P
Potter
Guest
Today I attended a lecture on Jewish history at a local synagogue. During the question/answer period, I asked what view modern Jews took of I and II Maccabees. He asked, “Isn’t that in the New Testament?”
The speaker was from a very Reform synagogue, but I was surprised by the answer. I know the non-Hebrew books of the Jewish scriptures were dropped from their ‘canon’, including the Maccabees, but even if they were not held as Scripture, I thought Jewish scholars and teachers might remain familiar with them…especially when giving a historical lecture that included a quarter-hour on the Maccabean revolt. (I thought maybe that Hanukkah ceremonies might include a reading of certain passages from the books!)
I don’t know how many persons of Jewish ancestry come to CA, or their level of observation, but how are the books of the ‘Apochrypha’ regarded, generally? Surely they aren’t so far removed from thought that they’re seen as solely part of the* Christian* tradition?
The speaker was from a very Reform synagogue, but I was surprised by the answer. I know the non-Hebrew books of the Jewish scriptures were dropped from their ‘canon’, including the Maccabees, but even if they were not held as Scripture, I thought Jewish scholars and teachers might remain familiar with them…especially when giving a historical lecture that included a quarter-hour on the Maccabean revolt. (I thought maybe that Hanukkah ceremonies might include a reading of certain passages from the books!)
I don’t know how many persons of Jewish ancestry come to CA, or their level of observation, but how are the books of the ‘Apochrypha’ regarded, generally? Surely they aren’t so far removed from thought that they’re seen as solely part of the* Christian* tradition?