JW - Jehovah's Witnesses - Organized To Share The Good News

  • Thread starter Thread starter BibleSteve
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If that’s the good news, I shudder to think what’s the bad.
The problem with JWs is you can not nail them on something because it’s a moving target. It is one think for us Orthodox and Latins to argue what a Father says in the 2nd century, it 's another thing to argue with someone taught to ignore the changes in JW published teachings over a century. I have always said I find Mormonism more believable than the idea that no one understood the Bible until JW founder Russell and his “Bible Studies” in the 1800s.
 
You have been “called out” a liar. This is your response?
TOP, I didn’t call him a liar per se, I said JWs who deny it are lying, he knows it’s true, but he is right for not answering me. I do not want to start an argument. Besides, he did the right thing for bringing the topic back to attention.
 
forum rules:

Questions are a better approach than assertions, unless the latter are framed in a non-confrontational and non-accusatory manner.

Terms of derision, derogatory remarks, baiting, and inflammatory statements are prohibited.

On the use of sarcasm: Use emoticons when possible to convey your intent. A smiley-face or a wink can demonstrate that you are not intending malice. End the post on a positive note, devoid of sarcasm. A pleasant ending can act like sugar helping the medicine go down. Think of sarcasm like salt. Just as you wouldn’t dump a shakerful on your food, don’t dump a load of sarcasm into a post. Use it sparingly

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=162027
 
forum rules:

Questions are a better approach than assertions, unless the latter are framed in a non-confrontational and non-accusatory manner.

Terms of derision, derogatory remarks, baiting, and inflammatory statements are prohibited.

On the use of sarcasm: Use emoticons when possible to convey your intent. A smiley-face or a wink can demonstrate that you are not intending malice. End the post on a positive note, devoid of sarcasm. A pleasant ending can act like sugar helping the medicine go down. Think of sarcasm like salt. Just as you wouldn’t dump a shakerful on your food, don’t dump a load of sarcasm into a post. Use it sparingly

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=162027
I think we all know this, and just in case you were making sure we don’t call names, I was just stating facts. You should know my previous post is true, you were a JW yourself. JWs have done you and many of us wrong, and I am only warning people. This is exactly why I should just stay away from these threads. They cause too much turmoil and people just get too touchy. On this same thread I’ve seen many trying to get away w/breaking forum rules. I was stating facts. I didn’t call the op anything. I just wanted to clarify to housemonkey and those who aren’t as familiar w/the JWs as you and I are, that whomever tells them they woudln’t be DF’d for missing meetings was lying. I’ve seen people be DF’d for that and saw it happen more than once, and I’m pretty sure you saw it too. I wasn’t intending to insult the OP.
 
Those “drones” are unselfish people who’ve decided to volunteer their time out of love of God and neighbor to help others learn about the Bible. Even in the face of insulting, unappreciative comments they work hard all day long without pay to help others learn about the Bible. This is a volunteer assignment. They can leave anytime they want.

JW’s attend meetings 3 days a week out of interest in the topic, Love of God, and love of neighbor. College students attend classes all day long 5 days a week and I doublt you’d be concern about their dedication.

People are not disfellowshipped for missing meetings or not being zealous.

Thank you for watching the videos.
Then it is me who is calling him on this. I think this whole thread is a tactical bait and an exercise of pride. Tim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top