John might have not witnessed Jesus on the Cross

  • Thread starter Thread starter paarsurrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

paarsurrey

Guest
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4861873&postcount=59
Mary did die and is buried
Originally Posted by josie L :
Just because Matthew didn’t mention it doesn’t mean John wasn’t there.
Hi friend josie L!
If you just think for a while; you would realize that John could’t be there.
It cannot be that Jesus uttered a senteces on the Cross and others would have forgotten to record it. If Jesus would have given Mary in charge of John for care in his absence; every body present must have remembered it. These were perhaps last words of Jesus on the Cross; if those who were present could afford to neglect it, then one may ask then, what was the purpose of their presence there. Was it just a scene to enjoy with? Impossible, in my opinion.
Why should have Jesus put Mary in the care of John, to start with?
If as our Catholic friends believe Catholic-god-Jesus was to come alive as soon he was dead on the Cross; logically he needed not to put Mary in anybody’s care. He would be himself there to take care of her. He could have even earlier sent Mary to heavens; if he was so much worried about her.
This also shows that Jesus did not died on Cross and he went alongwith Mary to India where he died a natural and peaceful death, as also his mother Mary.
You may think on these lines, if you may, no compulsion, please.
I love Jesus and John the Baptist; both born naturally and normally of their mothers; they both were equally Word of God, and of course Adam might be a Word of God also. This is what is described to be Word became flesh; all three persons mentioned above were Words became flesh, in my opinion.
 
Hi

I think John did not witness Jesus on the Cross.

I love Jesus and Mary as mentioned in Quran

Thanks
 
Hi

I think John did not witness Jesus on the Cross.

I love Jesus and Mary as mentioned in Quran

Thanks
Sorry, but for us the Quaran has no authority where it departs from what is said in Christian Scripture or tradition.
 
Originally Posted by paarsurrey:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost…3&postcount=59
Mary did die and is buried
Paarsurrey, would you stop opening new threads, and start focusing on the ones that you’ve already opened. Thank you.
Hi

Kindly mention the thread you want me to focus on which you think I have neglected. I might have frogotten one, of course to err is human; please do tell me for my more focusing, if you so may like. Please

My Catholic friends don’t have to believe in what I write here; I am just a man in the street, doing research for truth for my own salvation. If it is injurious to you faith and is not truth; you are under no compulsion to believe it , in my opinion.

I love Jesus and Mary as mentioned in Quran.

Thanks
 
Hi

Kindly mention the thread you want me to focus on which you think I have neglected. I might have frogotten one, of course te err is human; please do tell me for my more focusing, if you so may like. Please

My Catholic friends don’t have to believe in what I write; I am just a man in the street, doing research for truth for my own salvation. If it is injurious to you faith and is not truth; you are under no compulsion to believe it , in my opinion.

I love Jesus and Mary as mentioned in Quran.

Thanks
Paarsurrey, I am not afraid of the TRUTH, are You?

And in answer to your question, I would like if you kindly answered my post in full in the Mary died and was buried thread. Thank you.
 
I think John did not witness Jesus on the Cross.

Have you actually read the Gospel according to St. John? If you had, you would knot that St. John saw Jesus on the Cross.

I love Jesus and Mary as mentioned in Quran

I hope you love the Coranic “Jesus” and “Mary” enough to enjoy spending eternity in hell with them, because they are demons.
 
I think John saw Paarsurrey on the Cross, because “I and Jesus are one” 😃

I’ve heard pretty much every argument you can think of against the events presented in the Gospels, and this one which Paar is presenting is nothing new. It all boils down to ‘can the Gospels be trusted as historically accurate?’ Since most scholars believe so, I believe the Gospels can indeed be trusted. Since John is the one who wrote the Gospel, and he was at the crucifixion, and he had seen Jesus for three years, I believe it is not only rational but logical to say he would have witnessed Jesus, since he would have recognized him on the Cross. The only way he would have mistaken Jesus is if Jesus had a twin brother, or if someone looked exactly like Jesus, but since there is no mention of such a person either within or without the Gospel (indeed, his only existence seems to be in the imagination of those who wish to deny the crucifixion of Jesus), we can reasonably assume no such person existed. So we go back to the Gospels and find that, yes, John would have recognized his Master hanging on the Cross.
 
I’ve heard pretty much every argument you can think of against the events presented in the Gospels, and this one which Paar is presenting is nothing new. It all boils down to ‘can the Gospels be trusted as historically accurate?’ Since most scholars believe so, I believe the Gospels can indeed be trusted. Since John is the one who wrote the Gospel, and he was at the crucifixion, and he had seen Jesus for three years, I believe it is not only rational but logical to say he would have witnessed Jesus, since he would have recognized him on the Cross. The only way he would have mistaken Jesus is if Jesus had a twin brother, or if someone looked exactly like Jesus, but since there is no mention of such a person either within or without the Gospel (indeed, his only existence seems to be in the imagination of those who wish to deny the crucifixion of Jesus), we can reasonably assume no such person existed. So we go back to the Gospels and find that, yes, John would have recognized his Master hanging on the Cross.
Hi

And Matthew was perhaps colour blind or may be full blind that he could not see John at the foot of the cross, as some have, I think suggested here; while Jesus was there nailed down on the Cross and Mary was standing in agony nearby, in my opinion.

I think only a clever Paul would have thought of such an ingenious plan, that John had witnessed Jesus on the Cross; while others have fled away and could not see him, in my opinion.

I love Jesus and hence I will defend Jesus against strange intentions of Paul.

Thanks
 
John said that he was there. John 19:26 "When Jesus saw his mother and the desciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son.”

You have now OFFICIALLY called John a lier. Why do you persist in doing this? John said he was there IN HIS OWN WORDS and you say he is lying?
 
Hi

And Matthew was perhaps colour blind or may be full blind that he could not see John at the foot of the cross, as some have, I think suggested here; while Jesus was there nailed down on the Cross and Mary was standing in agony nearby, in my opinion.

I think only a clever Paul would have thought of such an ingenious plan, that John had witnessed Jesus on the Cross; while others have fled away and could not see him, in my opinion.

I love Jesus and hence I will defend Jesus against strange intentions of Paul.

Thanks
Paul didn’t convert until over 50 days after Jesus’ crucifixion (read Acts to read his conversion). So no it wasn’t a clever scheme. It might be your opinion, but it is still wrong.
 
John said that he was there. John 19:26 "When Jesus saw his mother and the desciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son.”

You have now OFFICIALLY called John a lier. Why do you persist in doing this? John said he was there IN HIS OWN WORDS and you say he is lying?
He officially called himself Jesus in the ‘I and Jesus are one’ thread. Clearly logic is his archenemy. 😃
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobbyS View Post
Sorry, but for us the Quaran has no authority where it departs from what is said in Christian Scripture or tradition.

I ditto that. God Bless!

Actually, I wish he’d just go away and quit poisoning a Christian board with his blasphemies.
 
John said that he was there. John 19:26 "When Jesus saw his mother and the desciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son.”

You have now OFFICIALLY called John a lier. Why do you persist in doing this? John said he was there IN HIS OWN WORDS and you say he is lying?
Hi friend ralphinal!
I don’t believe John ever said those words, in my opinion; it is some other guy writing on his behalf, in my opinion, as expressed by our brother in humanity Ben Masada. Have you not read his posts in this connection? I think you must have read his posts, in my opinion.

I love Jesus and Mary as mentioned in Quran.

Thanks
 
I don’t believe John ever said those words,

What a convenient approach to Biblical exegesis! Simply reject anything written in a long stable text that disagrees with your preconceived opinions.
 
parr May be I can help you :

Jesus did die on the croos

Mary is not buried

Jesus was NOT married

Jesus did NOT live 123 years

Mary and Jesus did not go to

John was at the croos

Jesus did NOT live at His crucifixion but He did come back in Three days,You can not believe what you read in your book so start reading the Bible and if you do not believe in hell,some day you may…Have a great day and may OUR Lord bless You this is just my opinion
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobbyS View Post
Sorry, but for us the Quaran has no authority where it departs from what is said in Christian Scripture or tradition.

I ditto that. God Bless!

Actually, I wish he’d just go away and quit poisoning a Christian board with his blasphemies.
Patience is a virtue. Don’t give up on Paarsurrey, he might yet become a Christian. God Bless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top