Justification?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJPJ
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DJPJ

Guest
I’ve read in a few different places that people claim the Vulgate mistranslates the term justification which resulted in the Catholic view of infused righteousness verse the supposed “true” translation which sets the stage for the Protestant view of justification. I was just wondering if anyone had heard of this before and had and a response.
 
I’ve read in a few different places that people claim the Vulgate mistranslates the term justification which resulted in the Catholic view of infused righteousness verse the supposed “true” translation which sets the stage for the Protestant view of justification. I was just wondering if anyone had heard of this before and had and a response.
I have heard of that and it was in the article you cited. I found a response to it in the book “Not by faith alone” Robert Sungenis…

“McGrath’s linguistic analysis and conclusion appear to read into history what his theology dictates. Despite the anomalies that always occur in translating a word from one language to another, it is a matter of certain faith that inspired Scripture, which translates Hebrew text into Greek text, cannot err, and does not envision the problem McGrath proposes. First, without reservation, the New Testament authors use the *dikaioo *cognates to translate the Hebrew Septuagint cognates. These translations occur in many non-justifyication contexts (i.e., “non-imputation” contexts). For example, in 2 Cor. 9:9 Paul cites a quotation from Psalm 112:9 and uses the Greek dikaiosome to translate the Hebrew faminine noun tsadaqah—(hich the LXX also translates as dikaiosune). The context of 2 Cor 9:9-10 concerns liberal giving, both of God and men, to those in need. Thus, contrary to McGrath’s thesis, dikaiosune is understood as that which is inherent within both God and man due to the good they have done. Similarly, Hebrews 1:9 uses dikaiosune to translate the Hebrew male noun tsadaq in Psalm 45:7 (of which the LXX uses dikaiosune) and speaks of the inherent righteousness of Christ. (The relevance of the LXX may be even more significant here since Hebrews 1:6 is quoted by Paul directly from the LXX). In addition, 1 Peter 3:12 regards righteous individuals as inherently righteous, for it is they who “turn from evil and do good” and “seek peace and pursue it.” Similarly, Hebrews 11:7 uses dikaiosune to describe the righteousness of Noah, translating the Hebrew adjective tsadeek in Genesis 7:1 which refers to God seeing Noah as inherently righteous for his goodness in the midst of the wicked people of his day.
We should also add that Scripture does not support McGrath’s assessment of the Greek word axioo to refer only to the estimation of an individual rather than his merit (which he distiguishes from the Latin notion of merit that gives the individual the “right” of the third party estimation, i.e., because he is deserving of it). The New Testament uses axioo not only in considering someone worthy but also in recognizing someone worthy because he is actually worthy. For example, Hebrews 3:3 uses axioo in reference to Christ’s worthiness: “Jesus has been counted worthy of greater honor than Moses…” This is a common usage of axioo and its cognates in the New Testament (cf., 1 Thes 1:11; 1 Tim 5:17; Col 1:10; et al).” (Not by faith alone, Queenship publishing,Sungenis page 61,1996)
 
I’ve read in a few different places that people claim the Vulgate mistranslates the term justification which resulted in the Catholic view of infused righteousness verse the supposed “true” translation which sets the stage for the Protestant view of justification. I was just wondering if anyone had heard of this before and had and a response.
“The second example is that of Abraham. God promised Abraham that his seed would be as innumerable as the stars and the sand of the sea. Abraham believed God’s word, and God counted this toward Abraham as righteousness (Genesis 15:1-6). Abraham did no righteous act but was considered righteous because he entered into a relationship with God based on his trust in God’s word.”
apostolic.net/biblicalstudies/justsanct.htm
Abraham being justified in Gen 15:6 is the classic Protestant argument of how they say justification in Scripture is punctiliar (that it happens ONLY once for all) and not a process. However, Scripture says something entirely different from the Protestant position. Abraham, according to this article by Jason Dulle is justified once (and for all) in Gen 15:6 because this is the moment he believed in God and became justified. The problem with Dulles position starts in Hebrews 11:8 where it says… “By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place that he was to receive as an inheritance; he went out, not knowing where he was to go.”

Hebrews 11:8 is quoting Gen 12 where God first commanded Abraham to leave Haran and go to Canan. Notice the obvious, that Gen 12 is before Gen 15 for they are in chronological order and since that is the case, the next question is…what kind of faith does Abraham have in Gen 12 that Hebrews 11:8 is speaking about?
Was it a true saving faith? Well it appears so since he obeyed God by faith and works and did what God wanted him to do.

Again, is the faith Abraham had in Gen 12 not a true believing faith? The answer is YES.
Abraham believed and obeyed by his actions (works) in Gen 12 and was justified at that time and then in Gen 15 he also believed and continued to be righteous/justified before God and in Gen 17 where Abram became Abraham he again obeyed God (as he did in Gen 12,15) and thus continue to be justified by his obedience (works) that God gave him to do.

So the whole point here in Hebrew 11:8 and Gen 12-17 is that Abraham is a clear example of how salvation (justification) is a process by which we have faith in God and obey Him by doing good works. This fits precisely with James 2 which says Abraham was justified by his faith and works. Note when Catholicism uses the word “works” in conjunction with faith it does NOT mean personal works, but the works done under Gods grace through love as Gal 5:6 says… “For in Christ Jesus, neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.”

The article you cited has many more errors that I could point out but its not right now worth my time to do that. I hope that helps 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top