Just Bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter boog123
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Physical things require physical tools. Spiritual things require spiritual tools.

For spiritual practices, one can practice them in the spirit. IOW, one does not require a physical object for a spiritual practice. (To survive in the wild, one does require a knife, or the raw materials from which a tool with a cutting edge can be constructed.)

From the Bible, one can learn what the appropriate spiritual practices are. The biggest issue is going to be be starting and maintaining the practices.

The gear to use and the training on using it can be found in the Bible. Whether or not one will recognize them, is a different issue.

Why isn’t everybody who claims to be Roman Catholic a practicing member of Opus Dei? There is no rational reason for the existence of any other body within Roman Catholicism. *

Multiple understandings. One major issue with spirituality, is that there is no way to determine spiritual validity, until after the fact.

xan

jonathon*

Ah, but I am talking about spiritual tools, too. The sacraments, for all of their physical parts, are spiritual tools. They are outward signs of inward changes of grace. If you feel that the sacraments are not Biblical, then you should be able to show the creation of them later on.

Why have multiple groups, like Opus Dei? Different focii on the journey. Some see helping the poor as their main concern, while others see tending to the sick. It is just a diffence of duty. Opus Dei has as its primary focus the laity.

Multiple understandings? Then the Klan may be Christian, we won’t know until the other side? Homosexual unions may be acceptable? The concept that Jesus is a stp above an angel and not really God? No, there is Truth and there is not Truth.
 
jmcrae;:
What makes you think that “foundlings” can’t become Catholic? 🤷
Since the priest that christened an ex-girlfriend said that she could neither be confirmed, nor go through RIAA. (I’ve seen both her Christening Certificate, and the letter the Bishop wrote sustaining the Priest’s refusal to either confirm her, or allow her to go through RIAA. )

xan

jonathon
 
Since the priest that christened an ex-girlfriend said that she could neither be confirmed, nor go through RIAA. (I’ve seen both her Christening Certificate, and the letter the Bishop wrote sustaining the Priest’s refusal to either confirm her, or allow her to go through RIAA. )

xan

jonathon
There is something missing in this story. I know of no reason the Church would refuse someone a sacrament. There are times that it may be delayed until a matter is resolved, or there may be an impediment, but I know of no reason to deny someone RCIA or Confirmation. What was the basis of the denial? If you would like, for personal reasons, feel free to send it to me privately.
 
ralphinal;:
The sacraments, for all of their physical parts, are spiritual tools.
One learns about the Sacraments and how to utilize them from studying the Bible.
Multiple understandings? Then the Klan may be Christian, we won’t know until the other side? Homosexual unions may be acceptable?
The KKK pretty clearly violated both Old Testament and New Testament commandments.

If you meant apartheid, rather than the KKK, then Philemon tends to argue against the theology that supports Apartheid. (The theological justification for Apartheid was initially worked out by the Roman Catholic Church.)(As an aside, I’ll point out that for all of the evils of Apartheid, the most oppressive group were the liberal English speaking whites — the group that did not cite the Bible as its justification of its policies.)

As far as homosexual unions go, there is documented evidence that they have been performed by that extremely uninfluential, and insignificant priest: the Bishop of Rome.
No, there is Truth and there is not Truth.
And as I wrote earlier. The only way one can ascertain the objective truth in spiritual matters is after the fact. Prior to that there is nothing but subjective truth.

There is no difference between a statement being proclaimed by one person, or ten billion people. The proclamation won’t make it an objective fact.

What one can do, is start with axioms, and apply methods of logic to them.

xan

jonathon
 
As far as homosexual unions go, there is documented evidence that they have been performed by that extremely uninfluential, and insignificant priest: the Bishop of Rome.
Say what now?
 
ralphinal;:
There is something missing in this story.
If there was no paper trail, I’d agree that something must be missing. However, there is a documented paper trail that supports her story.
What was the basis of the denial?
The sole basis for the denial was the fact that she was a foundling.

The other case I know of, was of a male who was of illegitimate birth.

xan

jonathon
 
If there was no paper trail, I’d agree that something must be missing. However, there is a documented paper trail that supports her story.

The sole basis for the denial was the fact that she was a foundling.

The other case I know of, was of a male who was of illegitimate birth.

xan

jonathon
This is a new one on me, and I teach a Confirmation Class. I’ll do some research.
 
to answer your concern ralpinal,

ralphinal;
You claim that the Bible is the only spiritual survival guide that you need. I say like any survival guide, you got to have the gear, man.
I agree with jd below.

and God did give us gear to wear…the armour of God.

Just curious as to when the last time you were encouraged to wear the armour of God.?

Thank you Jdblake
Physical things require physical tools. Spiritual things require spiritual tools.

For spiritual practices, one can practice them in the spirit. IOW, one does not require a physical object for a spiritual practice. (To survive in the wild, one does require a knife, or the raw materials from which a tool with a cutting edge can be constructed.)
From the Bible, one can learn what the appropriate spiritual practices are. The biggest issue is going to be be starting and maintaining the practices.
The gear to use and the training on using it can be found in the Bible. Whether or not one will recognize them, is a different issue.
 
Why would Jesus tell his apostles to go out and teach then? Why not tell them go go write this down and distribute the books and let people decide for themselves?
 
to answer your concern ralpinal,

ralphinal;

I agree with jd below.

and God did give us gear to wear…the armour of God.

Just curious as to when the last time you were encouraged to wear the armour of God.?

Thank you Jdblake
And as I asked before, if there is One God, One Holy Spirit to guide us, one Scripture, why not One Chruch? Why are there so many with divergent doctrine? How can I tell what is right? Gamble and hope for the best?

As far as the Armour of God goes, we talked about that last week in a young adults group that I am in. Studying Paul’s writings. Oh, by the way, what did Jesus give us as a guide? What spiritual tools to Christ himself leave us?
 
And as I asked before, if there is One God, One Holy Spirit to guide us, one Scripture, why not One Chruch? Why are there so many with divergent doctrine? How can I tell what is right? Gamble and hope for the best?
for the answer to that question…

justforcatholics.org/a178.htm
As far as the Armour of God goes, we talked about that last week in a young adults group that I am in.
ralphinal;3120099:
I am glad to hear. Then you realize that from

Ephesians 6…
12For we wrestle
not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

That is our enemy

truth
 
As far as homosexual unions go, there is documented evidence that they have been performed by that extremely uninfluential, and insignificant priest: the Bishop of Rome.
If so, then you ought to cite it, or else quit repeating this slander.
 
Is it possible to just follow the bible? why does someone have to be a catholic or part of any other denomination? for the record i believe that catholics and pretty much all other denominations do good things and have good intentions but i’ve never seen a fact put in front of me that says catholicism is the true way to God, maybe if you can show me some proof?

THANKS
We do not have to be anything but biblical. If we follow the Bible and the Bible alone we will know how to live a life pleasing to God and how to be saved.
 
The Church that has St. Peter for its Chief Shepherd. (Often referred to today as the Roman Catholic Church.) 😃

The Sacraments!! 👍

(Do I get a gold sticker, Teacher? 😛 )
A couple of them… To me it is logic. Why would Jesus not give us more than a collection of teachings that can be interpreted a million ways? He gave us teachers and spiritual tools as well as the book. Paul tells us there are three enemies of the soul: the world, the flesh, and the Devil. Christ have given us ways to deal with each as we deal with each other.

Let us look at Moses and the trek through the wilderness. The Children of Isreal had guides who tried to teach them, provisions provided by God, and they had God’s promises to rely on.

Why would our spiritual journey though our lives not include guides, food, and Scriptures as well?
 
JMMK;:
Why would Jesus tell his apostles to go out and teach then?
In the only epistle that is attributed to Jesus, He states that He will send someone in his stead, at a later point in time. It implies that others have written his message, but His Message is not yet complete.

xan

jonathon
 
jmcrae;:
So then you ought to cite it.
In 1578, 13 such couples were married by the Bishop of Rome at St John Lateran.

Jacques Goar includes several such ceremonies in his prayer books. (Died 1658)

Office of Same Sex Union is a 10th century Orthodox Rite.

Order for Uniting Two men is a 12th century Catholic Rite.

Order for Solemnisation of Same Sex Union is a 13th Orthodox Rite.

Office of the Same Sex Union is 14th Century Serbian Catholic Rite.

Gerald of Wales records several such ceremonies taking place in Ireland, in his chronicles.(Early 13th century)

There are also the drawing of the wedding of Emperor Basil 1 and John A priest is depicted as performing the ceremony. (late 9th century)

xan

jonathon
 
The ones you added were not approved of by the Roman Catholic Church and mainly the Protestant of Orthrodox. The Bishop of the Roman Catholic Church for the time you mentioned as the Bishop of Rome was in France at the time.

Even if a Priest,Bishop, Pope were to complete such a union it would not be a marriage as you even stated unions not marriages.

2nd a man may make an err or sin as a priest to a pope but the Catholic Church is infoulable and as such will correct and recorrect any areas not coming from the Church founded by Christ.
 
c659smith;:
The ones you added were not approved of by the Roman Catholic Church and mainly the Protestant of Orthodox.
1578: That is the first time I’ve seen somebody describe the Bishop of Rome as a Protestant!

Jaques Goar: Dominican Priest. Appointed vicar provincial in 1652. Specialized in the study of Orthodox Rituals, so that they may be harmonized with Catholic rituals.

Serbian Catholic: This was a state church under the Bishop of Rome.

12th Century Catholic Rite: Maybe you can explain how this gets to be either an Orthodox or Protestant rite.

10th Century Orthodox Rite: This was during the debates prior to the Great Schism.

13th Century Orthodox Rite: This one can be called Orthodox Christian.

Gerald of Wales: Around 1200 AD he argued why he should be Bishop of St David’s with the Pope as judge. Opposing him was the Archbishop of Canterbury who had opposed both his first and second elevations to Bishop of St David, on political grounds. (The Archbishop considered an honest Bishop would reflect badly on the Church.) You might be able to argue he was Welsh Catholic, because it was a quasi-state Church.

Basil 1’s wedding was well before the Great Schism. If you want to deny that he was Catholic, then what was he?
it would not be a marriage as you even stated unions not marriages.
There is no substantial difference between the form and celebration of those rituals, and the marriage rituals from the same point in time.

xan

jonathon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top