T
tuffsmurf
Guest
If it is doctrine, how can it change?Just to correct the wording:
It’s the just war doctrine, not the* just war theory*.
If it is doctrine, how can it change?Just to correct the wording:
It’s the just war doctrine, not the* just war theory*.
Thanks for posting that list.Just to correct the wording:
It’s the just war doctrine, not the* just war theory*.
Good question.If it is doctrine, how can it change?
Yes, there are those who can play games with language and frustrate God’s will.Thanks for posting that list.
Personally, some of those reasons are fairly suspicious, seems to greatly benefit the secular authority, many of them can also be very relative too and could vary depending on an individuals definition of ‘threat’ or security.
Do you think the just war theory will be opposed by Francis, or just the language revised?We will always have the concept of a “just war” in defense. Tis a fallen world and terrible things happen and there will always be the need to oppose such -even with force at times.
I think you are correct: doctrine cannot change but it can be developed. Presently, the only just wars are wars of defense, not aggression. And the criteria I think are prudential and closely related to the teachings on “just” homicide in self-defense. The parallelism seems baked-in based on principles that I don’t believe will ever change.If it is doctrine, how can it change?
No.Do you think the just war theory will be opposed by Francis ?