rcn:
What exactly is the point of this proposed event?
Is it some sort of attempt to show “Feminine unity”? No, it can’t be that… feminism is a bad thing, after all.
Is it an opportunity to draw attention to one’s self? Convince me that it is not.
A way to demonstrate an independence from what the Church teaches? Remember, the church does not request this, and has not for many years.
Point 1: Feminism is not bad…radical feminism is bad. The Blessed Mother was the ultimate feminist, I would have to describe Jesus himself as a feminist…this is a matter of definition.
Point 2: Who cares about “feminine unity” as you say? This is more a social experiment which was born out of the outright hostility of some people here who have a problem with this particular personal devotion.
Point 3: Is this an opportunity to draw attention to ourselves? Well, as I wear a veil on a regular basis as do others at my parish
there’s really no attention. This is not about attention but again, about personal devotion. Would this same charge be made against those ladies (or men) who hold a rosary throughout daily Mass and never put it away, other than to wrap it around their wrists?
Point 4. A way to demonstrate against what the Church teaches? This is a ridiculous charge. The veil/headcovering of any sort is considered to be a personal devotion AS IS THE ROSARY. Although the Church does not REQUIRE the headcovering, neither does the Church PROHIBIT it…and according to the very well balanced pastor(s) at my parish, it is a personal devotion.
I actually approached my Pastor on this issue after suffering an attack and having been accused of disobedience to the Church. He stated only that it was not required but it is a personal devotion and entirely acceptable to wear one.
So how exactly is this a demonstration against what the Church teaches? There is your answer. I did submit myself to the authority of the Church and had Father asked me not to wear the veil, I would not do so.
As far as personal motivation…quite honestly none of us owe you an explanation as we are not required to justify our actions since they do not contradict Church teaching. If we were out there telling everyone that they need to be covered…well, that would be an issue.
You claim that this is not an attack yet the way you word your questions is actually demanding of an answer which may or may not be satisfactory to you. This, in essence, is a form of attack whether you realize it or not. The reality is that you are not in a position to deserve a “response” as to the internal motivation of each individual here. For some it is very deeply personal.
Charity, of course, assumes that someone is asking a question out of a desire to understand and so I have responded. If you will complete a search on this topic in general, you may find a cumulative response which could actually satifsy your desire to understand.
Please feel free to PM me as I think I have lead this thread off course and don’t want to carry on any debate here.
I apologize to the OP if I have done so.