R
reen12
Guest
[Post 1, of 2 opening posts]
Where are the parallels - between the Passover [and the Exodus],
and the liturgy of the Eucharist?
God delivers His people from bondage to the Egyptian pharaoh.
[Christ delivers us from original sin.]
God parts the waters, to save His people.
[Saving water is poured on those baptized, removing
‘original sin.’]
A lamb is slain, to provide the blood on the lintel, and His people are saved from death.
The lamb was eaten, to provide strength for the journey to come. [the Exodus],
at God’s command.
Jesus is the Lamb of God, and we are saved through the blood that He shed,
eating the ‘lamb of God,’ both flesh and blood, as part of this memorial meal,
at the command of Jesus. “This is My body, which will be given up for you.”
“This is My blood, which will be shed for you.”
Yet there is a problem. What - precisely, were we being saved “from?”
It was St. Paul - not Christ - who spoke of an original ‘sin’ - from which
we needed to be saved. No original sin - no second, individual exodus, required.
I have four questions.
1- The Temple was destroyed, in 70 CE. About 35 years after the death of Jesus,
and His resurrection - if testimony, to this effect, is accepted as fact.
Is this not too co-incidental, to be discounted? - in terms of a new Passover
having been instituted. With Jesus as the lamb Who was slain?
2 -How address the two psalms, quoted by Christians - to bolster a claim of
much earlier ‘knowledge’ - of original sin? [Catholic scriptures numeration:]
Psalm 51: 7
Psalm 88: 16
Questions 3 and 4 in post # 2
reen12
Where are the parallels - between the Passover [and the Exodus],
and the liturgy of the Eucharist?
God delivers His people from bondage to the Egyptian pharaoh.
[Christ delivers us from original sin.]
God parts the waters, to save His people.
[Saving water is poured on those baptized, removing
‘original sin.’]
A lamb is slain, to provide the blood on the lintel, and His people are saved from death.
The lamb was eaten, to provide strength for the journey to come. [the Exodus],
at God’s command.
Jesus is the Lamb of God, and we are saved through the blood that He shed,
eating the ‘lamb of God,’ both flesh and blood, as part of this memorial meal,
at the command of Jesus. “This is My body, which will be given up for you.”
“This is My blood, which will be shed for you.”
Yet there is a problem. What - precisely, were we being saved “from?”
It was St. Paul - not Christ - who spoke of an original ‘sin’ - from which
we needed to be saved. No original sin - no second, individual exodus, required.
I have four questions.
1- The Temple was destroyed, in 70 CE. About 35 years after the death of Jesus,
and His resurrection - if testimony, to this effect, is accepted as fact.
Is this not too co-incidental, to be discounted? - in terms of a new Passover
having been instituted. With Jesus as the lamb Who was slain?
2 -How address the two psalms, quoted by Christians - to bolster a claim of
much earlier ‘knowledge’ - of original sin? [Catholic scriptures numeration:]
Psalm 51: 7
Psalm 88: 16
Questions 3 and 4 in post # 2
reen12