JW's - Proving to JW's that Jesus is God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Randy_Carson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus: Creature of Creator?

The doctrine that most clearly sets the WTS apart from Christianity is its denial of the divinity of Christ. JWs maintain that Jesus is actually a creature—a highly exalted one at that—but not God himself. Scripturally, the evidence is not in their favor.

John 1:1 states unequivocally, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” This verse gave the JWs tremendous difficulty, and so in their own NWT they render the end of this verse as, “And the word was a god.” One great difficulty with this translation is how it contradicts passages such as Deuteronomy 32:39, which says, “I alone, am God and there are no gods together with me.” Further contradictions can be seen in Exodus 20:3, “Have no other gods besides me,” and Isaiah 43:10, “Before me no god was formed nor shall there be any after me.” When a particular translation so clearly opposes other verses in Scripture, one can know immediately that it is inaccurate.

In John 20:28 Thomas says to Jesus, “My Lord and my God.” In the original Greek it literally reads, “The Lord of me and the God of me.” It would be nothing short of blasphemy for Jesus not to rebuke Thomas if he was wrong. Jesus does nothing of the sort, but instead accepts Thomas’ profession of his identity as God.

The Bible indicates that God alone created the universe (Is. 44:24), and “he that constructed all things is God” (Heb. 3:4). However, Jesus created the heavens and the earth (Heb. 1:10). This passage by itself proves that Jesus is God, since an Old Testament reference to God (Ps. 102:26-28) is now given to him.

In John 8:58, Jesus takes the name of God, “I AM” (Ex. 3:15-18), and applies it to himself. Only God may use this title without blaspheming (Ex. 20:7, Deut. 5:11), and the punishment for someone other than God to use the sacred “I AM” is stoning (Lev. 24:16). Thus in verse 59, Jesus’ audience picked up stones to kill him, because they correctly understood his use of “I AM” as his claim to being God and hence thought he was guilty of blasphemy. This verse also proved to be difficult for the JWs to combat, and so they changed “I AM” to “I have been.” The Greek here is ego eimi, which any first-semester Greek student can tell you means “I am.” It should also be noted that it would be rather strange for people to stone Jesus for saying that he “had been.”

JWs maintain that only Jehovah God may be prayed to. But Stephen prayed to Jesus in Acts 7:59, and so one must conclude that Jesus is God. Otherwise, Stephen blasphemed while filled with the Holy Spirit (7:55). Now the JWs will assert that Stephen was praying as a result of the vision he originally beheld, where he saw God and Jesus in heaven (verse 55). However, verse 58 says that Stephen was dragged out of the city to be stoned, so clearly the vision had ended, for his stoning took place in a different location and at a later time. It is in the context of this later setting when Stephen clearly prays to Jesus that he might “receive [Stephen’s] spirit.”

The WTS would have their followers believe that Jehovah and Jesus are necessarily different beings, though the Bible tells another story. Jesus is called Mighty God in Isaiah 9:6, and in the very next chapter the same title is given to Jehovah in verse 21. Other shared titles include: King of Kings (compare with Rev. 17:14), Lord of Lords (Deut. 10:17; Rev. 17:14), the only Savior (Is. 43:10-11; Acts 4:12), the First and the Last (Is. 44:6; Rev. 22:13), the Alpha and the Omega (Rev. 1:8; Rev. 22:13-16), Rock (Is. 8:14; 1 Pet. 2:7-8), and Shepherd (Ps. 23:1; Heb. 13:20-21).

Jesus and Jehovah have much more in common than titles, though. They are both worshipped by angels (Heb. 1:6, Neh. 9:6). They are both unchanging (Heb. 13:8, Mal. 3:6). They both created the heavens and the earth (Heb. 1:10, Neh. 9:6) and are all-knowing (John 21:17, 1 John 3:20). Both give eternal life (John 10:28, 1 John 5:11), and judge the world (John 5:22, Ps. 96:13). To them every knee will bend and every tongue confess (Phil. 2:9-11, Is. 45:23).

catholic.com/library/More_Stumpers_for_Jehovah_Wit.asp
 
Is the Holy Spirit a Force or God?

Since the WTS insists that the Trinity is unbiblical and false, they relegate the Holy Spirit to the role of God’s impersonal active force which compels believers to do his will. In fact, they compare the Holy Spirit (which they render as “holy spirit”) to electricity.

The Bible begs to differ, though. There are numerous verses in the New Testament which clearly demonstrate both the personality and divinity of the Holy Spirit. For example, in Acts 13:2, the Holy Spirit says, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” In Acts 10:19-20, this “impersonal force” considers himself to be a person. John 16 supports this idea by referring to the Holy Spirit as a “he” 10 times in the same chapter. First Corinthians 12:11 states that the Holy Spirit “wills,” which is an irrefutable attribute of personhood, as is the capacity to love we see demonstrated by the Spirit in Romans 15:30. Scripture also states that the Holy Spirit can: be lied to (Acts 5:3), speak (Acts 10:19-20), hear (John 16:13-15), know the future (Acts 21:11), testify (John 15:26), teach (John 14:26), reprove (John 16:8-11), pray and intercede (Rom. 8:26), guide (John 16:13), call (Acts 13:2), be grieved (Eph. 4:30), feel hurt (Is. 63:10), be outraged (Heb. 10:29), desire (Gal. 5:17) and be blasphemed (Mark 3:29). Only a person is capable of these.

These examples demonstrate sufficiently that the Holy Spirit is a personal being, and so now one must demonstrate that he is God. Acts 5:1-4 teaches that a lie to the Holy Spirit is a lie to God himself. Isaiah 44:24 insists that God alone created the heavens and the earth, but Job 33:4 and Psalms 104:30 explains that the Holy Spirit created them. Only God is everlasting, and this is likewise an attribute Scripture gives the Holy Spirit (Heb. 9:14). The Jews put Jehovah to the test (Ex. 17:2), and the Holy Spirit takes the words of God, and claims they “tested and tried me” (Heb. 3:9). Unless the Holy Spirit is God, then he is an impostor. Again, in Hebrews 10:16, he claims to have placed his law in man’s hearts, though this was God’s work in Jeremiah 31:33. There is but one Lord (Eph. 4:5), and one Creator (Mal. 2:10), yet both the Father and the Spirit claim they are him (Matt. 11:25 and 2 Cor. 3:17; 1 Cor. 8:6 and Ps. 104:30). Only the Catholic understanding of the Trinity reconciles these passages.

catholic.com/library/More_Stumpers_for_Jehovah_Wit.asp
 
Is There a Bodily Resurrection of Christ?

According to the WTS, "The man Jesus is dead, forever dead . . . " (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 5, 454). “We deny that he was raised in the flesh, and challenge any statement to that effect as being unscriptural” (Studies, Vol. 7, 57). Jesus’ fleshly body “was disposed of by Jehovah God, dissolved into its constitutive elements or atoms” (The Watchtower, 9-1-1953, 518). “In order to convince Thomas of who he was, he used a body with wound holes” (You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth, 145). He was raised as an invisible spirit creature, with no physical body (Reasoning From the Scriptures, 214-215).

However, according to Scripture, “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain, and you are still in your sins” (1 Cor. 15:17). Jesus makes clear, even before death, that it is his body that will be raised up. He promises to raise up the temple once it is destroyed. “He was speaking about the temple of his body” (John 2:21). After he had risen, he gives the same testimony, “See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself; feel me and see, because a spirit does not have flesh and bones just as you behold that I have. . . . Do you have something there to eat?” (Luke 24:39, 41). Jesus insists that Thomas place his finger into his wounded side, so as to prove that he had indeed risen from the dead (John 20:27). There is no question that Jesus had truly risen from the dead. No Christian was under the impression that he was invisibly raised as Michael the Archangel, while God the Father dissolved his natural body. Such a presumption is without historical or scriptural warrant, and the “proof is in the pudding”: Ask the JW to show you a Scripture verse which backs up the WTS’s assertion about God disposing of Jesus’ body. He can’t, because there isn’t one.

catholic.com/library/More_Stumpers_for_Jehovah_Wit.asp
 
s Heaven Just for the “Anointed Class”?

The WTS teaches that only the anointed 144,000 seen in Revelation 7 will enter heaven (the “anointed class”), while the remainder that are not annihilated (the “other sheep”) will live forever on earth in paradise. However, the Bible poses some irreconcilable difficulties with this idea.

If Revelation 7 is to be taken literally, there would only be 144,000 Jewish male virgins taken from a square shaped earth that are now in heaven worshipping a sheep. This would mean that Peter (not a virgin), the Blessed Mother (not a male), and Charles Taze Russell (not a Jew) could not be in heaven. Reading one number literally while taking the rest of a book symbolically is not sound exegesis. Beyond this, we see in Revelation 14 that the 144,000 stand before the 24 elders from Revelation 4:4. This at least brings the grand total to 144,024 people. But, the Scriptures indicate that there are still more to come. Revelation 7:9 speaks of a countless multitude before the throne, which is in heaven (Rev. 14:2-3). Still in the book of Revelation, we read that all those with their name in the book of life are in heaven (Rev. 21:27), while all whose names are not in the book of life are thrown into the pool of fire (Rev. 20:15). There is no third “earthly” class. Jesus reiterates this, and never speaks of two flocks. He has one bride, whose “reward is great in heaven” (Luke 6:23). Paul even exhorts the Christian community, calling them to remember, “As for us, our citizenship exists in the heavens” (Phil. 3:20).

The JWs attempt to use verses such as Psalms 37:29 as evidence that the just are to inherit the land forever, which is earth. In context, this refers to inheriting the promised land as a sign of God’s blessing in the Old Testament. But, Hebrews 11:8-16 indicates that there is a homeland better than the promised land on earth, and this is the heavenly one for those who die in faith. The Old Testament patriarchs “publicly declared that they were strangers and temporary residents in the land . . . they are earnestly seeking a place of their own. . . . But now they are reaching out for a better [place], that is, one belonging to heaven. . . . God . . . has made a city ready for them. . . .These [OT men and women] did not get the [fulfillment of the] promise . . . as God foresaw something better for us” (Heb. 11:13-16,39-40). Even the footnote of the NWT makes clear that the “city” spoken of in these verses is the heavenly Jerusalem mentioned in Hebrews 12:22 and Revelation 21:2. But, the Watchtower still maintains that no one that lived before Christ will ever enter heaven. “The apostle Paul in the eleventh chapter of Hebrews names a long list of faithful men who died before the crucifixion of the Lord. . . . These can never be a part of the heavenly class” (Millions Now Living, p. 89). Only the 144,000 elite that all lived after the death of Christ will supposedly go to heaven. Matthew 8:11-12 provides severe difficulties for this idea, since Jesus proclaims, “many from eastern parts and western parts will come and recline at the table with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of the heavens; whereas the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the darkness outside. There is where [their] weeping and the gnashing of [their] teeth will be.” No verse could be clearer in declaring that the patriarchs are in heaven. The following verses all demonstrate that Christians go to heaven, and do not remain on earth: 2 Corinthians 5:1; Hebrews 3:1; Ephesians 2:6; Colossians 1:4-5; 1 Peter 1:4.

catholic.com/library/More_Stumpers_for_Jehovah_Wit.asp
 
Are Jesus and Michael the Archangel Really the Same Person?

One of the most peculiar of the WTS’s teachings is their assertion that Jesus is actually Michael the Archangel. If the JW has difficulty explaining any particular doctrine, it will be this one. Even JWs will admit that if one were to have walked up to any of the apostles or disciples of Christ and asked them who Jesus was, they would not have said, “Well, he’s Michael the Archangel!” Not only was the very idea was unheard of before Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the WTS), but the Bible explicitly rejects the possibility of it.

For example, the author of Hebrews states, “To which of the angels did God ever say, ‘You are my son? . . . Let all the angels of God worship him. . . . Your throne, O God, stands firm forever. . . . O Lord, you established the earth, and the heavens are the works of your hands’ . . . to which of the angels has he ever said ‘Sit at my right hand . . . ’” (Heb. 1). Here, the author of Hebrews separates Jesus from angels, and commands the angels to worship him (cf. Rev. 5:13-14,14:6-7). The obvious problem is this: Archangels are creatures, but the Bible forbids any creature to worship another creature. Thus, either the Bible is in error by commanding the angels to worship an archangel, or Jesus is uncreated and cannot be an archangel. Since this gave the JWs a tremendous problem, they even had to change their own Bible translation, called the New World Translation (NWT), to eliminate the references to worshipping Christ. (The 1950, 1961, and 1970 editions of the NWT read “worship” in Hebrews 1:6.) Beyond this, Jesus has the power to forgive sins and give eternal life, but no angel has this capacity.

catholic.com/library/More_Stumpers_for_Jehovah_Wit.asp
 
I think it would behoove anyone following this discussion to check out the following link on what some scholars have to say about John 1:1 and the New World Translation.

forananswer.org/Top_JW/Scholars%20%20NWT.htm NWT

Hope I can get the link to work. Since I can’t get it to work do a search at For an answer: Christian Apologetics Scholars & NWT or maybe someone else can get the link to work. Thanks.
 
Now steve, be honest and read these things posted for you. you seem like a fair minded person, and anyone who comes here as a jw ought to be commended because that is good that you come here and talk to us about what you believe. now, if your as fair minded as i think you are, then you’ll see what i posted from the CAF library and read it over. if your close minded, you wont. most jw’s wouldn’t read such things because the society forbids it.

would you let them dictate to you what you can or cannot read?
i mean jw’s state that they will discuss things openly, so please discuss what i posted from the CAF library. we will be glad to discuss it with you.

i wouldn’t let an organization dictate to me what i can and cannot read. i’d have the mind to do my own research and if someone asked me to be open minded about a topic and to research it i would. iam a fair individual. i think you are also.

if you decide not to read the posts above this one, well, it only tells us what we all believe, that people who are witnesses are brainwashed and wont read anything that is not from their own society. anyone with half a mind would want to see what others think and why they think it.

please, do read them. you do have a right to question what your belief practices, and you have a right to be informed as to whether that what they teach is true or not. everything posted above this one proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt, what your society teaches is false. i for one would not hang around any belief that
teaches falsehoods and lies. but that is me.
 
steve, what does Revelation 22 18-19 say? Can you tell me? then think about this if you will, since the society has altered the scriptures, what it states there in Revelation 22:18-19 applies to them and that cannot be denied.
 
TraditionalCath said:
Are Jesus and Michael the Archangel Really the Same Person?

One of the most peculiar of the WTS’s teachings is their assertion that Jesus is actually Michael the Archangel. If the JW has difficulty explaining any particular doctrine, it will be this one. Even JWs will admit that if one were to have walked up to any of the apostles or disciples of Christ and asked them who Jesus was, they would not have said, “Well, he’s Michael the Archangel!” Not only was the very idea was unheard of before Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the WTS), but the Bible explicitly rejects the possibility of it.

For example, the author of Hebrews states, “To which of the angels did God ever say, ‘You are my son? . . . Let all the angels of God worship him. . . . Your throne, O God, stands firm forever. . . . O Lord, you established the earth, and the heavens are the works of your hands’ . . . to which of the angels has he ever said ‘Sit at my right hand . . . ’” (Heb. 1). Here, the author of Hebrews separates Jesus from angels, and commands the angels to worship him (cf. Rev. 5:13-14,14:6-7). The obvious problem is this: Archangels are creatures, but the Bible forbids any creature to worship another creature. Thus, either the Bible is in error by commanding the angels to worship an archangel, or Jesus is uncreated and cannot be an archangel. Since this gave the JWs a tremendous problem, they even had to change their own Bible translation, called the New World Translation (NWT), to eliminate the references to worshipping Christ. (The 1950, 1961, and 1970 editions of the NWT read “worship” in Hebrews 1:6.) Beyond this, Jesus has the power to forgive sins and give eternal life, but no angel has this capacity.

catholic.com/library/More_Stumpers_for_Jehovah_Wit.asp
Click to expand...
I had a discussion with a Jehovah’s Witness on this topic and he tried to argue that the word proskuneo (to worship) can also mean obeisance. It was once permissible for humans to bow down to angels or other humans, but with the coming of Jesus this was no longer allowed because Jehovah had made a new arrangement. All worship to Jehovah has now got to go through Jesus. I countered by stating that it has always been proper to bow down to humans and angels, as long as it isn’t done in adoration. Bowing down to a human in adoration would be forbidden because it belongs to God alone. Jesus certainly must not have been aware of this new arrangement for he uses the example of obeisance done to a king in one of his parables. See Matt. 18:26 Moreover, Rev. 5:13-14 shows that blessing, honor, glory and might and worship belong to both the one sitting on the throne and to the Lamb. Equal blessing, honor, glory, might and worship.
 
oh they are good at twisting things believe me. i asked him to read Rev. 22:18-19 do you think he will? he might. but he will twist it. this is typical typical jw behavior believe me. if you corner them, they will try to run, or they will to no avail, try to defend their belief.

they are told to walk away when they cannot back up what they say.or when the discussion is not to their liking. i’ve seen this so many times, and experienced it first hand. they are totally brainwashed.

do you think he’ll tell us what it says there in Revelation? nope. he might, but then he’ll twist it and make other claims. he’ll defend his society to his last breath. that is the way they are. they are fanatics and they vigorously defend the lies and false predictions of their society.

when their society is caught making a false prediction, they will put out an article claiming there is “new light” on the situation. that is just a crock. they love to spin things their way and the love to twist what you say. anyone with half a mind would just walk away from them and not look back.

for those who do speak to them, and persist with it, God bless you. Don’t give up! one of them just might leave and REALLY come to know Christ Jesus and the TRUTH.
 
For those of you who want to know what it says there in Revelation, here it is:

Revelation 22:18-19 (King James Version)

18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

you do not add or take away anything that is written in the Holy Bible.
 
for those who do speak to them, and persist with it, God bless you. Don’t give up! one of them just might leave and REALLY come to know Christ Jesus and the TRUTH.

You are so right, TraditionalCath.
I am one of very many people on these forums who was
once a convinced, fanatical Jehovah’s Witness.
By the grace of God and the prayers of many Catholics for the conversion of heretics and JWs, I was led by God to this most beautiful and holy Catholic faith.
That is why I encourage everybody on this forum to offer at LEAST one prayer a month (such as a Rosary) to God specifically for the conversion of Jehovah’s Witnesses to Catholicism. They too are valuable souls for whom Christ died to save and fill with the Spirit.

God bless,
Jaypeeto4
+JMJ+
 
Jaypeeto4 said:
for those who do speak to them, and persist with it, God bless you. Don’t give up! one of them just might leave and REALLY come to know Christ Jesus and the TRUTH.

You are so right, TraditionalCath.
I am one of very many people on these forums who was
once a convinced, fanatical Jehovah’s Witness.
By the grace of God and the prayers of many Catholics for the conversion of heretics and JWs, I was led by God to this most beautiful and holy Catholic faith.
That is why I encourage everybody on this forum to offer at LEAST one prayer a month (such as a Rosary) to God specifically for the conversion of Jehovah’s Witnesses to Catholicism. They too are valuable souls for whom Christ died to save and fill with the Spirit.

God bless,
Jaypeeto4
+JMJ+
Click to expand...
Exactly. your suggestion is a good one.
 
BibleSteve said:
I’m not sure measuring a person’s academic knowledge in Greek is what Jesus had in mind for us in determining who is acceptable to him. Nor are the degrees they have… Peter and John were “unlettered” and “ordinary”… Jesus said it was a matter of “doing” the will of his Father.

You only prove my point. If you are truly concerned about the “truth” Scriptural and historical, why bring up the behavior of one Catholic person in history? Athanasius taking action against the arians was not uncommon to his day. I referrenced Wikipedia (a secular site) simply to show you that looking at one persons behavior doesn’t get to the facts of which church is the one Christ established (1 Tim 3:15). The fact that Charles Taze Russell didn’t know Greek is a great concern as the New World Translation attempts to translate John 1:1 as saying Jesus “The word was a god” which is following the same theology as Russell and which contradicts ALL of the Christian Scripture scholars of the past who affirm “The Word was God.”
(Matthew 7:21-23) “Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will. 22Many will say to me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?’ 23And yet then I will confess to them: I never knew YOU! Get away from me, YOU workers of lawlessness.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
TraditionalCath said:
That quote from the Bible has nothing to do with Bishopites statement to you about Charles T. Russel. I don’t know why you quoted that.Precisely why did you quote this scripture to him? What has that got to do with what he posted about Russel not knowing greek? please elaborate.
Click to expand...
The previous post dismiss Russell because he didn’t know Greek. I have never got the impression that deciding who has Bible truth is a function of measuring their academic knowledge.

Jesus said something similar:

(Matthew 11:25) At that time Jesus said in response: “I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and intellectual ones and have revealed them to babes.

When someone says we should disregard someone view about the Bible because of a lack of secular knowledge, or lack of degrees, I believe that is contrary to the way Jehovah and Jesus view matters. Higher Education, like riches, can make a person feel superior to others… not a quality Jehovah and Jesus are interested in.
 
TraditionalCath said:
Steve, you seem like a fiarly open minded guy. have a look at these from the CAF library, and tell us what you think.
The WTS maintains that it is God’s reliable mouthpiece to the nations, and it claims to be God’s inspired prophet (WT, 4-1-1972, 197)—and yet its prophecies have repeatedly proven to be false. The only conclusion to be drawn is that the WTS is to be rejected as a false prophet.
Click to expand...
Perhaps Yessisan would like to comment on this. I just went through this with her, showing her Watchtower articles from 1880 through the 1950’s showing her this statement on the Catholic site is false.

JW’s and the WTS have explicity said on many occassions they are not inspired, and don’t claimed to be inspired. They read the Bible and give their interpretation of prophesy.

If you are so quick to want to throw stones at JW’s for having an incorrect understanding about a subjective topic like prophetic interpretation, are you similarly concerned over the Churches incorrect view about the earth being the center of the Universe and harassing Galileo over his heretical view the earth went around the Sun?

Steve

P.S. You don’t to ask if I know about this or that complaint about the WTS, Russell, Rutherford, Miracle Wheat, etc. I’ve studied each and every topic diligently for over 30 years. Most JW-critics are simply passing along quotes from others without checking the original WT articles (Is this what you are doing too?).

Isn’t it far better to actually diligently research whether a charge is true before just passing it along?
 
Claude_Kenneson said:
I think it would behoove anyone following this discussion to check out the following link on what some scholars have to say about John 1:1 and the New World Translation.

forananswer.org/Top_JW/Scholars%20%20NWT.htm NWT

Hope I can get the link to work. Since I can’t get it to work do a search at For an answer: Christian Apologetics Scholars & NWT or maybe someone else can get the link to work. Thanks.
Click to expand...
The NWT was reviewed by Jason David BeDuhn, an associate professor of religious studies at Northern Arizona University, in Flagstaff. He holds a B.A. in Religious studies from the University of Illinois, Urbana, and M.T.S. in New Testament and Christian Origins from Harvard Divinity School, and a Ph.D. in the Comparative Study of Religions from Indiana University, Bloomington.

He found the NWT translation to be one of the most accurate. It is regularly dissed by many with anti-JW hatred and agenda (kinda like the mean-spired comments I get here).

Here’s a detailed review of the book by another non-JW:

tetragrammaton.org/truthintrans.htm
 
TraditionalCath said:
Now steve, be honest and read these things posted for you. you seem like a fair minded person, and anyone who comes here as a jw ought to be commended because that is good that you come here and talk to us about what you believe. now, if your as fair minded as i think you are, then you’ll see what i posted from the CAF library and read it over. if your close minded, you wont. most jw’s wouldn’t read such things because the society forbids it. .
Click to expand...
I have read those articles and the dozens of anti-JW books they’ve quoted from. So, you can rest assured that I’m “honest and open minded”. As you post this derogatory stuff on the discussion board, I ask you: Have you ever gone back and done **your **homework to check the quotes or are you just passing them along? I have gone back and pulled up every article ever quoted against the WTS and checked the quotes. I’ve also looked up “the other side of the story”, letting the WTS comment on their view of the complaint. Have you? Or are you just copy/pasting your complaints against JW’s without checking?

Steve
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top