H
Havard
Guest
I try to sit just to the side / not sit directly behind other people because of this. But my parish isn’t packed, so it’s possible to do that.
Depends why you are sitting.I usually try to adjust back a bit. That being said, I find it discourteous to sit when people are kneeling without at least sitting forward enough to give the poor person behind you some space. I mean, how difficult is it to lean forward a foot or so if you need to sit while others are kneeling?
Okay, but this puts your hair sin someone’s face, or at least it would mine if you were in front of me. I know. I have been there literally where the person in front of me leaned all the way back into my face. I consider that to be “too much”. If I am in a position of quit kneeling, I will sit (like before Mass) rather than stay in contact with the person’s head. If I am not, then I just endure the contact.Me? If I am sitting, I am doing it because I can’t kneel. Therefore, sitting forward a foot or so may be too much.
Then I better tell the Lord to cure my Lupus, because pnewton thinks it is too much when the Lupus makes me to sick to sit forward.Okay, but this puts your hair sin someone’s face, or at least it would mine if you were in front of me. I know. I have been there literally where the person in front of me leaned all the way back into my face. I consider that to be “too much”. If I am in a position of quit kneeling, I will sit (like before Mass) rather than stay in contact with the person’s head. If I am not, then I just endure the contact.
Singing is praying twice! Unless your parish has a practice of a meditation song after communion is served and the song is instrumental, I see no reason for you not to sing to each and every song.I just learned about why Catholics knee during the whole time for Communion since I was rather confused on the matter and figured since the parish that I attend does Communion by station (there is not an alter rail for people to kneel at; not sure if this is a common thing across all Catholic churches).
The Catholic Church that I attend has some sort of hymn going on during Communion. Since I can’t take communion because I am not Catholic while my fellow pew mates are taking Communion I usually sing along with my hymnal and then when my pew mates return and the song is finish. I move from sitting in my pew to back to kneeling. I do have the rule that I am not allow to sing after the first song is done. Usually the next song is a song I know so it makes it challenging to focus on prayer vs. wanting to sing along. I blame my Lutheran heritage for my love of hymns.
Not aiming this a ccmcmg as such, but this is a post that highlights most of the issue for me. I have bolded the two sentences that seem to sum up the problem. There is often no way of knowing the reason why a person has chosen the ‘position’ they have (unless you are in a very small parish where every single person in the church is known to you…lucky you!); charitably it should be assumed that there is a very good reason why the person in front of you is sitting right back in the pew; or the person behind you is kneeling way beyond the time you kneel; the best thing is to graciously accommodate the postures of those in front of or behind you, either by ‘sneeling’ or moving slightly over in the pew (if possible).Courtesy should definitely be considered.
I was raised and taught that you sat back after the priest sat down. But others remain kneeling until it’s time to stand for final prayers. ** It is a (small!!) annoyance when I sit back, and the man behind me is kneeling at ‘attention’, and over the back of the pew, and I have no where to go.** My personality has a tendency to get cranky when I’m being ‘forced’ to do something not because it’s right, but because someone else thinks I should, and that makes me feel like I’m being judged for not continuing to kneel. This just happened last weekend
If I’m kneeling and someone sits down in front of me (non-Catholic/someone who can’t kneel) I make the adjustment.
It’s interesting to note that the posture for Communion according to the GIRM was standing for 25 years before anyone noticed.I am in one of our parish choirs, which means I am standing and singing during communion. When the last person is served, or as close to then as possible, we end our song. Then we kneel and pray. If I am at a Mass where I am not singing in a choir, I am kneeling during communion.
I kneel until the hosts are contained within the tabernacle and the door is closed. This is in reverance of Jesus and helps in meditation. I thought this was the standard. Doesn’t make a difference to me if we have a choice. Kneeling position is worship in His presence and helps me to focus on the fact that communion is not just an activity or part of the Mass.
+
5 June 2003
Prot. n. 855/03/L
Dubium: In many places, the faithful are accustomed to kneeling or sitting in personal prayer upon returning to their places after individually received Holy Communion during Mass. Is it the intention of the Missale Romanum, editio typica tertia, to forbid this practice?
Responsum: Negative, et ad mentem. The mens is that that the prescription of the Institutio Generalis Missalis Romani, no. 43, is intended, on one hand, to ensure within broad limits a certain uniformity of posture within the congregation for the various parts of the celebration of the Holy Mass, and on the other, to not regulate posture rigidly in such a way that those who wish to kneel or sit would no longer be free.
You are so right!Americans have so many personal-space issues.
No I don’t. As I said, I have no issue with offering up suffering, especially if it is needed for someone with health issues. Though honestly, it is not much of a problem. Most people who need to sit when everyone else kneels is courteous enough to give a little space, moving to the side, if the have to have the full back rest.Then I better tell the Lord to cure my Lupus, because pnewton thinks it is too much when the Lupus makes me to sick to sit forward.
It is not an “issue”. It is a cultural difference. Many things vary from culture to culture without being either wrong or unhealthy. It is just a difference and should be tolerated.Americans have so many personal-space issues.
But doesn’t custom trump IGMR/GIRM, if I’m reading Canon Law correctly?It’s interesting to note that the posture for Communion according to the GIRM was standing for 25 years before anyone noticed.
If that were true in 100% of cases there would have been no reason for the dubium.But doesn’t custom trump IGMR/GIRM, if I’m reading Canon Law correctly?
I come here to learn, and by gosh I did learn something today.About a hundred years ago, German military officers wore the Pickelhaube, or spiked helmet. If you are female and covering your head is an option,… just an idea….![]()
I then wasn’t clear enough; if for some reason, ANYONE sits back, or kneels forward, I make the adjustment, and assume that they are doing it for a reason; the reason isn’t relevant to me; I still make the adjustment.Not aiming this a ccmcmg as such, but this is a post that highlights most of the issue for me. I have bolded the two sentences that seem to sum up the problem. There is often no way of knowing the reason why a person has chosen the ‘position’ they have (unless you are in a very small parish where every single person in the church is known to you…lucky you!); charitably it should be assumed that there is a very good reason why the person in front of you is sitting right back in the pew; or the person behind you is kneeling way beyond the time you kneel; the best thing is to graciously accommodate the postures of those in front of or behind you, either by ‘sneeling’ or moving slightly over in the pew (if possible).
Sorry, guess I wasn’t clear either. I was using your post to agree that the person being ‘crowded’ as it were should be the one who makes the adjustment.I then wasn’t clear enough; if for some reason, ANYONE sits back, or kneels forward, I make the adjustment, and assume that they are doing it for a reason; the reason isn’t relevant to me; I still make the adjustment.
I had to think about it for awhile, but I now see your point.If that were true in 100% of cases there would have been no reason for the dubium.