S
Sir_Anthony
Guest
In the parish I attend, they stand, and I grew up with kneeling, and I will like to kneel, maybe one day I will kneel there, but I guess when in Rome do as the Romans do.
It sounds as if you have a wonderful pastor. He neither ignored the bishop’s directive nor did he just tell you how it’s going to be. He provided you with a lesson. May God bless him.Up until about six weeks ago, we always used to kneel again right after the Agnus Dei. The week after our Bishop returned home from the Synod of Bishops in Rome, our pastor , instead of his usual homily at Sunday Mass, gave us a teaching lesson on the parts of the Mass, and talked about the rubrics and their meaning. He also spoke about posture during Mass, standing, kneeling and sitting. At the end he said that beginning that very day, instead of kneeling after the Agnus Dei we were to remain standing until after Communion. Apparently this is to be the norm throughout the Diocese from now on.
Naturally at that Mass when the Agnus Dei had been sung, everyone dropped to their knees as we have always done. I was near the back so could see pretty well the whole congregation. One elderly man half way up remained standing. Father paused and gently asked us to stand and most did although there were perhaps a dozen people who didn’t. In the weeks since, most people do stand but there are still the same few who kneel. I have found it very hard to remain standing because I have always knelt at that point in the Mass, both pre and post Vatican II. Kneeling has been ingrained into my soul. I am sorely tempted to kneel and rationalize my reasons for doing so. The Sunday after the new directive, I did kneel but just for a minute. It surely felt the most natural for me but in my heart I knew I was being disobedient so I quickly stood.
Whenever I attend Mass in a different Diocese or in another country, I always kneel or stand when the rest of the congregation does according to their norms. The very least I can do is follow the directives laid down by my own Bishop!
I don’t know about that. If He said “on your feet” as He walked through the doors of my parish, I doubt I would be struggling to kneel. I would hope I would heed His directive and stand.Hi all,
Thanks for the post and comments. Not pushing right or wrong here. I respect the opinion of others of course. However, I will always be a kneeler when possible.
youtube.com/watch?v=MIj-nD3qXVM
Check out this link…it’s pretty awesome. My question to the non-kneelers would be this. We all understand that Jesus is truly present in the Eucharist, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. Now, let’s just say for the sake of saying that Jesus in his bodily form walked through the doors of the Church (that is as we understand human bodily form such as me and you).
Who would be on their feet at that point? Anyone? I think not. In fact, I think we would all be on our faces. So what is the difference?
Just my $0.02
Have a blessed New Year.
J.A.
No worries at all…
I would say though that there is at least one other time when it’s not appropriate for Latin Rite Catholics to kneel in some cases during the OF Mass.
After the sign of peace when the Agnus Dei begins, it’s up to the local ordinary if people should kneel or stand. It’s his decision unlike after receiving communion where one’s posture is fully up to the communicant.
If one’s ordinary said to stand during this part in the Mass it would be wrong to kneel. This differs a bit from those who insist on kneeling at communion and the Church has said they are not to be denied, but rather counseled on the importance of posture uniformity outside of Mass.
Actually the Church has said people are not to be refused communion because they kneel. I don’t believe the Holy See ever rescinded the need to counsel communicants (outside of Mass) on the importance of a uniform posture.
Actually the Church (Rome) has said no such thing as --“but rather counseled on the importance of posture uniformity outside of Mass”. What the Church (Rome) has clearly stated concerning kneeling is–no one is to be accused of disobedience, acting illicitly, And are NOT to be imposed upon. Seems the Not imposing upon someone who kneels over-rides the “counseling on the importance of posture uniformity”. Not imposing upon one who kneels – IS following the directives of the Church (Rome).
Actually the Church has said people are not to be refused communion because they kneel. I don’t believe the Holy See ever rescinded the need to counsel communicants (outside of Mass) on the importance of a uniform posture.
I don’t believe that is correct. I think if the counseling was not supposed to take place, the Holy See would have said so in very clear terms. It didn’t.
I do not believe you will find the Holy See stating for the need of counseling. In non of the letters from Rome will you find such “counseling” being mentioned. What you will find as stated prior–is the statement that those who kneel are Not to be imposed upon. The “counseling” would be an imposition on the person(s).
I don’t believe that is correct. I think if the counseling was not supposed to take place, the Holy See would have said so in very clear terms. It didn’t.
Still my focus is one why some people who know better feel it’s OK to kneel in an Eastern Catholic church when the Church says to stand? These very same people would be angry if Eastern Catholics stood during kneeling times in the EF Mass. Why the double standard? Is this widespread or just a local thing?
Today there were maybe 6-8 who knelt when they should have been standing. These are long-time parishioners who come here because they cannot make it to the EF. They know better. They have been catechized yet they seem to think they have license to kneel. I approached one of them in the most tactful manner I could and softly asked why he knelt. He became very defensive and didn’t even try to answer my question. I asked our pastor in private and he did nothing but roll his eyes…
He already has many times. Both before and after the Holy See said those who kneel should not be denied communion, but rather counseled outside of the Mass.
For the Latin Rite – Rome has been clear on the matter of kneeling for communion — “Indeed, the faithful should not be imposed upon nor accused of disobedience and of acting illicitly when they kneel to receive Holy Communion.” “Counseling” someone for kneeling —is imposing on the person. Furthermore the “counseling” implies that has been illicitness/disobedience in kneeling.
Now --as to what happened in your Eastern parish. The group who knelt may be under the impression that since Rome has clarified and stated people can kneel after receiving communion (applies to the EF and OF) – that this may also apply to the Eastern parishes. If they return – the priest should remind them to stand.
That part about ‘counselling’ didn’t come from the Holy See but from the USCCB. The documents from Rome on kneeling for Communion make no mention of counselling, that’s in the American adaptations to the GIRM.He already has many times. Both before and after the Holy See said those who kneel should not be denied communion, but rather counseled outside of the Mass.
He already has many times. Both before and after the Holy See said those who kneel should not be denied communion but rather counseled outside of the Mass.
One can ultimately do anything they want, but that certainly doesn’t make it right. No we are not to do “what feels comfortable.” We are to do what the Church directs us to, so long as we are able to.Each rite has it’s own suggestion of what should be done. It’s simply tradition. You can do what feels comfortable. Do as you were always taught, or follow the local custom.
One can ultimately do anything they want, but that certainly doesn’t make it right. No we are not to do “what feels comfortable.” We are to do what the Church directs us to, so long as we are able to.
That’s why I’m still puzzled why some people would be defiant and kneel in an Eastern Catholic church when there is no question in their individual situations that they have indeed been catechized on the proper posture for the given church.
These very same people would be angry if Eastern Catholics took it upon themselves to stand throughout a EF Mass. I wish I understood the dichotomy of reasoning.
We catholics are advised (as in ORDERED) by our bishops to also stand.In my Eastern Catholic church we are directed by the official rubrics to stand after communion. This has been reinforced time and time again by our pastor. About a year ago a rather large family left the parish after several years because a weekly EF Mass was started. No problem there. I do want to point out that each one was well aware of the standing rubric.
If they are in a blocking position they too should have STOOD or let the others pass infront of them kneeling.They all visited this Christmas Morning. How wonderful. All of them were sitting up in the front row and once they received communion they all knelt. I only noticed it because it made it very difficult for me to return to my spot, as it is not designed for people to kneel in that area.
I was thinking about how they would feel if 8 visitors sitting in the front row of their EF Mass felt the need to stand when the EF rubrics directs the faithful to kneel? I am certain each one would have been angry. I know others who share there viewpoint.
Is this one-sidedness just a local thing? Or is there something that tells such people “it’s always OK to kneel no matter what yet they must adhere to our rubrics when they visit our church?”
It is a National directive from the USCCB etal?I really don’t know what to think?