John 1: 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim_Baur
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jim_Baur

Guest
KJV of John 1: 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

NAB of John 1: 4 through Him was life, and this life was the light of the human race.

Which is better?

How is it that they differ?

I would love to read any other information that one would care to share, thanks!

Jim Baur
 
KJV of John 1: 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

NAB of John 1: 4 through Him was life, and this life was the light of the human race.

Which is better?

How is it that they differ?

I would love to read any other information that one would care to share, thanks!

Jim Baur
This if from the Douay-Rheims

In him was life, and the life was the light of men

From the Haydock Bible Commentary

Ver. 4. In him: i.e. in this word, or Son of God, was life; because he gives life to every living creature. Or, as Maldonatus expounds it, because he is the author of grace, which is the spiritual life of our souls. — And the life was the light of men, whether we expound it of a rational soul and understanding, which he gives to all men; or of the spiritual life, and those lights of graces, which he gives to Christians. (Witham)

I would throw away the King James Version. It is not an approved Catholic edition. It is Protestant. The New American Bible is a terrible Catholic Edition. I suggest the Douay-Rheims. Reads like the King James Version, without any Protestant theology. In this case the KJV is more accurate than the NAB. Plus the NAB is using inclusive language ie. “human race”.
 
KJV of John 1: 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

NAB of John 1: 4 through Him was life, and this life was the light of the human race.

Which is better?

How is it that they differ?

I would love to read any other information that one would care to share, thanks!

Jim Baur
For an accurate rendition I suggest the Jerome Bible Commentary.

PAX DOMINI

Shalom Aleichem
 
For an accurate rendition I suggest the Jerome Bible Commentary.

PAX DOMINI

Shalom Aleichem
The “old” Jerome Bible Commentary or “new” Jerome Bible Commentary. The old has been out of print for years and the new is not accurate.
 
RSV-2CE; "In him was life, and the life was the light of men. " (Jn 1:4)

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, Ora pro Nobis Peccatoribus!

mark
 
KJV of John 1: 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

NAB of John 1: 4 through Him was life, and this life was the light of the human race.

Which is better?

How is it that they differ?

I would love to read any other information that one would care to share, thanks!

Jim Baur
I would chose ‘in’. The greek in 1:4 is ‘en’ > ‘in’ , whereas ‘through’ is usually translated from greek-‘dia’. ‘dia’ translates mostly to ‘by’ & ‘through’ . Of the 2800 greek 'en’s in GNT 37 times or ~1.3% of the time it gets translated to ‘through’ in KJV , whereas 67% for ‘in’ like in DRB. I don’t know what stats are like in NAB…only have KJV on computer and GNT

67% ‘en’ > ‘in’
1.3% ‘en’ > ‘through’
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top