M
ROTFL:yup:
:bigyikes:
.
The following are clarifications. You will notice Rome does not attach the stipulation (“Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm”) — to the peoples right to kneel.
ewtn.com/expert/answers/cdw2002.htm
I believe it is due to the large crowds that attend Mass in the US, and the need to keep the communion line moving quickly.Still, Rome says in the last letter that it is the norm in the U.S. to stand receiving communion. I wonder, what are the reasons the Church made it the norm?
Still, Rome says in the last letter that it is the norm in the U.S. to stand receiving communion. I wonder, what are the reasons the Church made it the norm?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walking_Home
The following are clarifications. You will notice Rome does not attach the stipulation (“Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm”) — to the peoples right to kneel.
ewtn.com/expert/answers/cdw2002.htm
While there are two universal norms, the GIRM clearly states that “The norm for reception of Holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States is standing.” Kneeling is not the norm in the US. In fact, the GIRM goes on to state, “Communicants should not be denied Holy Communion because they kneel. Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.”
Nowhere have I read that to kneel you would be deniened communion. You would have to be careful with the line behind you, but you would still receive.
Correction — there is the universal norm (kneeling) and the exception to the universal norm (standing). Rome has clarified standing was allowed only with the stipulation that kneeling Not be denied. By denying kneeling — the bishops are in truth breaking the recognitio that allowed for them to have the norm for standing.
Evangelical Protestants and other non-mainline Protestants don’t stand to take Communion. They sit in pews.I am confused by your comment (I bolded it). I get what you are saying, but could you clarify it?
And I agree with you about the standing to receive comment. The Protestants did it to signify the fact that they see communion as a symbol. We took it on as an indult after V2, and now it is just out of hand. sigh
Nowhere have I read that to kneel you would be deniened communion. You would have to be careful with the line behind you, but you would still receive.
It is the norm to receive on the hand when I am doing Eucharistic Minister duties, though those who show they want it on the tounge still receive it, I would do the same for kneeling.
There is no mass conspiracy (no pun intended) to get rid of it even if it is not widespread any more.
Do you have a document that contradicts the GIRM? If not, what I quoted from the GIRM is still the case.
Correction — there is the universal norm (kneeling) and the exception to the universal norm (standing). Rome has clarified standing was allowed only with the stipulation that kneeling Not be denied. By denying kneeling — the bishops are in truth breaking the recognitio that allowed for them to have the norm for standing.
Do you have a document that contradicts the GIRM? If not, what I quoted from the GIRM is still the case.
No. What is the CDW?
Are you aware that the CDW has the authority to clarify how the GIRM is to be interpreted.
I find comments like this very disturbing.Just because it is the “norm” doesn’t make it right.
I find comments like this very disturbing.
To be a Catholic is to give up our “right” to individually interpret the Bible and religion, and instead, submit to and obey the Christ-appointed authority of His Church.
I think that saying that the Church is “not right” is what is taking away true Catholicism.
I think we need to strive to not only submit, but we need to strive to stop gritting our teeth, rolling our eyes, and murmuring complaints (e.g., "it’s just not right).
I spent 47 years in the evangelical Protestant church making up my own mind about what is right and wrong. I am thrilled to hand all these decisions over to the Catholic Church. If the Church says that it’s OK for the Bishops in the U.S. to allow the faithful to receive Communion in the hand while standing, I am NOT going to accuse the Church of “not being right” and I am NOT going to sigh and long for better leadership in the Church. If this Church isn’t RIGHT at this very moment, then we may as well all be Protestants.

Actually, this is not what the Church wants. To do so would mean restricting our own gifts. The Church thrives on diversity of opinion, not uniformity. Uniformity of thought brings stagnation on the road to irrelevance. We all have our gifts to bring to the Church and that is one of the historical strengths of the Church. Throughout Church history, times of increased uniformity meant playing catchup at a later point in history.I find comments like this very disturbing.
To be a Catholic is to give up our “right” to individually interpret the Bible and religion, and instead, submit to and obey the Christ-appointed authority of His Church.
I think that saying that the Church is “not right” is what is taking away true Catholicism.
I think we need to strive to not only submit, but we need to strive to stop gritting our teeth, rolling our eyes, and murmuring complaints (e.g., "it’s just not right).
No. What is the CDW?