in his praying” The Pope also says that we are the ones praying this Psalm but in a new way “in the fellowship of Christ” and we “past, present and future are always united” with him.

All quoted material from page 215

That’s pretty much it in a nutshell. The Pope, in my opinion, really gives some light to this subject. For me as well he goes at this in a new way that I have never heard before. Its one of those things that while I may not be able to explain it great to others off the top of my head, or I could have never come up with this on my own. When I read it though it makes perfect sense to me.

I hope I did a sufficient Job explaining this, I don’t think I can do as good of as Job as the pope. I don’t want to just quote a few pages from his book, mainly because I know CAF doesn’t like us quoting large stuff of other people’s work.

I suggest you check it out yourself.

God Bless CTF
 
yeah I agree completely with the Pope’s analysis here but don’t assume its new haha. I think this explanation has been around for quite awhile.
 
yeah I agree completely with the Pope’s analysis here but don’t assume its new haha. I think this explanation has been around for quite awhile.
its the first time I’ve seen it

I think Augustine was one of the first to introduce it.
 
Smart man, that Pope.

I’m always amazed that the media and academia (and many young people) fawn over the pronouncements of various leaders of Asian religions and ignore the Christian theological tradition, which is unbelieveably rich, subtle, and deep. I have no doubt the leaders of other religions are good and thoughtful men, but in Pope Benedict, we have one of the greatest and most subtle minds, and one of the greatest teachers, the Church has ever produced.
 
I’m always amazed that the media and academia (and many young people) fawn over the pronouncements of various leaders of Asian religions and ignore the Christian theological tradition, which is unbelieveably rich, subtle, and deep.
JMJ

I completely agree, Mike, although I can’t say I’m incredibly surprised…the misimplementation of the reforms of Vatican II (NB: the reforms qua Vatican II are not wrong; how they were implemented in the West was incorrect) led to a terrible demystification of the Liturgy and everything Sacred. The up-and-coming generation recognizes the lack of mystery in our Christian culture, and they are trying to bring it back. We can all realize this: walk into the Dom in Koln, Germany, and your jaw drops in amazement; walk into St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome and your heart leaps with joy at the incredible beauty and sanctity of the place. Walk into a church built post-Vatican II, and it probably looks hideous (insofar as we are talking about objective beauty). Now, ultimately, the topic I’m mentioning goes beyond merely what is beautiful, for the well of mystery is so much deeper than just the external manifestation of beauty, regardless of its objective nature. If anyone’s interested in this, I highly recommend for reading:

Jean Corbon, The Wellspring of Worship

Corbon, a Lebanese priest who contributed in great part to the section of the Catechism on Prayer, magnificently draws the reader into a mystical dynamic of the Liturgy; it’s perfect for Liturgist and Lay alike!

God love you
 
Yes I agree with the Pope 🙂 My understanding is that basically Jesus immersed himself in that total spiritual darkness of our sins, or as Fr. Robert Barron puts it often, he reached all the total limits of God-forsakenness and filled them, hence he momentarily felt the complete weight of all ours sins and was blocked from God or felt that way…he took that on for us.

I remember in RCIA someone was bothered that Jesus had felt abandoned by God, like it somehow made Him less powerful. I feel exactly the opposite. How could He ever reach us and the most lost or wounded parts of us that feel God-forsaken, if He never had that experience himself? Basically no matter what I am dealing with I know he has been there, and this moment on the cross is a big reason why. He was fully human and fully God so he had to experience this human condition but he emptied himself like Paul said, and took on our sins since he was without sin.
 
By Christ saying this prayer he is actually, according to augustine, praying as both the head and the body.

Christ prays as the head, “as the one who unites us all into a single common subject,” and as the body, “that is to say, all of our struggles . . . are present in his praying” The Pope also says that we are the ones praying this Psalm but in a new way “in the fellowship of Christ” and we “past, present and future are always united” with him.
Nice. Thanks for the post.

It’s the same reason why Christ could be free from sin and yet still be baptized. It is the same reason why he can be led by the spirit into the wilderness for 40 days, to fast, to be hungry, and to be tempted by the devil. So that he could be “like us in all things but sin”, including in his bodily and spiritual suffering.

-Tim-
 
I think it is also that Christ by His perfect life earns for us the merit by which we may stand before God blameless. The “separation” on the Cross I think is a further extension of this. We will at times feel we are forsaken but Christ has sworn He is ever with us so in that same way we cry to a Savior who has been there before and strengthens us in our need with compassion rather than pity.

God Bless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top