A
Absalom
Guest
I had a discussion with my wife (an ex-protestant) about justification and salvation yesterday. She told me some things about her former beliefs that boggled my mind at first, but then began to make total sense (from a protestant perspective, that is). She said that, as she understood it, protestants believed that you could be saved without being justified. Is this true? If so, then this clears a few things up for me.
It seems to me that the bible teaches that we are saved when we die justified. Now, I’ve noticed that modern protestant discussions of faith/works use such language as “we are saved by faith alone” and “we’re not *saved *by works.” However, Martin Luther’s thing was that we were “*justified *by faith alone,” not “saved by faith alone.” This would explain a couple of things. First, Luther disliked James and wanted to remove it (because he understood that it disproved his theory). Secondly, it makes sense that modern protestants would separate justification and salvation (so that they can make *James *jive with the doctrine of Sola Fide). I’ve always wondered how protestants could say that we are saved by faith alone when James 2:24 makes it abundantly clear that we are not (in fact, it’s the only place in the Bible where the phrase “faith alone” appears). That’s because I’ve always understood that if one dies justified then one goes to heaven; and, consequently, if one died unjustified, then one does not go to heaven (“Nothing unclean will enter it”). But if prots. separate justification from salvation and say that one can be saved without being justified, and being justified is just a nice thing if you can get around to it, then it all makes sense. It seems like the protestants realized that Luther didn’t have his ducks in a row and so decided that justification wasn’t actually necessary for salvation, which allowed them to keep Sola Scriptura.
Can anyone add to this (or show me how I’m wrong)?
God bless.
It seems to me that the bible teaches that we are saved when we die justified. Now, I’ve noticed that modern protestant discussions of faith/works use such language as “we are saved by faith alone” and “we’re not *saved *by works.” However, Martin Luther’s thing was that we were “*justified *by faith alone,” not “saved by faith alone.” This would explain a couple of things. First, Luther disliked James and wanted to remove it (because he understood that it disproved his theory). Secondly, it makes sense that modern protestants would separate justification and salvation (so that they can make *James *jive with the doctrine of Sola Fide). I’ve always wondered how protestants could say that we are saved by faith alone when James 2:24 makes it abundantly clear that we are not (in fact, it’s the only place in the Bible where the phrase “faith alone” appears). That’s because I’ve always understood that if one dies justified then one goes to heaven; and, consequently, if one died unjustified, then one does not go to heaven (“Nothing unclean will enter it”). But if prots. separate justification from salvation and say that one can be saved without being justified, and being justified is just a nice thing if you can get around to it, then it all makes sense. It seems like the protestants realized that Luther didn’t have his ducks in a row and so decided that justification wasn’t actually necessary for salvation, which allowed them to keep Sola Scriptura.
Can anyone add to this (or show me how I’m wrong)?
God bless.