E
Eucharisted
Guest
Coincidence or Divine Providence?As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.
Coincidence or Divine Providence?As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.
Coincidence.Coincidence or Divine Providence?
Tell your son that he is wise well beyond his years (at least, in this).I read this to my family and my 14 y/o son said there are no coincidences… or rather coincidence is God’s way of being anonymous… so we agree it is Divine Providence.
But the Divine Providence wasn’t there for 1200 years (which is when they added the chapter and verse to Scriptures).I read this to my family and my 14 y/o son said there are no coincidences… or rather coincidence is God’s way of being anonymous… so we agree it is Divine Providence.
But, God has foreknowledge.But the Divine Providence wasn’t there for 1200 years (which is when they added the chapter and verse to Scriptures).
It’s coincidence.
True, but not necessarily relevant. Man has his own agenda. Who’s to say the bishop who put the verses in didn’t have his own agenda.But, God has foreknowledge.![]()
I’m not sure - but I don’t think it was a Catholic bishop who first created the verse system as we know it in the bible. Anyone know?True, but not necessarily relevant. Man has his own agenda. Who’s to say the bishop who put the verses in didn’t have his own agenda.
I think you’re looking for something that is not there. But it is only my opinion.
The chapters were added in the 11th or 12th century. The verses were added a century later. Since the Reformation hadn’t happened yet…I’m not sure - but I don’t think it was a Catholic bishop who first created the verse system as we know it in the bible. Anyone know?
Blessings,
Brian
The coincidence implied is that the 6-66 verse is where Jesus’ disciples left Him over His teaching of the Eucharist.Coincidence with what ?
But, the chapters and verses are not part of the NT - no more than the commentary.Just to take a share in …
I believe that there is no place for coincidences in The NT.
I really appreciate the fact that you pointed out the real reason why the disciples left in verse 66, Tarek. It would be nice if some people reading would take a look at the whole story back to verse 26 (most significantly, though, verse 28), and notice (by the grace of God) that Jesus’ use of the phrases “eat my flesh” and “come to Me” and “believe in Me” all have the same meaning in the context. The funny thing is that not many people have noticed this fact and pointed out the reason for all the disciples’ leaving was because of the offense to their pride by telling them that they couldn’t even come on their own.Just to take a share in …
I believe that there is no place for coincidences in The NT. Jesus, indeed, knew what He was doing and had a specific purpose in mind (as Plain_me have said). That Jesus words and acts are (as in 2 Timothy 3:16) “useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness”. So, every chapter or paragraph or even every act is to help us to understand the Divine plan of our salvation.
Divine providence of course … but to teach us What? What The Lord wants us to learn?
The answer,I believe, is not so far . It is in Jhon 6:65.
I quote: " This is why I told you that no one come to me unless The Father has enabled him".
That there is no a “middle” place with our Lord. Or we come to him,or we leave him.
(Just a proposal:
May we share ideas about why many disciples have left Him after His say:" Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life …etc …)