John Muir is Canceled. Whos's Next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
gam197:
So now it becomes a discussion about semantics.
Word usage has been in question for over two threads.

Shared and agreed upon word usage is important for the exchange of thoughts and ideas. Without it, two people may not understand each other. Even worse, they may misunderstand each other, both thinking they now share a position!

If you have any legal professionals or engineers in your life, ask them about this. For such people are sometimes occupational in a position in which they must pay close attention to word usage
You are the only one questioning word usage of the word canceled. You stated you have no problem with the word in prior posts. I think most posters of these forums understand how currently the word canceled is being used.
40.png
ThinkingSapien:
40.png
gam197:
You do not like the word cancel so much
I’ve got no problem with the word “cancel.”
Good to know
 
Last edited:
40.png
gam197:
You stated you have no problem with the word in prior posts.
How did you interpret that?
You told me so.
40.png
gam197:
You do not like the word cancel so much
I’ve got no problem with the word “cancel.”
and
40.png
gam197:
You are the only one questioning word usage of the word canceled
Being your primary interlocutor in this thread, that is one of many “onlys” that can be pointed out. 😁
🤔
 
Last edited:
You told me so. You are a st
I’m afraid I’m not in a position to know your mind. I cannot tell you what what your interpretation is. Solipsism has not been solved.

Oh well, since I don’t know and you are not telling there is no where to go.

Chao.
 
40.png
gam197:
You told me so. You are a st
I’m afraid I’m not in a position to know your mind. I cannot tell you what what your interpretation is. Solipsism has not been solved.

Oh well, since I don’t know and you are not telling there is no where to go.

Chao.
You seem to be a stickler on this word but I think I will leave that alone.
 
Last edited:
Well - President Carter also signed the legislation that restored US citizenship to - first - General Robert E Lee of the Confederate Army and then followed that up
with - second - restoring US citizenship to Confederate President Jefferson Davis a couple of years later … Why was that necessary to do in the 1970s? … that is not merely standing next to his states’s flag … that was a failure to use a “veto” pen if nothing else!

Under today’s standards [though I never understood why that was done - not then and not now] there should be blanket condemnation of that racist and hurtful insult to the African American community
 
Last edited:
though I never understood why that was done - not then and not now
I can’t say I was aware of it. I tried reading a bit just now on it, and i can’t get on the same page as the explanations for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top